Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi
Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi
Wake Up Kiwi
    The New Zealand Government: A United States SEC Registered Corporation  |  Who Owns New Zealand's Banks - And Australia's Banks - Anyone's Banks?
 
Wake Up Kiwi
 
Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi

· Home / Introduction

CURRENT AFFAIRS

· Current Events & Breaking News

· Cabal / Illuminati / NWO Watch

· Mainstream Media Manipulation

· Banking Crimes & Criminals

· Political Crimes & Criminals

· Feature Articles

· Positive Developments

ILLUMINATI / NWO

· NWO Globalist Agenda

· Secret Societies & The Illuminati

· Conspiracy To Rule The World

· What / Who Is "The Crown"?

· Agenda 21 In New Zealand

· Surveillance Society/Police State

· 'Terrorism' & Engineered Wars

· Eugenics / Depopulation Agenda

· Religion As A Tool For Control

· Common Law Vs Statute Law

SCIENCE / TECHNOLOGY

· The Climate Change Scam

· Chemtrails & Geoengineering

· Suppressed Science

· Positive New Technologies

· Cures, Health & Wellbeing

· Dangerous & Dirty Technology

· Spiritual Aspects & Metaphysics

· The Extra-Terrestrial Presence

HISTORY

· Suppressed / Hidden History

· Real New Zealand History

· The Opal File: NZ / AUS History

· 150+ NWO Globalist Quotes

MISCELLANEOUS

· Political Commentary

· Positive Resources

· Resistance, Resources & Links

· Contact


Newsletter archive - click here

Site Search:









 

Wake Up Kiwi
Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi

Current Events and Breaking News

Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi

Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi
News Archives



 

Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi

Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi

Two Major Psy Ops Documents You Must Read
May 18 2015 | From: TruthStreamMedia

These psychological operations are being used on you.The Amerikan and global populace have no conception of the level of advanced, high-tech psychological operations they are under. The field of psy ops, which used to be a tool of governments and military strategists against rival nations has now been turned upon the masses by the emerging global government.



 For the last century, thousands of think tanks have perfected the use of propaganda through fields like advertising, neurological research, psychology, etc.  The father of modern advertising and Defense Department brain Edward Bernays, opened his classic Propaganda in 1928 with the following:


"The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country. 

One of the ironies of propaganda to work is that its population must be educated. Ellul argues that the university education forms the next generation of propagandist to manipulate its society.





In other words, the more highly educated you are, the more integrated you are in this propaganda and its dissemination.

Remember Ellul is not talking about the obvious Nazi or Communist propaganda during the Second World War which was for a short-term campaign using a vertical process (top down approach easily countered by a competing top down approach).

No, Ellul is talking about the horizontal process similar to how viruses infect adjoining people around them.

Imagine an intellectual virus which spreads itself similar to a biological virus, through contact and multiply this with mass media technology as a delivery system.
We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of.
This is a logical result of the way in which our democratic society is organized. Vast numbers of human beings must cooperate in this manner if they are to live together as a smoothly functioning society. Our invisible governors are, in many cases, unaware of the identity of their fellow members in the inner cabinet.

They govern us by their qualities of natural leadership, their ability to supply needed ideas and by their key position in the social structure.

Whatever attitude one chooses to take toward this condition, it remains a fact that in almost every act of our daily lives, whether in the sphere of politics or business, in our social conduct or our ethical thinking, we are dominated by the relatively small number of persons - a trifling fraction of our hundred and twenty million - who understand the mental processes and social patterns of the masses.

It is they who pull the wires which control the public mind, who harness old social forces and contrive new ways to bind and guide the world.”

It is crucial to consider that the US is not a democracy, but as it was socially engineered from a republic to a so-called “democracy,” the normal state of a “democracy” is shown to be an oligarchy.  Bernays is explaining that very fact – a nation of enforced egalitarian democracy ends up being an oligarchy run by billionaire manipulators and con artists.  

Those that rule end up being the best as swaying mass man by appealing constantly to his baser desires.  In this system, the only telos is to constantly drive any and all of society towards those base desire to increase material consumption and production. The system itself has no end, other than the propagation of the parasitical system.  

Modern psy ops has only refined this technique. Retired Major Ed Rouse writes of modern psychological operations:


“Another part of the answer to this question lies in the attitude of people towards psychological operations. To some, it produces images of government controlled communications/mass media, telling the people only what the government wants them to hear.

To others, it raises the horrid specter of Joseph Goebbels, Hitler’s Propaganda Minister, practicing the technique of the “big lie” which has incorrectly become synonymous with “propaganda”. Still to others, the mere mention of “psychological” operations or warfare invokes visions of “mind control” through some mysterious means of brainwashing.

It should be clear that modern psychological operations, or PSYOP, is none of those things. On the contrary PSYOP is not unlike the public advertising that we are all exposed to wherever we go, every day, through all kinds of mass media. However the negative connotation that some people attach to the word psychological” prevents many people from recognizing the simple truth.

Everyone knows that if you do not have a good product to sell, people will not continue buying it, no matter how much you advertise. The same applies to the points of view advertised through the use of psychological operations. Thus we have no reason to fear PSYOP, but we do have ample reason to respect it for what it can do.”

There is no reason to fear Psy Ops, we are told, because it is a humane weapon. Infowar has ever been the major focus of warfare, back to Sun Tzu, who wrote that warfare’s goal was to change the enemy’s mind, not destroy his army. If the target could be changed in his thought pattern, what use in expending tremendous effort and resources on fighting a physical battle?  



But that was an older time, when nations and tribes battled one another for regional dominance and natural resources.

While this still goes on today, the top players are different: Major power blocs are battling for control of the new world order. The dominant power bloc in our world today is the Anglo banking empire, and their method of control is largely through mass media, which, as we’ve seen from the quotes above, is the same as mass advertising.  

This is why the “news” has a uniform presentation globally. The governing structure above the “government” level is that of international corporations, themselves governed by the major banking houses. Thus, the government / corporate “news” is always the same, all the way down to the local affiliate broadcasting the same laughable tabloid and warm fuzzy pieces about local kitten shelters and pharmaceutical salvation.

This was recently illustrated in a masterful way by Conan’s late night show, where pieces of local news stations were clipped together, from supposedly different stations, reading from the exact same script, nationwide. These scripts are written and sent out to the news agencies by the Pentagon and corporate central think tanks to engineer the populace into mindless abandon. 

“You don’t need us to tell you gas prices are back on the rise!”





Noted propaganda analyst Jacques Ellul posited that democratic societies even use a more sophisticated form of propaganda than authoritarian ones. A reviewer of Ellul’s famous Propaganda: The Formation of Men’s Attitudes elucidates this point:


“Ellul argues that authoritarian governments never really need propaganda as much as democratic societies do and when the authoritarian governments of the past (communist and fascist) used propaganda, it was an obvious type.

One could insinuate that it would be amateurish level and much easier to spot. Nonetheless many people in the past fell prey to this propaganda as much as people today fall prey to advertising campaigns.

A democratic society uses a more sophisticated form of propaganda, one which is long-term in process and result; again one could insinuate that this would be of a professional level and much more difficult to spot.






One of the ironies of propaganda to work is that its population must be educated. Ellul argues that the university education forms the next generation of propagandist to manipulate its society.

In other words, the more highly educated you are, the more integrated you are in this propaganda and its dissemination.

Remember Ellul is not talking about the obvious Nazi or Communist propaganda during the Second World War which was for a short-term campaign using a vertical process (top down approach easily countered by a competing top down approach).

No, Ellul is talking about the horizontal process similar to how viruses infect adjoining people around them.

Imagine an intellectual virus which spreads itself similar to a biological virus, through contact and multiply this with mass media technology as a delivery system.
One of the ironies of propaganda to work is that its population must be educated. Ellul argues that the university education forms the next generation of propagandist to manipulate its society. In other words, the more highly educated you are, the more integrated you are in this propaganda and its dissemination.

Remember Ellul is not talking about the obvious Nazi or Communist propaganda during the Second World War which was for a short-term campaign using a vertical process (top down approach easily countered by a competing top down approach). No, Ellul is talking about the horizontal process similar to how viruses infect adjoining people around them.

Imagine an intellectual virus which spreads itself similar to a biological virus, through contact and multiply this with mass media technology as a delivery system.

So the more educated you become, the less aware you are that you are a victim of propaganda and the more you are ready to spread your ideology to others who will in turn reinforce you and be reinforced by you in a horizontal process.

Leaders aren’t telling you what to think (directly), you are being told by your peers what to think and you pass along this information to others to inform them what to think.

Then when this ideology has reached a substantial portion of the population, you demand the leaders to comply and they reluctantly do so (which was their intention 30 to 40 years previously, but they won’t tell you this). This is the essence of what Ellul says in his Propaganda book.”

As you watch the snooze, er, “news,” notice the psychological tricks that are being foisted upon you. Why is the focus something mundane and irrelevant, like a celebrity’s nipple or a litter of kittens being born?  

Why are the newscasters talking to you like you’re a 5th grader? Why is the netwscast about depression followed by an ad for the pharmaceutical pill that will magickally make you happy?  

Why is the een sexting piece followed by an ad for the latest smartphone and sex app? All of this is a scientific tactic of psychological manipulation.  This is why the Pentagon places Psy Ops soldiers at local news stations.

The Infowar is the war on the public’s mind:




Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi

Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi

How Obeying The Law Will No Longer Be Enough To Protect You From The Police
May 17 2015 | From: Mirror

Now that the Lib Dem stabilisers are off, every day brings a fresh wave of worrying policy from the Tories. Comment: This is an article concerning the UK but the cabal are planning to implement the same agenda worldwide.



The Tories are planning to change our 'tolerant society'

Obeying the law will no longer be enough to guarantee you are able to live peacefully in the UK without harassment from the state.

David Cameron is set to announce a string of new powers that are seen by many as a challenge to our basic civil liberties.

This sentence from the Tory leader is particularly chilling:


"For too long, we have been a passively tolerant society, saying to our citizens 'as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone'."


What does this mean?

Well, in simple terms: obeying the law will no longer be enough to be enough to ensure you escape retribution by the authorities.

Even if you are not suspected of committing any crime, you could be hit by orders preventing you from speaking in public or associating with specific people.

The planned "snooper's charter" will give the police the right to read your private messages, even if you're not suspected of any wrongdoing. Now, it seems that if they see anything they don't like (even if it isn't criminal) they won't be obliged to leave you alone.

We know that the Tory government are also planning to scrap the current Human Rights Act and replace it with one that would introduce a "threshold below which Convention [human] rights will not be engaged" - allowing UK courts to strike out certain cases.

This could leave you with no legal recourse to challenge any controls you are subject to.

It's all a bit...


No longer a cliche, more a fact of life


Why is David Cameron doing this?

He wants to preemptively combat extremism and terrorism. But we already have a number of laws which allow police and counter-terrorism officers to monitor and arrest anybody suspected of being involved in terrorism, or in planning a terrorist attack.

Although these fundamental changes are being brought in under the guise of combating terrorism, this isn't the limit of their application.

These new changes have the potential to be used against all of us.

This tweet summarises the problem:



The Mirror and UsVsTh3m have written at length about upcoming changes planned Conservative government.

Such as plans to change constituency boundaries so that the Tories never lose another election again, plans to scrap the human rights act, and plans to introduce a 'thought crime' style "snooper's charter" which will mean all of our online behaviour and activity is monitored by the state.

But you can make a difference: 7 ways to make a difference if you oppose the Conservative government.


Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi

Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi

Zuckerberg's Internet.org Will Control What Billions Do Online
May 17 2015 | From: NoFakeInternet

We all deserve access to the real open Internet. Stand with people around the world demanding Zuckerberg stops restricting access to the open Internet.



People in countries like India, Zimbabwe, Brazil, and Paraguay are speaking out about Facebook's so-called Internet.org platform and its ability to control what billions of Internet users can do online. Zuckerberg's partnership with telecom giants, Internet.org, provides access to a fake Internet where selected services are prioritized over others. This scheme threatens innovation, free expression, and privacy online.

The fake Internet will also restrict access to local service providers struggling to get a foothold online.

We all now know Zuckerberg's Internet.org platform is not the real Internet. Not even close. Internet users around the world would rather he use his influence for good and promote access to the real open Internet, not just his fake imitation.

But their goal is control. They want to decide what you see, all while exposing you to massive security holes and vulnerabilities. Internet.org is a reckless violation of net neutrality.

What’s worse: Zuckerberg's closed Internet platform failed to consult impacted users and fundamentally undermines longstanding efforts to create affordable access to the open Internet.

Everyday users, Internet freedom groups, and prominent websites around the world oppose these types of schemes to restrict access to independent web services.

As Matias Insaurralde from Paraguay puts it: “Giving access to just a few sites in a country that historically had bad connectivity and very high costs sounds like a bad joke.”

And we know Facebook is also already moving to take control of existing users’ web surfing.

Now it's up to Internet users everywhere to make sure that the net remains free and open for us and the next wave of users.

Do your part by sending a clear message today.


Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi

Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi

Psychiatric Drugs Kill 500,000+ Western Adults Annually, Few Positive Benefits – Leading Scientist
May 15 2015 | From: RT

Psychiatric drugs lead to the deaths of over 500,000 people aged 65 and over annually in the West, a Danish scientist says. He warns the benefits of these drugs are “minimal,” and have been vastly overstated.



Research director at Denmark’s Nordic Cochrane Centre, Professor Peter Gøtzsche, says the use of most antidepressants and dementia drugs could be halted without inflicting harm on patients. The Danish scientist’s views were published in the British Medical Journal on Tuesday.

His scathing analysis will likely prove controversial among traditional medics. However, concern is mounting among doctors and scientists worldwide that psychiatric medication is doing more harm than good. In particular, they say antipsychotic drugs have been overprescribed to many dementia patients in a bid to calm agitated behavior.

Gøtzsche warns psychiatric drugs kill patients year in year out, and hold few positive benefits. He says in excess of half a million citizens across the Western world aged 65 and over die annually as a result of taking these drugs.


“Their benefits would need to be colossal to justify this, but they are minimal,” he writes.

“Given their lack of benefit, I estimate we could stop almost all psychotropic drugs without causing harm.”

Gøtzsche, who is also a clinical trials expert, says drug trials funded by big pharmaceutical companies tend to produce biased results because many patients took other medication prior to the tests.

He says patients cease taking the old drugs and then experience a phase of withdrawal prior to taking the trial pharmaceuticals, which appear highly beneficial at first.

The Danish professor also warns fatalities from suicides in clinical trials are significantly under-reported.

In the case of antidepressants venlafaxine and fluoxetine, Gøtzsche casts doubt over their efficacy. He said depression lifts in placebo groups given fake tablets almost as promptly as groups who partake in official clinical tests.

He also stressed the results of trials of drugs used to treat schizophrenia are disconcerting, while those for ADHD are ambiguous. Commenting on the negative side effects of such pharmaceutical drugs, Gøtzsche argued the “short-term relief” appears to be replaced by “long term harm.”


“Animal studies strongly suggest that these drugs can produce brain damage, which is probably the case for all psychotropic drugs,” he said.

“Given their lack of benefit, I estimate we could stop almost all psychotropic drugs without causing harm – by dropping all antidepressants, ADHD drugs and dementia drugs … and using only a fraction of the antipsychotics and benzodiazepines we currently use.”

“This would lead to healthier and more long-lived populations.”

Gøtzsche says psychotropic drugs are “immensely harmful” if used for prolonged periods.


“They should almost exclusively be used in acute situations and always with a firm plan for tapering off, which can be difficult for many patients,” he adds.

Gøtzsche’s views are sharply contradicted by many experts in the field of mental health. But others, including a diverse group of medical experts and institutions affiliated with the Nordic Cochrane Centre, argue otherwise. The Nordic Cochrane Centre is an independent research hub dedicated to scrutinizing and monitoring the effects of health care.

The debate on psychiatric drugs has gathered momentum in recent times. In the discussion, published in the British Medical Journal (BMJ), Gøtzsche’s arguments are contradicted by Professor of Mood Disorders Allan Young and John Crace. Crace, himself a psychiatric patient, writes for the Guardian.



US spends most on this drug… and no one knows how it works

Crace and Young say a broad body of research indicates the drugs are effective and that they are just as helpful as drugs for other ailments. They also argue mental health conditions are the fifth most significant contributor to disabilities worldwide.

While Gøtzsche stresses clinical trials bankrolled by pharma giants churn out skewered results, Young and Crace say the efficacy and safety of psychiatric medication continues to be monitored after research trials come to a close.

However, both Young and Crace acknowledge concern over the side effects and effectiveness of psychiatric medication.


For some critics, the onus often seems to be on the drug needing to prove innocence from causing harm rather than a balanced approach to evaluating the available evidence,” they write.

“Whether concerns are genuine or an expression of prejudice is not clear, but over time many concerns have been found to be overinflated.”

The BMJ discussion is a preamble to the Maudsley debate at Kings College London on Wednesday. The debate takes place three times a year at the university’s Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience (IoPPN).

Wednesday’s debate focuses on the impacts of psychiatric medications, and poses the question of whether they prove more destructive for patients than beneficial.


Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi

Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi

Mega-Banks Are On The Brink Of Failure Again: 'The Damage Will Not Be Contained'
May 15 2015 | From: Sott

The banksters, who nearly tanked the global market in their collective effort to loot the peoples of the world, are operating out of "larger than ever" big banks.



They are not only "too big to fail," but too big to contain. The derivatives have not been stopped or controlled; leveraging ratios are still out of control; and bank runs could happen at anytime, subjecting big banks to desperate calls on cash they would be unable to fulfill; apparently everything they have is loaned out and sometimes demanded back "each and every day."

The entire thing is a dangerous high wire act that looms over our otherwise ordinary lives with great peril.

The Corporate Reform Coalition (CRC) did a study titled Still Too Big to Fail (PDF) that underscores the dangers of the current funny money schemes and the fact that even the weak-kneed requirements of the Dodd-Frank "Wall Street Reform Act" have not been fulfilled.

Big surprise:


"The top six bank holding companies are considerably larger than before, and are still permitted to borrow excessively relative to the assets they hold," the report states.

"They are dangerously interconnected and remain vulnerable to sudden runs, because they borrow billions of dollars from wholesale lenders who can often demand their cash back each and every day."

It goes on: "Banks can still use taxpayer-backed insured deposits to engage in high-risk derivative transactions here and overseas. Compensation incentives fail to discourage mismanagement and illegality, given that when legal fees, settlements, and fines mount, it is usually the shareholders, not the corporate executives who pay."

And, the report warns, "[s]hould one of these giant banking firms fail again, it appears that the damage will not be contained."

"Avoiding another meltdown depends on the will of federal regulators to use the new powers they were granted in the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act," said Jennifer Taub, author of the report and professor of law at Vermont Law School. "If they behave as if they are beholden to the banks, we will likely face a more severe crisis in the future."

So, we are admittedly completely vulnerable to another devastating economic meltdown... and virtually nothing can stop the contagion completely pandemic and global in proportions. Brace yourself and breathe.

Among the many other details setting the stage for another market conniption fit and another round of banksters behaving badly is the Federal Reserve, which is not only set to drop a bomb if it announces a rate increase, but who are scrambling to keep their power unchecked and unwatched by the public sector.

Washington lawyers are introducing legislation attempting limit the Fed's ability to unleash the floodgates and use "emergency loans" as a means of pipeline-delivered liquidity for the 'Too Big to Fail Banks' - rightly criticized as a "backdoor bailout."

This easy money continues today under QE3 and has driven investor interest rates to below 0%, shafting savers, pensioners, insurance holdings and middle class America in general.

This on-going "emergency" to manipulate the money supply is reaching catastrophic proportions. While no single act of Congress is going to reverse the magnitude of these economic events, the unprecedented power of the Federal Reserve undoubtedly deserves scrutiny:


The Federal Reserve's ability to give emergency loans to distressed institutions in a crisis would be restricted under legislation being prepared by lawmakers who want to stop "backdoor bailouts".

The Fed contained panic during the crisis by offering emergency loans to institutions facing liquidity crunches. But, after the meltdown, Congress introduced restrictions to prevent the bailout of single struggling entities, while preserving Fed powers to provide liquidity to groups of firms.

And voices from the Federal Reserve are ready to scream about the sky falling if their power is threatened:


Jerome Powell, a Fed governor, said in February that "it would be a mistake to go further [than the Dodd-Frank amendments] and impose additional restrictions."

He added: "Because we cannot anticipate what may be needed in the future, the Congress should preserve the ability of the Fed to respond flexibly and nimbly to future emergencies."

So, everything is at risk. Nothing has changed. Our lives are at risk. And later they will say no one saw it coming, even though everyone is pointing out how ominous and foreboding things already look.

Comment: While this article is both timely and relevant, do not let it take you into fear. There are efforts afoot on multiple fronts to mitigate any negative eventuality - if such destructive outcomes are even able to take place.


Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi

Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi

Demons Behind The Music Industry (Ex Illuminati Explains) &
Illuminati - The Music Industry Exposed
May 13 2015 | From: JohnTodd / Farhank

John Todd, former member of the Illuminati and music industry insider speaks out, plus a truly excellent documentary on what really goes on within the music industry.



Related: The Record Industry Pushed Gangster Rap As a Favor to Friends in the Prison Industry

Related: How The Illuminati uses media to Control Your Mind

I made an interesting discovery which may back up my video Demons Behind The Music Industry.

In the video John Todd mentions the album Destroyer by KISS. If you look on the cover of the album you can see the KISS members standing on rocks (or coals) above what looks like a lake of fire with smoke in the background, and it has a dark sky.

The Bible says in Revelation 9:2 -


"And he opened the bottomless pit; and there arose a smoke out of the pit, as the smoke of a great furnace; and the sun and the air were darkened by reason of the smoke of the pit."

In verses 7 and 8 it goes on to say that the faces of the locusts that came out of the pit had faces of men and hair as the hair of women. If you look at the KISS album cover Destroyer they have faces of men and long hair like women.

The king of these locusts from the pit is called Apollyon.

Now if you check the name Apollyon in the dictionary guess what it means? It means the DESTROYER which is the title of KISS's album. Coincidence? You decide.



Demons Behind The Music Industry (Ex Illuminati Explains)




Illuminati - The Music Industry Exposed




Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi

Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi

Secret Space Program: Countdown To Exposure On All Illuminati Fronts
May 12 2015 | From: DivineCosmos

The truth is far, far stranger than fiction. We can barely even imagine the world we will have once the Secret Space Program is exposed and the change is complete. Very tangible steps are now being made in that direction. This article goes beyond the Secret Space Program [which is comprised of a number of factions including one known as 'Solar Warden'] and provides an in-depth look into the core principles, beliefs and objectives of the Illuminati by way of some of their key projects.



It is difficult to imagine what disclosure will really be like. Are we surrounded by multiple different groups of intelligent, humanlike ET's? Have they been interacting with our planet throughout our entire recorded history?

For some, the answer has become "Yes, of course."

Once this becomes common knowledge, the effect on our civilization will be undeniably vast, revolutionary and unstoppable. The wait for an official disclosure -- for any type of formal acknowledgement of the truth -- has been agonizingly slow and protracted.

It is easy to lose hope; to feel beaten down and defeated by seeing the same old games playing themselves out over and over again. However, the fact that "full disclosure" hasn't happened yet doesn't mean that it won't.

The forces preventing disclosure seem all-powerful to many who have studied this -- but bigger kids on the playground have since arrived.


The Alliance is Absolutely Real

We have been fortunate enough to have direct contact with insiders who are working for a secret alliance that is actively defeating the Powers That Were.

How did this happen? Part of it was the legacy: we have maintained an online platform since 1996, and launched this website [divinecosmos.com] in February 1999. The Internet was so new when we started that there were hundreds of paranormal subjects where we were the only site that came up on keyword searches.

I do feel very blessed to be where I am. Working 14+ hours a day, 7 days a week on this stuff since July 1998 has been a labor of love and service.

By May 2001 I had already written three full-length books on cutting-edge alternative science entitled the Convergence series, and published them here for free.

The cool part about gaining the trust of insiders is the longer you last and the more of them you know, the more likely you are to have new people show up.

One of those insiders has now come forward in video testimony we taped here at Divine Cosmos headquarters, and will be releasing for free on YouTube once the massive scope of the project is complete.

For those who are already clamoring for it, bear in mind that quality is much more important than speed with something this significant. With that being said, the Alliance is urging us to finish it as soon as possible.  :)

"Remember Back in the Old Days?"

The Cabal responsible for the cover-up is not going to stay secret much longer. We will soon have a surprise that dwarfs any other event in recorded history.

Everyone's lives will be irreversibly altered once this event happens. All prior movies, TV shows and media discussions will immediately become hopelessly outdated - like folksy black-and-white programs from "the old days."



Many aspects of our society, including popular movies and music, will be forever altered in the eyes of the public.

We will learn that the same group has been covertly manipulating our society and creating wars since at least the times of the Roman Empire. There will be a tremendous amount of shock and surprise - but also relief that the torture finally came to an end.

The people who risked their lives to tell others the truth will suddenly go from zeroes to heroes. The paparazzi will have a whole new slew of public figures to start shoving their cameras and microphones at.

Additionally, once this process begins, it won't take long before we hear absolute proof that we are "not alone."


The ET's Must Follow a Prime Directive

There are innumerable, very strong reasons to believe that ETs do exist, and are following a "Prime Directive." They are not allowed to interfere with our history and reveal themselves to us openly until we are ready for them to appear.

That time may be approaching much sooner than we think. Exposing and defeating the mind control of the "Bad Guys" is a key part of this process.

In Part Two we will survey multiple, interlocking pieces of evidence in favor of near-term disclosure -- far more dramatic than most people are expecting. The rewards of this happening are so huge that it is well worth the effort to track the astonishing evidence we see as it gets closer and closer.


Disclosure Will Provide a Golden Age

Disclosure will bring many wonderful fruits - such as free energy, anti-gravity, stargate travel, healing technology and materializer technology.

It will also pave the way for open interaction with benevolent human ETs - a dream that many cannot even imagine ever actually happening.



This is not going to be some tear-jerking, sci-fi payoff ending that we revel in for a few precious minutes, only to "wake up" and return to our normal, mundane lives. Worldwide ancient prophecies describing a "Golden Age" - remarkably different than what we have right now - will soon be fulfilled.

Our planet will become the peaceful oasis that we always wanted it to be - without having to indulge in increasingly escapist "wishful thinking" to imagine.

The universe is not built for intelligent civilizations to live in as much fear and pain as we have been doing here. That is a very transient phase that usually passes by quickly - in the grand scheme of things.

Now it is almost time for us to leave the nest, and join a greater community of peaceful interstellar explorers helping others.


Only a Small Group Stands in the Way

A small group, dwindling in power by the day, is the only thing holding us back from a Star Trek-type society that could literally be ours in a matter of months.

This group is in serious trouble. They are losing the war on every front. Mass defections have already started, and have become much greater in recent weeks. Multiple "factions within factions" are forming as everyone turns on each other - including the very highest levels betraying everyone below them.

Very high-level witnesses have already been taken to secure locations in advance of an epic series of events that will soon unfold on earth. These epic, civilization-defining events may come to be called the Illuminati Tribunals.

The Illuminati Tribunals will be the greatest, most watched TV event in the history of broadcast media. They will be extremely unexpected and revealing, and bursting with new information.



Some of the most famous faces on earth will be directly involved - and we will see a side of them no one ever would have expected. Everything we thought we knew about our world - as well as almost all of recorded history - will have changed instantly.

Overnight. Information will start coming at us so quickly that the "learning curve" will be staggering - even for those who thought they knew it all.

Absolute video proof that 9/11 was a staged, self-inflicted wound by the American leadership structure will only be the very beginning of what we see.

No One Really Expects it Until it Happens

Much like any other political upheaval in history, most of the planning is done in the strictest of secrecy until the change actually appears. This is even more necessary when standing up to a group that has access to almost universal surveillance of all forms of communication.



The clues of an epic change are out there, and have become increasingly obvious - but for many, no level of proof will ever convince them.

It will only be once the mega-event starts happening - probably every bit as jarring and unexpected as 9/11 in the early stages - that most people will be forced to acknowledge it.

The trigger for these epic changes will apparently be a major economic upheaval, including Uncle Sam asking to steal your wallet so he can pay for his Rolls-Royces.

"Bail-ins," where the government forcibly robs your bank account to pay off its own bad debts, will likely be the final spark that leads to the Tribunals.



There are plans in place to restore and greatly improve the financial system, so this "all is lost" moment would be extremely frustrating, but also temporary. No one within the Alliance is going to "flip the switch" on the final stage of this plan until the public is angry enough that they want to see it happen.

Please bear in mind that we cannot solve this problem by ignoring it. This will be a very positive change. We will get our money back, and much, much more. The rest of Part One is material the Alliance has specifically requested that we share with you, as it is utterly essential that we all "wake up" and see the truth in order to heal.

You Are Part of the Solution

What if these epic prophecies don't just "come true" by some "universal law?" What if we have to create the future we want to live in? How you think, how you feel and how you act matters far more than you may realize.

If so, that means you are part of the solution. How you think, how you feel and how you act matters far more than you may realize. You are not just living in a bubble, watching some grand magic show that you are disconnected from.

We are active participants in a shared, co-creative reality. There is abundant scientific proof that this is how the universe really works.

That data has been widely and ruthlessly suppressed.

Read the full story at: DivineCosmos



Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi

Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi

Have You Ever Felt Like The Government Doesn’t Really Care What You Think?
May 12 2015 | From:RepresentUs

Professors Martin Gilens (Princeton University) and Benjamin I. Page (Northwestern University) looked at more than 20 years worth of data to answer a simple question: Does the government represent the people?



Their study [which took place in the US but which is equally applicable to all other western countries] took data from nearly 2000 public opinion surveys and compared it to the policies that ended up becoming law.

In other words, they compared what the public wanted to what the government actually did. What they found was extremely unsettling: The opinions of 90% of Americans has essentially no impact at all.

This video gives a quick rundown of their findings — it all boils down to one simple graph: 



Read more at: RepresentUs


Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi

Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi

Military Electronic Warfare Expert Warns Of Covert Genocide
May 10 2015 | From: ChemtrailsPlanet

Since the 1950s, Soviet/Russian and U.S. Militaries have  been researching electromagnetic frequencies to determine which are the most harmful to humans



The statement coincided with a visit from the UN's top climate negotiator.

Maurice Newman, chairman of Prime Minister Tony Abbott's business advisory council, said the UN is using false models which show sustained temperature increases because it wants to end democracy and impose authoritarian rule.


April 29, 2015

James G. (“Jerry”) Flynn, Captain (Retired)
5181 Gainsberg Road,
Bowser, B.C., V0R 1G0
778 424-9609

Parliamentary Health Committee (HESA) 2015
Ottawa, ON. Canada

Dear Committee Members,

Safety Code 6 plus Corruption = An Emerging Genocide!

Distinguished international scientists and leading health researchers in the recondite science of non-ionizing radiation know that the most dangerous threat to human health – EVER – is the ongoing, unchecked proliferation of wireless radio devices, such as Smart Meters, baby monitors, cell phones, cell phone towers, cordless phones, Wi-Fi routers, Wi-Fi and WiMAX installations (which can blanket entire major cities!), GPS, Bluetooth, tablet and laptop computers, Interactive TV games, RFIDs, etc., all of which emit toxic “low-level, pulsed, non-thermal radio frequency (RF) radiation”!

For clarity, “microwaves” are electromagnetic waves with frequencies between 300 MHz (0.3 GHz) and 300 GHz in the RF spectrum, which spans from 3 kHz to 300 GHz.

I am a retired Canadian Armed Forces captain who spent 22 of my 26 years in the military in the arcane fields of Electronic Warfare (EW) and Signals Intelligence (SIGINT).

At the zenith of my career, I was the Executive Officer and Operations Officer at one of Canada’s largest and most sensitive intelligence-gathering stations, where for two years I personally directed some 200-plus specially-trained radio operators and technicians. Subsequently, I was posted into National Defense Headquarters (NDHQ), Ottawa, into the Directorate of Electronic Warfare (DEW).

In this two-year period, I worked closely with U.S., Canadian and NATA army E.W. units, completed a lengthy NATO army EW officers’ course in Anzio, Italy and participated in a major NATO army EW field exercise in the Black Forest of Germany.

Earlier in my career, I conducted EW aboard two Canadian warships in exercises with Canadian, U.S. and other international naval allies. My bread and butter for more than 22 years was the radio frequency (RF) spectrum.

Military History

All governments need to realize that, since at least the 1950s, Soviet/Russian and U.S. Militaries have each spent vast sums of money painstakingly studying and cataloguing all RF frequencies to determine which are the most harmful to humans!

The Soviets irradiated the U.S. Embassy in Moscow for 23 years (1953-1976) for just 6-8 hours a day, five days a week, using similar frequencies, similar modulations, and even less power than are used in today’s Smart Meters, baby monitors, cell phones, etc.!

Even though the Embassy was irradiated for what amounted to just 25% of the time, three U.S. ambassadors died: two from cancer, one from Leukemia-like symptoms; 16 women developed breast cancer, and most other staff suffered illnesses of some sort.

The U.S. military responded by launching its Project Pandora (1954-1971), from which they too learned which specific frequencies, with which modulations, at what power densities had the most devastating effects on humans – which included: cancers, heart attacks, hysteria, trauma, suicides, etc.

Governments need to realize that all modern militaries now possess ever-expanding arsenals of EW weapons, which use precisely the same RF frequencies that inexcusably ignorant Industry Canada today permits wireless and telecom companies, and now utilities, to utilize in their wireless products (see below)! Militaries have long known that:

  • Microwaves are the “perfect” weapon, for one cannot hear, see, smell, taste or feel them, plus they leave no trace of evidence!

  • Frequencies within the band 900 MHz (or 0.9 GHz) to 5 GHz are the most lethal against humans because they penetrate more deeply all organ systems of the body and therefore put all human organs at risk!
    (Yet Industry Canada has authorized baby monitors, Smart Meters and all of today’s other wireless devices to operate in this very band of frequencies!)

  • ‘Pulsed’ radiation is more harmful to humans than is “continuous wave” radiation.
    (Yet Industry Canada permits today’s wireless products to emit pulsed radiation!)

  • The harmful effects of EMR (electromagnetic radiation) are cumulative; they add up!

  • Certain frequencies are unique in that the weakest levels of radiation, for reasons unknown, cause more harm to humans than does more powerful radiation.

  • Soviet/Russian scientists produced thousands of studies, which were offered to the West, showing that non-thermal radiation (the kind emitted by today’s wireless products) is harmful to all life forms. Both the corrupt WHO (World Health Organization) and ICNIRP (International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection) – who study only thermal radiation – refused the offer, thus denying Western scientists the opportunity to learn about non-thermal radiation from the Soviet/Russian studies!

  • http://www.weepinitiative.org/LINKEDDOCS/scientific/20080117_bevington_emfs.pdf

  • http://www.emfacts.com/2012/08/rncnirp-to-issue-report-on-russian-rf-research/

Non-Military Science

Distinguished scientists and leading health researchers around the globe know that:

  • There is no such thing as a ‘safe’ threshold of radiation; the only ‘safe’ level is zero!

  • The non-thermal RF radiation (also called EMR) emitted by all wireless devices is cumulative; it all combines and blends together, like an ever-thickening fog!

  • Non-thermal EMR causes, promotes or is linked to the exponential rise in all of today’s major illnesses, including all cancers, ADHD, asthma, Multiple Sclerosis, leukemia, Alzheimer’s, dementia, Autism, ADD, Parkinson’s, ALS, etc. (Yet Health Canada refuses to admit this!)

  • Cancers and other major diseases have a latency period of 10-15 years or more!

  • Cell phones have never been tested for ‘safety’ in any jurisdiction to prove they can be used by and/or around people on a continuous 24/7/365 basis, in perpetuity)!

  • In 1984, the U.S. FDA (Food and Drug Administration) exempted cell phones from having to undergo mandatory ‘pre-market’ testing because industry convinced them that cell phone radiation was too weak to be of concern. This opened the flood-gates for today’s constellation of wireless devices, including Smart Meters, all of which use the same technology on similar frequencies!

  • Not one peer-reviewed scientific study exists – anywhere – showing that cell phones are safe!

  • The U.S. Cell phone industry’s own six-year study ($28.5-million USD, in ’93-’99) showed they are not safe!

  • All cell phone Owner Manuals contain, in very fine print, warnings for the user not to hold the phone closer than, in the case of Blackberry – 0.98”; Apple – 5/8”; Motorola – 1” from any part of the body – not just the head!

  • Since 2001 Motorola, Nokia, Siemens and other cell phone companies have taken out global patents that acknowledge cell phone radiation can lead to cancers!

  • Wireless and cell phone companies, and electric utilities cannot get insurance against health-related claims attributed to wireless radiation!

  • In 2010, CTIA’s (Cellular Telecommunications Internet Association)’s own Sr. VP External and State Affairs told a public audience in California: “I have not told you once, not once, that cell phones are safe; The FCC is telling you they are safe!” (CTIA is the industry’s association that lobbies all levels of government across the U.S. on behalf of its members)

It is absolutely frightening to realize how completely inept and negligent the Government of Canada has been since the 1980s in fulfilling its duty to protect the public from the toxic non-thermal EMR” emitted by wireless radio devices!

Aside from Health Canada – who are notoriously corrupt, dating back to the 1970s – not one competent senior health authority exists – either in Ottawa or in any of the provinces – who has any meaningful knowledge of or expertise in this form of radiation – which is literally everywhere today!

This means that: No provincial Minister of Health; No provincial senior public health officer (PHO); No national Chief PHO; No member of Canada’s “Pan-Canadian Public Health Network”; Nor, I suspect, any senior member of the Canadian Medical Association (CMA) is capable of protecting the Canadian public, because they are all ignorant of non-thermal EMR – which Health Canada steadfastly insists does not harm people! Shocking! Disgraceful! Absolutely criminal!

It is impossible to exaggerate the unprecedented danger all Canadians find themselves in today (as is the case for most people in the world), which could not possibly have happened had this admittedly recondite subject matter (non-ionizing radiation) been taught to aspiring medical doctors in medical schools; been recognized or understood by the CMA; or had our series of national Chief PHOs been selected more carefully.

With no one to provide oversight, Health Canada continues to be able to do much as it pleases. One has only to Google: “Michael Repacholi, World Health Organization, Corruption,” to gain a glimpse of the corruption just one scientist brought, not only to Health Canada, but to ICNIRP and then to the WHO itself! Another glimpse can be had by Googling: “Health Canada, Conflict of Interest, Sharon Noble.

All governments in Canada and the public need to also note that, with no competent health authority to question or challenge its decisions, Health Canada has been free to promulgate a ‘one size fits all’ radiation Exposure Limit in Safety Code 6, which applies to all Canadians – regardless of size or the state of one’s health!

It makes no distinction between tiny developing embryos, pregnant women, newborn babies, children, normal-sized adults, huge men and women, the sick and elderly! Yet scientists have known for years that a baby’s skull absorbs at least five (5) times as much radiation as does an adult’s!

All levels of government, all health care authorities across Canada, and the CMA itself need to wake up and realize that both Health Canada and Industry Canada are – and have been for decades – deeply embedded with what has become a corrupt cartel of the four radiation Regulatory Agencies: WHO, ICNIRP, IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers) and the FCC (Federal Communications Commission).

All share similar egregiously high radiation Exposure Limits – which are amongst the highest/most dangerous in the world! All have strong ties to the electricity industry! http://www.next-up.org/pdf/who_conflict.pdf

Neither Health Canada nor any of its corrupt cartel colleagues will recognize (admit) that:

  • Non-thermal EMR can be harmful to humans and all life forms!
    (Their collective position is: “If the radiation does not heat the skin, it cannot be harmful”!)

  • Powerline (60 Hz) electric and magnetic fields (EMFs) are harmful to people!
    (Scientists say that a safe ambient level of EMFs in a home would be not more than 1 mG (milliGauss)! They’ve known for decades that an ambient level of just 3-4 mG causes Leukemia in children! Russia allows up to 1.5 mG; Sweden, up to 2.5 mG!
    Note: Contrast the above with all members of the ‘Western cartel; who are tied to the electricity industry: Health Canada – says EMFs have not been proven harmful, and therefore it allows EMFs up to 1,000 m’G! IEEE – allows up to 10,000 mG! ICNIRP and WHO – both allow 2,000 mG for short term exposure in residences, and up to 9,000 mG for short term occupational exposure! http://www.next-up.org/pdf/who_conflict.pdf

  • EHS is a legitimate impairment or disability people experience when constantly exposed to EMR and/or EMFs! (Discovered by German scientists in 1932, the WHO finally recognized EHS in 2005, as have many countries of the world. It is known that Nikola Tesla was EHS!

  • http://www.weepinitiative.org/LINKEDDOCS/scientific/20080117_bevington_emfs.pdf

Governments must no longer ignore what the Soviet/Russian and U.S. Militaries learned from their seven-decades-long exhaustive research:

a) microwaves are the perfect military weapon;

b) low-level, pulsed, non-thermal radiation – at even the weakest levels – is harmful to all living things; and,

c) the most lethal frequencies within the entire RF band are between 900 MHz to 5 GHz – and are particularly lethal to a human’s central nervous system and immune system.

Any EMR emitted on microwave frequencies is a potential weapon – not a consumer product!

That Industry Canada could see fit to permit today’s wireless radio devices, such as Smart Meters, baby monitors, cell phones, etc., to utilize the above-mentioned band of lethal frequencies speaks volumes for their gross ignorance of what militaries have long known.

There exist today literally thousands of studies done by honest scientists from around the world showing that any wireless radio device is harmful to people, flora and fauna! The evidence is simply too compelling. In all decency, it must no longer be ignored!

In closing, I have evidence to support everything I have said above. My earnest hope is that each of you is now better able to understand today’s reality.

One cannot exaggerate the scale and scope of today’s corruption — that now literally threatens the entire globe! Unless you and other honest elected officials elsewhere put a stop to this insanity, mankind’s worst-ever genocide will become a reality! I am available to answer questions. Thank you for your time.
Sincerely,

Jerry Flynn
James G. (“Jerry”) Flynn, Captain (Retired)
5181 Gainsberg Road,
Bowser, B.C., V0R 1G0
778 424-9609



Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi

Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi

Climate Change Is UN-Led Hoax To Create 'New World Order': Australian Prime Minister's Chief Business Adviser
May 9 2015 | From: RT

The Australian Prime Minister's chief business adviser says that climate change is a ruse led by the United Nations to create a new world order under the agency's control.



The statement coincided with a visit from the UN's top climate negotiator.

Maurice Newman, chairman of Prime Minister Tony Abbott's business advisory council, said the UN is using false models which show sustained temperature increases because it wants to end democracy and impose authoritarian rule.


"It's a well-kept secret, but 95 percent of the climate models we are told prove the link between human CO2 emissions and catastrophic global warming have been found, after nearly two decades of temperature stasis, to be in error," he wrote in an opinion piece published in The Australian newspaper on Friday, without providing evidence.

"The real agenda is concentrated political authority. Global warming is the hook,” he said, adding that the UN is against capitalism and freedom and wants to create a “new world order.”

The adviser's inflammatory comments coincided with a visit from UN climate chief Christiana Figueres.

According to Newman, Figueres is:


"on record saying democracy is a poor political system for fighting global warming."

Communist China, she says, "is the best model.”

Figueres was in Australia to discuss practical climate change action, urging the country to move away from heavily polluting coal production. She also urged Australia to play a leading role at the climate summit in Paris in December.

But that call is unlikely to be heeded. During November's G20 meeting in Brisbane, Abbott warned that the Paris summit would fail if world leaders decided prioritize the cutting of carbon emissions over economic growth.

Abbott, who called the science behind climate change “crap” in 2009, also repealed a tax on carbon pricing and abolished the independent Climate Commission advisory body in Australia.

The prime minister has been reluctant to take part in climate change politics, trying but failing to keep it off the agenda at last year's G20 summit.

Both Abbott's office and the United Nations have so far declined to comment on Newman's statements.

A well-known climate change skeptic, Newman has made similar provocative comments in the past, calling the notion a “myth” and a “delusion.”

In February, he criticized renewable energy policies. Citing British charity Age UK, he stated that elderly citizens in Britain often die of “winter deaths” because they can't afford power. He blamed renewable energy policies which drive up the price of energy.

However, when asked about his claim by The Guardian, the charity sent back a statement which referenced high energy costs, but failed to mention anything about renewable energy.

Just a few months earlier, in November 2014, Newman cited a Scottish government-commissioned study which allegedly said that for every job in the renewable sector, 3.7 jobs were lost elsewhere.

However, the report itself made no mention that it was commissioned by the government.

In fact, the government called the study “misleading,” adding that the industry would actually have the opposite effect on jobs.

According to the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the global mean temperature could rise by up to 4.8° Celsius (40.6° Fahrenheit) this century alone. The prediction is seen as a recipe for droughts, floods and rising seas.

Comment: Aside from all of the post-statement twaddle, it is in the very least interesting to see such matters considered in a public mainstream media outlet. While there are mixed sentiments in the above, a formerly taboo viewpoint has at least been forced into the mainstream.


Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi

Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi

10 Hopeful Signs That The New World Order Is Dying
May 8 2015 | From: WakingTimes

We know the saying, you either see a glass half empty or half full. Your attitude, mindset and expectations guide your perceptions which in turn will guide your stated views and opinions of the world you live in



That said, depending on how you view the world one might make an argument for why the new world order is slowly dying out.

Perhaps I’m being overly optimistic or perhaps my intuition is correct on this one. One thing I strongly believe: humanity is not designed to live in false government paradigms of slavery and statism.

Those who live for government and the state will hold these beliefs, but nature and the rest of humanity tells another story. Humanity naturally yearns to be free of all control systems.

Though a certain percentage of humanity actually needs and wants to be under the control of government, this segment of humanity only wishes this because they know nothing else and they are afraid of a stateless world where they might have to care for themselves.

For now, let’s set aside these individuals who live in fear and need the state to be part of their lives, and let’s focus instead on the rest of humanity who is awakened. Let’s realise how amazing, gifted and how blessed we are as humans, and how natural it is to be free.

For those of us who have moved past the modern-day mental enslavement at the hands of the control system, it is much easier to see the victories being chalked up by humanity with every day that goes by.

For those of us who are committed to viewing the world in a positive way, it is not very difficult to glance at some of the recent headlines and see where once again there are signs that show that new world order globalist elite plan at global enslavement may be postponed indefinitely.

That is, the new world order is failing even though they are very much fighting back and doing everything they can to continue pushing their plan forward.

Here are just 10 recent stories that indicate the new world order could in fact be slowly dying out.
These 10 stories barely scratch the surface of things that are happening at the local level everywhere in the U.S. and around the world. People really are beginning to realize that the wealthy elites and governments are the root of the problem.

People are realizing how corrupt they are and how they intend to enslave us all forever. Many people are starting to see the bigger picture and this is driving a new consciousness.

1. Baltimore cops criminally charged

Not long ago in America we saw multiple cases where police murdered unarmed civilians. From Michael Brown to Eric Garner, for months we’ve seen injustice as police literally get away with cold-blooded murder. For a change, however, we are now seeing multiple police officers profiled before America as ordinary criminals.

Finally we are building the courage here in the U.S. to confront police homicide. We are finally willing to see a person for what they are without a badge distorting your perception of the truth.

Slowly the paradigm shift of judging police for their actions is headed in the direction of becoming the norm. Yes we have a long way to go, but we are headed in the right direction.

2. Montana passes law to nullify militarization of police

In Montana Governor Steve Bullock signed a law essentially protecting the state of Montana from becoming an arm of the federal government and being given military equipment.

House bill 330 protects the independence of Montana’s law enforcement. How big a paradigm shift is this? This is a direct result of humanity waking up to the police state which is a big part of the new world order plans.

A law like this would never have been considered were it not for the expanding and noticeable militarized police state.

Americans everywhere are now seeing the end result of a violent police state which attacks with immunity. People everywhere are sick and tired of the videos and images showing police in military gear, tanks, and unnecessary weapons. These images imprint in our minds and eventually carry over to action.

3. Jade Helm cancelled in parts of Colorado and Texas after strong opposition

Bad enough that operation Jade Helm is occurring right here in the U.S. starting this July. The good news is that in a short period of time the military operation has received so much attention that already we’re seeing cancellations in certain parts of Texas and Colorado. If there is any silver lining it is that when enough people speak out someone will listen.



4. Not enough votes in Congress to reauthorise Patriot Act

Will the Patriot Act actually go away? Who knows, but even if it doesn’t go away now, think of how many more people are now aware that perhaps it’s time to say goodbye to the Patriot Act.

Only time will tell what eventually happens with the Patriot Act. According to Michigan Congressman Justin Amash there are not enough votes. It is not difficult to see that the longstanding pushback against the Patriot Act is definitely there and may be finally coming to fruition.

Should the Patriot Act finally go away, it would be a huge blow to the new world order plans. For that reason we should expect strong opposition to the idea of not renewing the Act.

5. Polls show young Americans are skeptical of Global Warming

Even in 2015, the year of the planned return of the “global warming” hoax theme disguised under the “climate change” banner, it may appear the young generation is not fooled by the global elite climate religion agenda concocted in the late 1950s and initiated in the 1960s by the Club of Rome.

Despite that the climate change movement is in full gear this year, people are holding on to their common sense, critical thinking and rational thought and have not fallen for the agenda.

Anyone can clearly see that the Climate Change hoax completely ignores the greatest threat to the planet and that is the planned, documented and carried out geoengineering spaying of our planet.

As humanity watches in horror as our blue skies and fluffy white clouds turn to nasty feathery linear tic-tac-toe skies, the climate change hoaxer watches in a silence of betrayal, not willing to say a word to expose the 150 patents the Department of Defense has for spraying our skies.

That youngsters are on to some of this and/or are not buying the global warming lie is another sign that we are headed in the right direction in terms of overall human consciousness and awakening, thus bad news for the new world order.


6. Chipotle Mexican Grill becomes first fast food restaurant to reject GMOs.

A clear blow to the new world order and Monsanto, a company very much at the core of most genetic engineering of food. Chipotle Mexican Grill is now the first of many other fast food chains who will hopefully do the same.

Soon we hope to see a trend of other restaurant chains dropping GMOs all together. I expect that consumer demand may play a role in making Genetically Modified Organism food obsolete.

As time goes by more and more people are finding out about the dangers of GMOs.

People are now becoming familiar with the Seralini studies
which proved the cancer-causing risk of GMO foods.

Soon, many millions more will start to think about GMOs as a result of this decision by Chipotle. Another example of how Monsanto and the new world order may be losing its tight grip on humanity.


7. 30,000 doctors in Argentina demand ban of Monsanto’s glyphosate

As with the Chipotle story, that 30,000-plus doctors are willing to get together to try and make a difference in their country is remarkable and could present another death blow to Monsanto who makes glyphosate.

Let’s not forget that every victory to ban GMOs is a huge victory against the new world order.

Hopefully in the coming years we will see more action like this taken by other countries.


8. TPP opposition growing. Obama increasingly frustrated

Obama’s super secret Trans Pacific Partnership agreement is struggling.

People are quickly deducing that secret = bad.

No good plan is held in secret from the public and nothing good could even come out of a plan that undermines individual sovereignty globally.

We can expect opposition to the TPP to only grow. Now is the time to get familiar with TPP and all that is happening surrounding this weird international secret trade agreement. The TPP is also integral to the new world order plans, therefore let us keep fighting to expose this.


9. Obama’s own brother says Barack is a ruthless, cold, deceitful liar

This story may seem like an odd one to include here but is it really?

Foreign born Barry Soetoro, aka Barack Obama, has been exposed as a fraud since before he was elected in 2008 when many things about his past first came out.

So why is this story important? And how is this a sign that the new world order could be crumbling?

Because throughout history brothers of the sitting president don’t usually come out and boldly tell the world their own brother is a liar, and a ruthless person.

Unfortunately, the magnitude of this story is actually distorted by today’s controlled mainstream media; but keep in mind, at any other time in American history this may be the top story in the nation or top story of the year.

But in a nation deeply tangled in a cesspool of lies, deceit and propaganda, many Obama supporters see this headline and think nothing of it.


10. CIA/CNN puts out major ISIS psyop report, no one cares!

I covered some of this in my April 2015 report exposing a CNN report by Evan Perez who apparently delivers an entirely false and unreliable/unbelievable ISIS report.

But, more importantly, and bad news for the new world order plans, no one seems to care about the ISIS show.

Americans everywhere have finally given up on the ISIS show. They are immune to fear, and government uses ‘fear’ to push their agendas.

Without the effectiveness of fear the new world order plans are arguably in severe jeopardy.

What we are seeing now is the CIA pushing their staged reports through mainstream media (particularly CNN), each ISIS script is intended to keep ISIS going – that is, prolong the existence of ISIS.

Paradigm Shift and the Saying Goodbye to the NWO

Americans everywhere and people all around the world should be seeing the glass half full, because it is half full.

The new world order really is dying out, but it is dying out slowly. It’s dying out slowly because there are more of us than there are of them.

It’s dying out because people have had enough. It’s dying out because people are using the power of the Internet to look things up and they are confirming the truth about who we are and our political world.

They are finding out that government ONLY operates via “conspiracy”.

They are realising that conspiracy is the norm not some special category which needs special consideration. This global realisation is part of the paradigm shift we are all experiencing.

This global paradigm shift does not, however, prevent the control system from continuing their attempt to march toward a new world order of global tyranny.

Nothing will stop this control system except the expiration date they are all on now. Everything that they are doing will expire at some point.

Soldiers who are part of the system will all have to make a moral decision to either follow illegal orders or to follow their conscience.

There are too many factors contributing to the slow death of the new world order to mention here.

Their death is real and we should keep focused on this slow process in order to remind ourselves to keep fighting the good fight and that everything we do to make others more aware is paying off.

Here’s to a dying system.


Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi

Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi

Countries And International Groups That Have Switched From US Dollar To National Currencies In Trade
May 8 2015 | From: GeoPolitics

In early 2014, Justin Yifu Lin, the former World Bank Chief Economist, blamed the dominance of the US dollar for global economic crises and said it should be eliminated as the world’s reserve currency.



Click here to open a larger version of this image in a new window


According to Lin, the solution would be to replace the national currency with a global currency.

In the recent months, several countries, including Russia, China, India and Turkey, have decided to ditch the US dollar in their foreign trade, often paying for products in gold or other agreed on currencies.

One of the significant sources of funds for the Nazionist Khazarian Mafia is the healthcare industry which registered a whopping $3.09 trillion in 2014, and is projected to soar to $3.57 trillion in 2017, in the US alone. We believe that this is just a conservative figure.

We can avoid using drugs, defeat any viral attack and scaremongering easily by knowing how to build our own comprehensive antiviral system. Find more about it here.


Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi

Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi

A Totalitarian Society Has Totalitarian Science
May 7 2015 | From: JonRappoport

And vice versa. Totalitarian science lets you know you’re living in a totalitarian society



The totalitarian party principles from George Orwell's "1984"


The government, the press, the mega-corporations, the prestigious foundations, the academic institutions, the “humanitarian” organizations say:


"This is the disease. This is its name. This is what causes it. This is the drug that treats it. This is the vaccine that prevents it."

“This is how accurate diagnosis is done. These are the tests. These are the possible results and what they mean."

“Here are the genes. This is what they do. This is how they can be changed and substituted and manipulated. These are the outcomes."

“These are the data and the statistics. They are correct. There can be no argument about them.

“This is life. These are the components of life. All change and improvement result from our management of the components."

“This is the path. It is governed by truth which science reveals. Walk the path. We will inform you when you stray. We will report new improvements."

“This is the end. You can go no farther. You must give up the ghost. We will remember you.”

We are now witnessing the acceleration of Official Science. Of course, that term is an internal contradiction. But the State shrugs and moves forward.

The notion that the State can put its seal on favored science, enforce it, and punish its competitors, is anathema to a free society.

For example: declaring that psychiatrists can appear in court as expert witnesses, when none of the so-called mental disorders listed in the psychiatric literature are diagnosed by laboratory tests.

For example: stating that vaccination is mandatory, in order to protect the vaccinated (who are supposed to be immune) from the unvaccinated. An absurdity on its face.

For example: announcing that the science of climate change is “settled,” when there are, in fact, huge numbers of researchers who disagree. And then, drafting legislation and issuing executive orders based on the decidedly unsettled science.

For example: officially approving the release and sale of medical drugs (“safe and effective”) which go on to kill, at a conservative estimate, 100,000 Americans every year. And then refusing to investigate or punish the purveyors of these drug approvals (the FDA).

For example: permitting the widespread use of genetically modified food crops, based on no long-term studies of their impact on human health. And then, arbitrarily announcing that the herbicide, Roundup, for which many of these crops are specifically designed, is non-toxic.

For example: declaring and promoting the existence of various epidemics, when the viruses purportedly causing them are not proven to exist and/or not proven to cause human illness (Ebola, SARS, West Nile, Swine Flu, etc.)


A few of you reading this have been with me since 1988, when I published my first book, AIDS INC., Scandal of the Century. Among other conclusions, I pointed out that HIV had never been shown to cause human illness; the front-line drug given to AIDS patients, AZT, was overwhelmingly toxic; and what was being called AIDS was actually a diverse number immune-suppressing conditions.

Others of you have found my work more recently, since I started this site in 2001. I always return to the subject of false science, because it is the most powerful long-term instrument for repression, political control, and destruction of human life.

As I’ve stated on many occasions, medical science is ideal for mounting and launching covert ops aimed at populations - because it appears to be politically neutral, without any allegiance to State interests.

Unfortunately, medical science, on many fronts, has been hijacked and taken over. The profit motive is one objective, but beyond that, there is a more embracing goal:

Totalitarian control.

It aims to replace your freedom, consciousness, and intelligence with its own synthetic versions.


Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi

Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi

Catherine Austin Fitts In Auckland, May 23rd: The Global Rebalancing
May 7 2015 | From: Solari

Catherine Austin Fitts will be speaking at the University of Auckland Business School, Auckland, New Zealand on Saturday May 23rd from 4 pm to 6 pm. Catherine is well aware of what is going on in the cabal-run world and is a specialist within such areas as finance, the impact of the NWO agenda also and the secret space program.



The global economy is rebalancing. The process is accelerating and this affects everyone.

Within the G-20 countries, economic production now ranges from approximately $6,000 per person in India to $70,000 per person in the United States. Global rebalancing means one day the two will be the same.

Because huge imbalances remain, massive change is coming. Global economic parity may be a long way away, but the process of moving towards it is unstoppable.

Sometimes organic, sometimes terrifying, its course is full of surprises. The rebalancing process is putting extreme pressures on the global monetary and financial system. As it unravels, the big question is: what will take its place?

This raises profound issues about the integrity of the currencies and financial markets on which we all depend. Want to understand what is unravelling and how it affects you and your community?

Please come and listen to Catherine, who will frame the key issues before us and how they already impact on our own responsibilities at home, in business and as citizens.





Who Is Catherine Austin Fitts?

Catherine is the president of Solari, Inc., publisher of The Solari Report, and managing member of Solari Investment Advisory Services, LLC, based in the US.

Catherine served as managing director and member of the board of directors of a Wall Street investment bank and as Assistant Secretary of Housing and Federal Housing Commissioner at the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development in the first Bush Administration.

Catherine offers a unique perspective on how to navigate the opportunities and risks in the global financial system and political economy.

The Solari Report’s mission is to help people build wealth in ways that build real wealth in the wider economy.

She believes that personal and family wealth is a critical ingredient of both individual freedom and community health and wealth.
Catherine graduated from the University of Pennsylvania (BA), the Wharton School (MBA) and studied Mandarin Chinese at the Chinese University of Hong Kong. She lives in Tennessee, USA.

For more information on this event click here. She will also be speaking in Australia soon, the details of which are also on her website.


Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi

Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi
Why The Powers That Be Are Pushing A Cashless Society
May 6 2015 | From: ZeroHedge

We can't reign-in the banks if we cannot pull our money out of them - awareness is required;



Click here to watch 'Evolution of a Cashless Society (1:49)

Related: The War On Cash: Australia Leads The New Age Of Economic Totalitarianism

Martin Armstrong summarizes the headway being made to ban cash, and argues that the goal of those pushing a cashless society is to prevent bank runs ... and increase their control:


"The central banks are ... planning drastic restrictions on cash itself. They see moving to electronic money will first eliminate the underground economy, but secondly, they believe it will even prevent a banking crisis.

This idea of eliminating cash was first floated as the normal trial balloon to see how the people take it. It was first launched by Kenneth Rogoff of Harvard University and Willem Buiter, the chief economist at Citigroup. Their claims have been widely hailed and their papers are now the foundation for the new age of Economic Totalitarianism that confronts us.

Rogoff and Buiter have laid the ground work for the end of much of our freedom and will one day will be considered the new Marx with hindsight. They sit in their lofty offices but do not have real world practical experience beyond theory.

Considerations of their arguments have shown how governments can seize all economic power are destroy cash in the process eliminating all rights. Physical paper money provides the check against negative interest rates for if they become too great, people will simply withdraw their funds and hoard cash.

Furthermore, paper currency allows for bank runs. Eliminate paper currency and what you end up with is the elimination of the ability to demand to withdraw funds from a bank.

***

In many nations, specific measures have already been taken demonstrating that the Rogoff-Buiter world of Economic Totalitarianism is indeed upon us. This is the death of Capitalism.

Of course the socialists hate Capitalism and see other people’s money should be theirs. What they cannot see is that Capitalism is freedom from government totalitarianism. The freedom to pursue the field you desire without filling the state needs that supersede your own.

There have been test runs of this Rogoff-Buiter Economic Totalitarianism to see if the idea works. I reported on June 21, 2014 that Britain was doing a test run. A shopping street in Manchester banned cash as part of an experiment to see if Brits would accept a cashless society.

London buses ended accepting cash payments from July 2014. Meanwhile, Currency Exchange dealers began offering debt cards instead of cash that they market as being safer to travel with. The Chorlton, South Manchester experiment was touted to test customers and business reaction to the idea for physical currency will disappear inside 20 years.

France passed another Draconian new law that from the police parissummer of 2015 it will now impose cash requirements dramatically trying to eliminate cash by force. French citizens and tourists will then only be allowed a limited amount of physical money.

They have financial police searching people on trains just passing through France to see if they are transporting cash, which they will now seize. Meanwhile, the new French Elite are moving in this very same direction. Piketty wants to just take everyone’s money who has more than he does. Nobody stands on the side of freedom or on restraining the corruption within government.

The problem always turns against the people for we are the cause of the fiscal mismanagement of government that never has enough for themselves.

In Greece a drastic reduction in cash is also being discussed in light of the economic crisis. Now any bill over €70 should be payable only by check or credit card – it will be illegal to pay in cash. The German Baader Bank founded in Munich expects formally to abolish the cash to enforce negative interest rates on accounts that is really taxation on whatever money you still have left after taxes.

***

Complete abolition of cash threatens our very freedom and rights of citizens in so many areas.

***

Paper currency is indeed the check against negative interest rates. We need only look to Switzerland to prove that theory. Any attempt to impose say a 5% negative interest rates (tax) would lead to an unimaginably massive flight into cash.

This was already demonstrated recently by the example of Swiss pension funds, which withdrew their money from the bank in a big way and now store it in vaults in cash in order to escape the financial repression. People will act in their own self-interest and negative interest rates are likely to reduce the sales of government bonds and set off a bank run as long as paper money exists.

Obviously, government and bankers are not stupid. The only way to prevent such a global bank run would be the total prohibition of paper money. This is unlikely, both in Switzerland and in the United States because the economies are dominated there by a certain “liberalism” to some extent but also because their currencies also circulate outside their domestic economies.

The fact that but the question of the cash ban in the context of a global conference with the participation of the major central banks of the US and the ECB will be discussed, demonstrates by itself that the problem is not a regional problem.

Nevertheless, there is a growing assumption that the negative interest rate world (tax on cash) is likely to increase dramatically in Europe in particular since it is socialism that is collapsing. Government in Brussels is unlikely to yield power and their line of thinking cannot lead to any solution.

The negative interest rate concept is making its way into the United States at J.P. Morgan where they will charge a fee on excess cash on deposit starting May 1st, 2015. Asset holdings of cash with a tax or a fee in the amount of the negative interest rate seems to be underway even in Switzerland.

***

The movement toward electronic money is moving at high speed and this says a lot about the state of the financial system. The track record of the major financial institutions is nearly perfect – they are always caught on the wrong side when a crisis breaks, which requires their bailouts.

The fact that we have already seen test runs with theory-balloons flying, the major financial institutions are in no shape to withstand another economic decline.

For depositors, this means they really need to grasp what is going on here for unless they are vigilant, there is a serious risk of losing everything. We must understand that these measures will be implemented overnight in the middle of a banking crisis after 2015.75. The balloons have taken off and the discussions are underway.

The trend in taxation and reduction of cash seems to be unstoppable. Government is not prepared to reform for that would require a new way of thinking and a loss of power. That is not a consideration. They only see one direction and that is to take us into the new promised-land of economic totalitarianism."

People can’t pull cash out of their bank accounts – for political reasons, because they’ve lost confidence in the bank, or because “bail-ins” are enacted – if cash is banned.

The Financial Times argued last year that central banks would be the real winners from a cashless society:


"Central bankers, after all, have had an explicit interest in introducing e-money from the moment the global financial crisis began…

***

The introduction of a cashless society empowers central banks greatly. A cashless society, after all, not only makes things like negative interest rates possible, it transfers absolute control of the money supply to the central bank, mostly by turning it into a universal banker that competes directly with private banks for public deposits. All digital deposits become base money."


The Government Can Manipulate Digital Accounts More Easily than Cash

Moreover, an official White House panel on spying has implied that the government is manipulating the amount in people’s financial accounts.

If all money becomes digital, it would be much easier for the government to manipulate our accounts.

Indeed, numerous high-level NSA whistleblowers say that NSA spying is about crushing dissent and blackmailing opponentsnot stopping terrorism.

This may sound over-the-top … but remember, the government sometimes labels its critics as “terrorists“. If the government claims the power to indefinitely detain – or even assassinate – citizens at the whim of the executive, don’t you think that government people would be willing to shut down, or withdraw a stiff “penalty” from a dissenter’s bank account?

If society becomes cashless, dissenters can’t hide cash. All of their financial holdings would be vulnerable to an attack by the government.

This would be the ultimate form of control. Because – without access to money – people couldn’t resist, couldn’t hide and couldn’t escape.

And see this:




Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi

Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi

Secret TPPA Chapter On Investment Leaked
May 6 2015 | From: GeoPolitics

WikiLeaks has released the “Investment Chapter” from the secret negotiations of the TPP (Trans-Pacific Partnership) agreement. The document adds to the previous WikiLeaks publications of the chapters for Intellectual Property Rights (November 2013) and the Environment (January 2014).



The TPP Investment Chapter, published today, is dated 20 January 2015. The document is classified and supposed to be kept secret for four years after the entry into force of the TPP agreement or, if no agreement is reached, for four years from the close of the negotiations.

Julian Assange, WikiLeaks editor said:


"The TPP has developed in secret an unaccountable supranational court for multinationals to sue states. This system is a challenge to parliamentary and judicial sovereignty. Similar tribunals have already been shown to chill the adoption of sane environmental protection, public health and public transport policies.”

Current TPP negotiation member states are the United States, Japan, Mexico, Canada, Australia, Malaysia, Chile, Singapore, Peru, Vietnam, New Zealand and Brunei.

The TPP is the largest economic treaty in history, including countries that represent more than 40 per cent of the world´s GDP.

The Investment Chapter highlights the intent of the TPP negotiating parties, led by the United States, to increase the power of global corporations by creating a supra-national court, or tribunal, where foreign firms can “sue” states and obtain taxpayer compensation for “expected future profits”.

These investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) tribunals are designed to overrule the national court systems. ISDS tribunals introduce a mechanism by which multinational corporations can force governments to pay compensation if the tribunal states that a country’s laws or policies affect the company’s claimed future profits.

In return, states hope that multinationals will invest more. Similar mechanisms have already been used. For example, US tobacco company Phillip Morris used one such tribunal to sue Australia (June 2011 – ongoing) for mandating plain packaging of tobacco products on public health grounds; and by the oil giant Chevron against Ecuador in an attempt to evade a multi-billion-dollar compensation ruling for polluting the environment.





The Philip Morris companies' cigarette brands include Pall Mall and Marlboro

The threat of future lawsuits chilled environmental and other legislation in Canada after it was sued by pesticide companies in 2008/9. ISDS tribunals are often held in secret, have no appeal mechanism, do not subordinate themselves to human rights laws or the public interest, and have few means by which other affected parties can make representations.

The TPP negotiations have been ongoing in secrecy for five years and are now in their final stages. In the United States the Obama administration plans to “fast-track” the treaty through Congress without the ability of elected officials to discuss or vote on individual measures.

This has met growing opposition as a result of increased public scrutiny following WikiLeaks’ earlier releases of documents from the negotiations.

The TPP is set to be the forerunner to an equally secret agreement between the US and EU, the TTIP (Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership).

Negotiations for the TTIP were initiated by the Obama administration in January 2013. Combined, the TPP and TTIP will cover more than 60 per cent of global GDP.

The third treaty of the same kind, also negotiated in secrecy is TISA, on trade in services, including the financial and health sectors. It covers 50 countries, including the US and all EU countries. WikiLeaks released the secret draft text of the TISA’s financial annex in June 2014.

All these agreements on so-called “free trade” are negotiated outside the World Trade Organization’s (WTO) framework. Conspicuously absent from the countries involved in these agreements are the BRICs countries of Brazil, Russia, India and China.

Read the Secret Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPP) – Investment chapter

One of the significant sources of funds for the Nazionist Khazarian Mafia is the healthcare industry which registered a whopping $3.09 trillion in 2014, and is projected to soar to $3.57 trillion in 2017, in the US alone. We believe that this is just a conservative figure.

We can avoid using drugs, defeat any viral attack and scaremongering easily by knowing how to build our own comprehensive antiviral system. Find more about it here.


Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi

Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. On Vaccines: Big Pharma Has Captured The Scientific, Regulatory, Law-Making Processes
May 3 2015 | From: GlobalResearch / NaturalNews

In this address given on the California Capitol steps in Sacramento Robert Kennedy Jr. provides an inspired and detailed analysis of the extent to which the powerful pharmaceutical cartel has effectively captured the nation’s scientific, regulatory, and law-making processes.

Related: Australia wants to make vaccines mandatory: Historical Negligence:

Flu vaccination ban goes national after fever, convulsions in children




Combined with the corporate news media’s dependence on drug advertising, this has put big pharma in a position where it is running roughshod over informed choice and dictating vaccine policies that have little-if-any basis in scientific research yet will greatly contribute to that industry’s already gargantuan profits.

This is Robert F. Kennedy Jr’s speech at the SB277 rally that took place in Sacramento, California at the State Capitol on April 8, 2015.




Kennedy offers an example of scientist and pediatrician Paul Offit, the developer of the rotavirus vaccine, whose personal stake in vaccine’s development and adoption is emblematic of the monied practices tending to corrupt vaccine science in America today. “In 1999 he sat on the [CDC] committee that added the rotavirus vaccine to the schedule.” Kennedy notes,


"At the time he was working on his own rotavirus vaccine. Opening that gateway, by adding that vaccine to the schedule, made his patent extremely valuable. Six years later he sold that patent for $182 million and pocketed about $40 million for himself. So, that kind of financial entanglement by the people to hare deciding what vaccines to add to the schedule makes it difficult, I think, for all of us to think that they only thing they’re thinking of is our children’s health."

He concluded his remarks by emphasizing that legislation such as California’s SB277 takes away the last barrier between the pharmaceutical companies’ bottom line mentality and children’s health–parental discretion itself.


"All of the barriers that are meant to protect our children–the government, the lawyers, the regulatory agencies, and the press, the checks and balances in our democratic system that are supposed to stand between corporate power and our little children–have been removed, and there’s only one barrier left, and that’s the parents, and we need to keep that in the equation."

Robert Kennedy, Jr. Is Right About Vaccines:
A Medically Induced 'Holocaust' Is Now Upon Us




At a recent screening of the powerful new documentary film Trace Amounts, which exposes the scientific connection between mercury in vaccines and autism, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. warned an audience of supportive viewers that vaccines are essentially poison vials causing a "holocaust" in our country.

The nephew of former U.S. president John F. Kennedy, RFK Jr. attended the screening in solidarity with California parents who are fighting to stop Senate Bill 277 from eliminating their freedom as Californians to exempt their children from "mandatory" vaccinations. Speaking to the crowd, Kennedy emphasized the proven dangers of vaccines.

"They can put anything they want in that vaccine and they have no accountability for it," stated Kennedy about the vaccine industry, which ironically maintains its own exclusive and unconstitutional exemption from legal liability for vaccines that injure and kill children.


Trace Amounts helped kill anti-freedom vaccine exemption elimination bill in Oregon Both entering and leaving the stage to exuberant standing ovations, Kennedy lauded Trace Amounts for helping persuade lawmakers in Oregon to scrap a bill similar to California's SB 277 that would have eliminated personal vaccine exemptions in the Beaver State.

He also empathized with parents of vaccine-injured children, who often have no support from the legal system, and sometimes even from their friends and family members, in addressing the damage caused by vaccine quackery.

"They get the shot, that night they have a fever of a hundred and three, they go to sleep, and three months later their brain is gone," lamented Kennedy about how vaccine injuries progress. "This is a holocaust, what this is doing to our country."


Not a single invited politician shows up to Trace Amounts screening

California lawmakers were reportedly also invited to the Trace Amounts screening where Kennedy spoke, with three rows specially cordoned off for their convenient viewing. But according to The Sacramento Bee, not a single lawmaker showed up except for a handful of random staffers. No bother, though, as the film was still shown, and the crowd invigorated to take a unified stand for medical freedom.

89.3 KPCC is now reporting that the proposed legislation SB 277 would unconstitutionally deprive unvaccinated children from receiving an adequate education by preventing them from attending public school. Its supporters, however, are planning to reintroduce it once again in the coming days.



Vaccines are a scam, and the government's revolving door with the vaccine industry proves it has no business trying to pass anti-exemption laws

As far as the idea of eliminating vaccine exemptions, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to realize that those trying to push anti-exemption legislation work for or are being paid off by the vaccine industry.

"The former head of the CDC, Julie Gerberding, is now the head of the Merck Vaccine Division," wrote one commenter at The Sacramento Bee concerning this issue. "The government is having a dirty little affair with the drug industry."

"They share ownership of patents. They created the unconstitutional 'Vaccine Court' that usurps our 7th Amendment and shields drug manufacturers from liability. The phony court has no judge, no jury and no justice for most people. They cherry pick cases to keep liability down and lie about the real number of vaccine injuries, yet they have still paid out about 3 billion dollars for the injuries they will admit to."

Check out this vaccine debate that aired on PBS Hawaii, in which the show's producers and hosts failed to mention its sponsorship from Merck, Pfizer and various other vaccine manufacturers:
WaronWeThePeople.com.



Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi

Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi

The Climate Change Industry And The Hoax Of Global Warming
May 2 2015 | From: FreedomOutpost

If you ask the environmentalists, it is global warming. If it snows, it is global warming. If it's hot, it is global warming. Everything is global warming and must be redressed immediately or the earth will perish.



This is not just Amerika - but worldwide. Hundreds of billions have already been spent around the globe on a deliberately manufactured panic.

I am not sure who coined the term "climate change industry," but it is an apt description of the snake oil salesmen who have become billionaires on the unfounded and irrational fear of debunked global warming and of climate change based on manufactured consensus science.

The climate has been changing for millennia in cyclical periods dominated by either unusually cold or unusually hot temperatures.

It is convenient to the promoters of the climate change industry to purposefully confound weather events with climate.

Having declared that the "science is settled," the global warming scaremongering environmentalists are moving on to the next target of limiting our property rights and freedoms via carbon footprint and draconian, coal-industry destructive EPA regulations.

After all, the number one threat to national security has been declared to be climate change.

It is not the crushing, out-of-control debt; it is not the planned and unchecked flood of immigrants into countries around the world, changing the demographics and eliminating sovereignty to the benefit of global elitist control; it is not ISIS beheading Christians and occupying the formerly liberated towns and provinces in Iraq; and it is not Iran, with its nuclear bomb program, threatening to wipe Israel off the map - Israel, our ally, and the only sane patch of reality in the Middle East.

The climate change industry has admitted through a Freudian slip that their agenda of climate change is "disrupting national economies, costing us dearly today and even more tomorrow."

Of course, climate has been changing, and we are in a cooling period now, but truth cannot impede the liberal political advocates' agenda of taxing rich countries more, spreading the wealth, and destroying our economy in the name of protecting the Earth.



The climate change industry has managed to transform a natural phenomenon of climate change into a global disaster that needs to be addressed by bureaucrats through fundamentally changing how we live, what we own, how our economies are run, by carbon footprint taxation, Smart Growth, Green Growth state and local programs around the world, and through weather modification spraying of chemicals into the atmosphere.

This spraying of chemicals (chemtrails) is really affecting the weather and the growing season for agriculture, reducing yield. The climate change industry has become such a religion of environmentalism gone berserk that they are now trying to ban farming.

Electricity costs are going up, smart meters that catch on fire have been installed everywhere in order to control people's energy consumption and in-home ambient temperature, and many electricity generation plants are scheduled to be closed due to draconian EPA regulations.

The government's all-out assault to redress climate change through regulatory planning and financial control is having a serious impact on our economy, the coal industry, the oil industry, and on everybody's lives.

The hypothesis that rich nations caused climate change by burning fossil fuels to produce energy has never been proven by IPCC's computer modeling.

The fact that now the hypothesis changed its name from global warming to climate change in the face of obvious 18 years of global cooling is enough evidence that the purveyors of the industry of climate change are desperate but are not giving up.

There is never a shortage of young, idealistic rioters-for-hire who, for a nominal fee will demonstrate anywhere against global warming, even in Quebec in the snow. Fleecing rich countries with carbon taxes is too lucrative a scam to give up the agenda.

The real reason behind the global warming scare and why the United Nations' alarmists have been driving us into forced submission of environmentalist stewardship is that they want capitalism destroyed and replaced with their vision of a utopian communist economy that has never worked across the centuries.

These progressives have a problem with the Industrial Revolution, with "fossil fuels" (They are not so fossil, since the earth keeps producing them), with the only successful economic model that has provided generous income to all these hot-air spewing, idle bureaucrats, who have nothing better to do than meet in exotic locales planning the destruction of the goose that lays the golden eggs that feed their exorbitant lifestyles, salaries, bonuses, and pensions.

Christina Figueres, Executive Secretary of U.N.'s Convention on Climate Change, disclosed the real reason for the climate change industry when she told us that they are not interested in saving the world from global warming Armageddon, but they want to destroy capitalism:


"This is the first time in the history of mankind that we are setting ourselves the task of intentionally, within a period of time, to change the economic development model that has been reigning for at least 150 years, since the Industrial Revolution."


Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi

Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi

74 Medical And NASA Scientists Have Been Killed In The Last Two Years;
What's Going On?
April 30 2015 | From: NeonNettle

There have been an unusually high number of scientists' deaths in recent years. NASA Scientist Alberto Behar died in a plane crash [below] in January 2015 in Los Angeles - making a total of 74 Scientists dead in 2 years.



Alberto Behar had helped to prove that there had once been water on Mars, having worked on two missions to Mars. He was also a robotics expert who researched how robots function in harsh environments (such as under water or inside volcanoes).

The unusually high number of scientist deaths in recent years has made people question whether this death was suspicious or not.

Behar was an expert pilot; he was a flight instructor for both planes and helicopters – the weather conditions were clear and for some reason his plane just started to lose altitude. The Van Nuys Airport pilot Kashif Khursheed said “I can’t see what would be the cause of something like this. He was very knowledgeable, competent and thorough.”

This is just one of the most recent cases of a prominent scientists suspicious death, over the past two years 74 leading medical and NASA scientists have died, almost all are officially labelled suicide or an accident. 

Glenn Thomas
 was a World Health Organisation spokesperson
; he was reportedly an expert on Ebola and AIDS, he was aboard MH17 when it was shot down with approximately 100 other researchers.

Joep Lange, a leading AIDS researcher and former president of the International AIDS Society (IAS) was also aboard MH17. They were all on their way to an international AIDS conference. With one fell swoop a large portion of the leading AIDS experts were killed before they could attend a global conference.

Melissa Ketunuti, 35, was a paediatrician who specialised in cancer; she also worked on an AIDS fellowship in BotswanaShe was hogtied and set on fire in the basement of her home in PhiladelphiaDr Anne Szarewski, 53, was a cervical cancer expert; she pioneered the cervical cancer vaccine.

Ketunuti was found dead in her London home in December 2013. Her husband spent hours drilling through the front door that she had locked from the inside, when he found her she was dead, to this day no one knows what killed her.

An inquiry into her death was launched but nothing conclusive was ever found.Perhaps one of the most controversial scientist deaths in the last few years was that of Shane Truman Todd, 31. In June 2012 he was found dead, his body was in morgue in Singapore, he was an electrical engineer.

He was working on a top-secret “one of a kind” machine for the Chinese that was believed to be a defence weapon. Shane told his family that he was not happy with what he was doing and he feared for his life, he was allegedly being asked to compromise U.S security.

He quit his job and was due to leave China and fly home but died a week before his flight after his last day at work building this unknown machine. Foul play was suspected and his family began campaigning for the truth, Chinese official said they would look into the matter and try and determine if it was murder or suicide but as of yet there are no answers. 

These are just a tiny fraction of the scientist that have died under suspicious circumstances, you can read about mysterious scientist deaths by clicking here. All of these people are either leading medical experts or leading engineers, you have to ask what could they have known that would have led to their deaths? Or could it all simply be coincidence?

In a time where conspiracy is commonplace it is increasingly difficult to differentiate between what could be a conspiracy and what is simply an unfortunate event. It is incredibly suspect why so many of these deaths are so odd, the people who were killed would have access to sensitive informationthat government officials may not want disclosed.




Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi

Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi

Seasoned Investigative Journalist Exposes Inside Strategies To Censor News
April 29 2015 | From: Mercola

You can choose to ignore reality, but you can't ignore the consequences of ignoring reality. Most of us rely heavily on the media for information, not realizing that 90 percent of it is controlled by a mere six media giants.



Sharyl Attkisson, a five-time Emmy Award winning investigative journalist whose television career spans more than three decades is one of my personal heroes. She was the reporter who, in 2009, blew the lid off the swine flu media hype, showing the hysteria was completely unfounded and manufactured.

She recently left CBS to pursue other avenues of investigative journalism, and has authored a highly praised book, Stonewalled: My Fight for Truth Against the Forces of Obstruction, Intimidation, and Harassment in Obama's Washington, which exposes what goes on behind the scenes in the media that gives you the information you come to think of as real and true.


"I left CBS about a year ago when it seemed I had met with so many dead ends in trying to continue the original investigative reporting that I've done for so many years there," Sharyl says.

"My producer and I just kept hitting brick walls in the last two years or so in trying to get this reporting on television. We certainly weren't alone. Reporters are complaining about this across the board at many print organizations and broadcast outlets...

The watchdog reporting that the government values so much is simply not desired for a variety of reasons as much as it once was at the national level. I think also this is a problem in local news...

There was no point [in staying]. I was never in a position to turn up better stories; I have more information, more sources, more whistleblowers, and more I felt might produce terrific stories than ever before after 20 years in CBS News, and yet, utterly lacked the ability to get any of it on television.

I could've stayed and done weather stories and stories of the day but that's just not where my interest was."






What Led to the Downfall of Watchdog Reporting?

Unfortunately, the trend of diluting the depth and scope of investigative journalism can even be seen in high-quality programs like CBS' 60 Minutes, which has been a favorite show of mine since its inception over four decades ago.

As noted by Sharyl, the reasons for the decline of investigative journalism are complicated. But a big part of it is due to commercial concerns; basically, commercial and corporate influences came into play, and media outlets grew to accept commercialization as part of the news process.


"I call it soft censorship," Sharyl says. "When you know you have a sponsor and you know it's important to the corporation, are you really going to offend the sponsor by going after stories that they don't like?

But I do think it's more overt than that sometimes. The sponsors explicitly complain and argue at the corporate level that certain stories and topics shouldn't be done.

We know this is true based on one anecdote I put in the book, but there are other anecdotes and experiences that reporters have had, where they've been told that this is the case.

Additionally, there are political factors. There were managers at CBS in those last two years that inserted their ideology into the reporting of producers and reporters, who by and large were very fair. That can change the whole tone of the reporting."

One of the examples in Sharyl's book that really hit home for me was when Hillary Clinton ran against Obama for president, and while on the campaign trail told reporters she had dodged sniper fire on a trip as First Lady, 12 years prior, when she visited Bosnia.

It seems like a silly thing to lie about, but lie she did. Sharyl and other journalists had been on that trip, and they all knew no one had dodged sniper fire, least of all the First Lady. Fortunately, Sharyl had archived videos of the event to prove it.


"It couldn't be farther from the truth, the idea that we had been shot up by sniper fire," Sharyl says.

"There are a couple of choices – just being untruthful for her own benefit, or was she delusional, which is a little frightening. But I think the public got past that because they accepted her as the Secretary of State."

Another point Sharyl makes very effectively in her book is that there's this collaboration within the media, such that if one agency picks up a story, they all run the same story. You can watch the nightly news on every channel, and the story will be presented in virtually the same way, sometimes more or less verbatim.


"Too often, I think they don't want to cover a major controversy unless others have already covered it, like the New York Times or the Washington Post; then it's safe.

They don't want to cover certain stories for ideological reasons. They don't want to cover certain stories against corporate partners that might harm corporate relationships."


Intimidation and Harassment of Journalists

True investigative journalists, such as Sharyl, have also become targets of intimidation and harassment. For example, at one point her computer and phone lines were hacked to find out what she was working on.


"I assume there are a handful of journalists who do that sort of critical reporting on the government, and on this administration in particular, that they wanted to watch.

They never dreamed I would luck upon the resources to have the computer examined by experts that could find the software they deposited in my computer.

This software was proprietary to a government agency, either the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), National Security Agency (NSA), Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), or Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)...

They had my keystroke data... They could look at all my files. They used Skype audio – I didn't know this was possible – but they could turn it on invisibly, without you knowing it, to listen into conversations. They could also remove files using Skype... We were able to confirm these highly sophisticated long-term, remote intrusions."

Another interesting book for anyone interested or concerned about matters such as these is Future Crimes: Everything Is Connected, Everyone Is Vulnerable, and What We Can Do About It by Marc Goodman. The book discusses in great detail how this type of hacking can occur, and more importantly, what simple measures we can do to protect ourselves. It's a reality. And if they're doing it to top-notch investigative reporters, certainly everyone is a candidate.

On Astroturfing...

"Astroturf" is the effort on the part of special interests, whether corporate or political, to surreptitiously sway public opinion and make it appear as though it's a grassroots effort for or against a particular agenda, when in reality such a groundswell of public opinion might not exist. Sharyl explains:


"They turn to things like social media – Facebook and Twitter – using pseudonyms and multiple accounts to spread things around. They use their partners who blog for them, write things, and pick up on one another's work until sometimes it's been picked up in the mainstream media as if it's a fact.

It's all intended to make you feel as though if you hold a certain opinion that they don't want you to have, you're the outlier. Everybody else agrees with 'X' except you, and that may not be the truth. This is a huge business... There are actually PR firms that specialize in these sorts of tactics.

Astroturfing is now more important, I am told by lobbyists and PR firms, to many clients than the direct lobbying of Congress because it's so effective to reach out to the public. They may have someone write a letter to the editor and you don't know that person is being paid by a special interest to advance a certain opinion.

They may start as a nonprofit without saying out front that they're behind the nonprofit. The nonprofit may then look like a charity that's advancing a certain opinion, which is actually acting on behalf of the corporate interest or the special interest. Again, it's very widespread..."

Hallmark signs of astroturfing include using key language - words such as crank, crack, nutty, pseudo, conspiracy, and other language that's effective with the public to try to make you dismiss an argument they don't like. Another hallmark of an Astroturf campaign is attacking those who are questioning authority, such as reporters who are exposing the truth, whistleblowers who dare to step forward, and people asking tough questions.

It's important to be aware of these kinds of concerted efforts to distort the truth, and to understand how they're done, because these "faux concern" campaigns can have a profound influence on your perception of reality.

Astroturfing in Action

A perfect example of astroturfing just occurred when a GMO front group attacked Dr. Oz after he reported on the now scientifically established hazards of glyphosate, and the media swallowed and regurgitated the propaganda without any critical thought whatsoever. Slate magazine publicized the attack with the headline “Letter from Prominent Doctors Implies Columbia Should Fire Dr. Oz for Being a Quack.”

The letter accuses Dr. Oz of repeatedly showing “disdain for science and for evidence-based medicine, as well as baseless and relentless opposition to the genetic engineering of food crops.”

The letter was signed by Dr. Henry I. Miller and nine other “distinguished physicians.” What the media has failed to address is that Dr. Henry Miller is hardly a concerned physician. He’s actually a now well-known shill for the GMO industry.

In his capacity as its front man, he was caught misrepresenting himself during the Anti-Prop.37 campaign in 2012, pretending to be a Stanford professor opposing GMO labeling, when in fact he is not a professor at Stanford. The TV ad had to be pulled off the air because of this misrepresentation.

Aside from that, he has a long and sordid history1 of defending toxic chemicals such as DDT, in addition to defending Big Tobacco. Some of the other nine physicians are also less than distinguished. As noted by US Right to Know:


“One was stripped of his medical license in New York and sent to federal prison camp for Medicaid fraud. Yet Dr. Gilbert Ross plays up his M.D. credentials in his role as acting president of the American Council for Science and Health (ACSH). Ross was joined on the Columbia letter by ACSH board member Dr. Jack Fisher.

So what is ACSH? Though some reporters treat it as an independent science source, the group has been heavily funded by oil, chemical, and tobacco companies, and has a long history of making inaccurate statements about science that directly benefit those industries – for example claiming that secondhand smoke isn’t linked to heart attacks, fracking doesn’t pollute water...

These facts are relevant in stories about scientific integrity. The scientific accuracy and motivations of the accusers matter when they are publicly challenging the scientific accuracy and motivations of somebody they are trying to get fired. We urge reporters and editors to take a closer look at the sources selling them story ideas, and to act as better watchdogs for the public interest”.


Dr. Henry Miller and American Council for Science and Health Are False Fronts for the GMO Industry

Indeed, Henry Miller and ACSH are false fronts for the GMO industry, plain and simple. They are part of a PR hack strategy of astroturfing, and the mainstream media are too inept to look behind the curtain to see what’s really there.

The fact of the matter is that this attack on Dr. Oz is orchestrated not by concerned physicians or scientists but rather by industry shills whose job it is to attack anyone who embraces a more natural approach to health and/or raise damning questions that might hurt the industry’s bottom-line.

 


Why Conventional Media So Rarely Tells You the Truth About Health

One industry that wields a great deal of power within the media today is the pharmaceutical industry. It's rare to sit through an evening of television without viewing several drug ads. They also advertise heavily in print and online media.

The advertising dollars they spend not only generates sales, it also gives them the power to influence what's being reported in the news. Here's just one example:


"There's a story in my book about former executive producer of mine who got a phone call from the sales division, which was very inappropriate.

He said the sales person from CBS was kind of screaming at him because we'd been doing a lot of stories looking at side effects and problems with the very popular and billion-dollar-selling cholesterol-lowering drugs, statins.

The advertisers didn't like that. Therefore, someone from the CBS corporate apparently didn't like that, and called down and said something like, 'If you keep doing these stories, it's going to be really, really bad for CBS...'

I think that happens more often than we know explicitly. But this time, it was followed by what I see as all of the media backing down on pharmaceutical-related stories.

We were doing very aggressive coverage of problems within the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) – not just me, but all the networks and a lot of print publications – about vaccines side effects, and about other medical issues. That all has virtually stopped.

You can almost point to a time period when it seems someone made a phone call and said, 'That's it fellas. There are advertisers.'

And you won't see these stories now even when there's a multi-billion-dollar criminal settlement against drug companies for mismarketing drugs that are commonly used. That's a huge story that should be leading the news in my opinion.

But most people probably never heard of it because those are things that offend the sensibilities of advertisers, who now control to some degree the editorial content of networks, publications, and print publications that are advertising.

And, as you know, they have several lobbyists for every member of Congress on Capitol Hill so they can make sure certain hearings don't happen. As recently as last year, they were able to stop a planned vaccine-related hearing. The control is almost total in my view. That's just one example of a corporate influence."



What Are Some 'Big' Stories Not Being Reported Right Now?

According to Sharyl, if journalists would simply cover the news with facts and fairness, topics like vaccine side effects would receive far greater coverage. The reason it doesn't is because that topic has been deemed "untouchable." Other emerging health issues that you don't hear about in the news include the emergence of enterovirus EV-D68. It's a polio-like virus, but it's not polio.

Thousands of people were stricken with it last year, and the virus appears to be linked to cases of paralysis. At least a dozen children also died from it, yet you didn't hear about this on the news because it was not, unlike the measles vaccine, something the government was interested in promoting.


"Too often reporters wait for the government to tell them what's a story and what's not a story. They won't do the digging on their own, which I think is a very bad trend.

But I tried to find out about this [enterovirus] and asked the CDC some questions, to which they replied they didn't gather certain data.

I searched the web and found that the CDC had published a paper with the data that I've asked for! So it was completely false what they told me..."

Sharyl's book exposes many of the inside strategies that go on to suppress this type of information. Since leaving CBS News and finishing her book, she's been writing freelance, publishing a number of stories she would have had a hard time telling before, such as the story of how a government experiment on premature babies misled parents with an unethical consent form to enroll their premature babies in the program.

This study was conducted at prestigious research institutions by the government across the country. After some of the babies died, the study was stopped. Even the government's own ethics body concluded that the consent form was unethical because it didn't actually inform the parents that their babies were being entered into a study.

They were just told that this treatment would be good for their baby. In reality, the babies were randomly placed into high-oxygen or low-oxygen groups - not what was best for them individually.

The parents were unaware that their child was being given treatment based on the flip of a coin. The parents also didn't know that their child was placed in an oxygen machine that had been disabled to give false readings.


"That story was published in Daily Signal,3 which is a heritage foundation news organization that started last year. They've done some excellent reporting and haven't tampered with my stories," Sharyl says.


What the Media Isn't Telling You about 'ObamaCare'

Another story Sharyl believes has been underreported is that of HealthCare.gov. "The US government is still hiding public documents that have been under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) for a long time," she claims.

And the media simply reports whatever the government says, even though the government has been caught providing false information, including providing false statements under oath to Congress. There are still details of this health care program that we don't know anything about, and why is that?


"For millions of Americans, I think, this law is turning out to be disastrous and too expensive," she says. "There's now a new class of uninsured people who had insurance, but who've been bumped off or have gone off because they can't afford it now. The insurance isn't covering what people need.

Certainly, there are people who have benefitted, people who couldn't get insurance before. There's no doubt about that. That's going to be reported on, but what's not reported is that many people are suffering severe consequences..."

In her book she also exposes the debacle of how HealthCare.gov was developed, so if you're interested in learning more about that, please pick up a copy of Stonewalled.

Sharyl has donated proceeds from Stonewalled to the University of Florida to put on a Freedom of Information forum for students and professionals, in which they brainstormed to come up with ideas for making the government more responsive to public information request; how to fix the freedom of information process, "which is entirely pointless and useless now," as Sharyl says.

So, when you buy her book, part of the proceeds are going towards ongoing efforts to help influence a more open and honest government, which is clearly something that needs work.


Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi

Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi

The Medical Cartel: Too Big To Fail, Too Evil To Expose
April 28 2015 | From: JonRappoport

There are several reasons why the medical cartel is too big to fail: the enormous amount of money at stake; its aim to control populations.



In this article, I want to examine a related reason. Suppose it was discovered that thousands of bridges around the US were in imminent danger of collapsing? Not because maintenance and repair were lacking, not because the materials used to build them were cheap and shoddy. But because the original designs were inadequate and broke basic rules of engineering.

Suppose five or six major manufacturers built their automobiles so the vast majority of power derived from the engines was transferred to one wheel? Suppose the US Dept. of Agriculture recommended that all farmers spray their crops with heavy chlorine instead of water?

In other words, the science itself is fraudulent.

This revelation, above all, is what the medical cartel tries to guard against. Their profession has shoved in all its chips on the propaganda proposition that it does impeccable science.

Science sells. The appearance of it sells. It’s the foundation stone of many industries.

Were that stone to crack and shatter, all bets would be off. A titanic fraud would come to light. The kind of fraud that would both freeze people’s minds and blow them away.

Science is the most powerful rationalization in the modern world. Consensus reality would fail and disperse without it.

As I’ve covered before, the most conservative mainstream estimate of medically caused death in America is 225,000 people per year.

Every credential behind that figure is immaculate.

The author of the paper that presented the statistics was the late Dr. Barbara Starfield, a revered public health expert who worked for many years at the Johns Hopkins School of Public Health.

Her review, “Is US health the best in the world?”, was published on July 26th, 2000, in the Journal of the American Medical Association.

Starfield’s breakdown was as follows: the medical system kills 119,000 people a year in the US as a result of maltreatment in hospitals. The other 106,000 people are killed by FDA-approved medicines.

The FDA must approve every drug as safe and effective before it is released for public use.

It’s the medicines I want to focus on in this article. 106,000 deaths a year translates to an astonishing 1,060,000 deaths per decade.

How are these drugs approved?

Clinical trials are conducted. Reports of those trials are written. The reports, the studies, are published in peer-reviewed medical journals. The studies ARE the science.

If a million people per decade are being killed by the drugs, then a huge number of published studies proclaiming the drugs are safe are sheer fraud. There is no other way to put it.

This statement from Marcia Angell, former editor of the New England Journal of Medicine, echoes the fact:


“It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of The New England Journal of Medicine.”

(Marcia Angell, MD, The New York Review of Books, January 15, 2009, “Drug Companies & Doctors: A Story of Corruption”)

The medical cartel rests on cataclysmic fraud, scientific fraud.

Imagine what would happen if just one major media outlet decided to take on this story and push it for all it’s worth. Not merely an article or two - an ongoing campaign of relentless exposure.

The silence from that quarter speaks volumes about the controlled press and what it stands for.

Over the years, I’ve written much about the the FDA. I thought I’d assemble a small fraction of it in one place, to reveal what this federal agency is really all about and why it should be dismantled, amid a blizzard of prosecutions and convictions for negligent homicide and, yes, murder.

The discovery of a page, on the FDA’s own website, proves the FDA is fully aware that the drugs it certifies as safe have been killing Americans, at the rate of 100,000 per year.

The FDA website page is available under the heading, “Why Learn About Adverse Drug Reactions.” You can search for it using the Startpage.com search engine.

The FDA takes no blame, no responsibility for its own actions, and yet it admits the death statistics are accurate.

Understand this very clearly. No medical drug in America can be released for public use until and unless the FDA states it is safe. The FDA is the agency that makes every such decision on every drug. The buck stops there.

Yes, the FDA has a “special relationship” with the pharmaceutical industry. Yes, the FDA utilizes doctors on their drug-approval panels that have ties to the pharmaceutical industry. But, in the end, it is the FDA official seal that opens the gate and permits a drug to be prescribed by doctors and sold in the US.

In all my research on this medical-drug holocaust, I have never found a case in which any FDA employee was censured, fired, or criminally prosecuted for the killing effects of these drugs.

That is a track record Organized Crime would be proud of, and the comparison is not frivolous.

On this FDA website page, the FDA also readily admits that medical drugs are the fourth leading cause of death in America, ahead of pulmonary disease, diabetes, AIDS, pneumonia, accidents, and automobile fatalities.





The FDA website page also states there are 2 million serious adverse reactions (ADRs) from the ingestion of medical drugs, annually, in the US. That would be 20 million ADRs per decade.

When the FDA says “serious,” they aren’t talking about headaches or slight dizziness or temporary nausea. “Serious” means stroke, heart attack, neurological damage; destruction of that magnitude.

Examining these figures for death and debilitation, can you find any comparable documented crime in the American landscape? This is the kind of story that would make Watergate look like a Sunday-school picnic.

If a paper like the New York Times let loose their hounds to relentlessly explore the horror, I assure you that, in time, doctors and medical bureaucrats and even drug-company employees would come out of the woodwork with confessions, and the resultant explosions and outcries would shake the medical/pharmaceutical foundations of America and the planet.

It would shake and destroy the SCIENCE.

But these major media outlets are an intrinsic part of the Matrix that protects and sustains the crimes and the criminals. It isn’t just drug-advertising profits that keep the leading newspapers and television networks silent. It’s collusion to protect “a revered institution” - the medical system.

Read the full story at: JonRappoport


Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi

Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi

Important TPPA Update: Not Just Relevant To US - Senator Warren Challenges Obama Administration To Make Secretive Terms Of TPP Trade Agreement Public
April 27 2015 | From: Sott

Senator explains the real reason why TPP remains so secret, even as Congress begins voting on measures to ram it through, is because 'if the American people saw what was in it, they would be opposed to it.'



Visit: itsourfuture.org.nz

Prove it. Let the American voters, the press, and the global public see and read the fine print of this so-called "free trade" deal.

That's the basic message contained in a new statement released by Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) after President Obama said earlier this week that she and other opponents of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) were "wrong" when it came to their objections to the pending 12-nation agreement.


"The Administration says I'm wrong - that there's nothing to worry about," Warren wrote in a blog post addressed to constituents and the general public on Wednesday. "They say the deal is nearly done, and they are making a lot of promises about how the deal will affect workers, the environment, and human rights. Promises - but people like you can't see the actual deal."

Warren's statement came as members of the Senate Finance Committee on Wednesday evening—despite an attempt by Sen. Bernie Sanders to slam the brakes on the process - voted to pass trade promotion authority, or Fast Track, that would give President Obama and his administration the ability to negotiate the final terms of the TPP (as well as a similar deal with Europe), while relegating the congressional role to "all or nothing" up-or-down votes on the trade pacts.

Passed by a vote of 20-6, the Fast Track measure received support of seven Democrats on the committee and all but one Republican. In addition to Sen. Ron Wyden (Ore.), who co-sponsored the bill, the other Democrats who voted in favor of Fast Track were Sens. Maria Cantwell (Wash.), Ben Cardin (Md.), Bill Nelson (Fla.), Tom Carper (Del.), Mark Warner (Va.), and Michael Bennet (Colo.).

In his recent comments, Obama has called the TPP the "most progressive trade deal in history," but critics like Warren have responded by saying if that is true - if the deal is so great and wonderful - why won't the administration release the details so the public can see for themselves? Though lawmakers have received numerous briefings and can see draft versions of the agreement, they are forbidden from disclosing the details of what it contains.

So why hasn't the deal—other than through bits and pieces of un-sanctioned leaks—been made available to the general public even though corporate interests have had a seat at the table throughout the multi-year negotiating process? According to Warren, and despite assurances from Obama and others, the reason is simple: "We can't make this deal public because if the American people saw what was in it, they would be opposed to it."

She continued:


"For more than two years now, giant corporations have had an enormous amount of access to see the parts of the deal that might affect them and to give their views as negotiations progressed. But the doors stayed locked for the regular people whose jobs are on the line.

If most of the trade deal is good for the American economy, but there's a provision hidden in the fine print that could help multinational corporations ship American jobs overseas or allow for watering down of environmental or labor rules, fast track would mean that Congress couldn't write an amendment to fix it. It's all or nothing.

Before we sign on to rush through a deal like that - no amendments, no delays, no ability to block a bad bill - the American people should get to see what's in it."

Sen. Warren also appeared on The Rachel Maddow show on Wednesday night to explain her opposition. When mentioned by Maddow that the White House has now promised that there would be a "public comment period" after the TPP was approved by Congress but before President Obama signs it, Warren laughed out loud.


"They're asking [Congress] to vote now on greasing the skids," Warren said in response,

"so that we give up any chance to be able to amend it, any chance to be able to block it, any chance to be able to slow it down. [The White House is saying,] 'Give all that up and then you'll get to see the deal on the other side.' I just don't think that's reasonable."



With a separate vote on Fast Track scheduled for Thursday in the House Ways and Means Committee, the debate in Congress - and across Capitol Hill - has now reached a fevered pitch.

In extended comments from the Senate floor on Wednesday, Sen. Sanders explained his ongoing opposition to TPP and his attempt, though only briefly successful, to slow down the legislative push by TPP proponents who are currently moving as fast as they can to ram the deal through:




And as Sen. Warren concluded in her latest statement, "We've all seen the tricks and traps that corporations hide in the fine print of contracts. We've all seen the provisions they slip into legislation to rig the game in their favor. Now just imagine what they have done working behind closed doors with TPP. We can't keep the American people in the dark.

Comment: The Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement is being negotiated in total secrecy by 12 countries. Despite the wide-ranging effects on the global population, few people have access to the full text of the draft agreement and the public, who it will affect most, have none at all.

The secrecy surrounding the terms is a broad hint that the beneficiaries of this agreement will primarily be transnational corporations and the majority of the global population may well suffer from its effects.


Is the U.S. 'fast-tracking' its way to a toxic nightmare?

WikiLeaks: Updated Secret Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPP) - IP Chapter

The Trans Pacific Partnership paves the way for world government

Monsanto, the Trans-Pacific Partnership, & Global Food Dominance

The Trans-Pacific Partnership clause everyone should oppose

WikiLeaks: Updated Secret Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPP) - IP Chapter



Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi

Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi

This World Is A Dystopian Freak Show, By Any Standards -
But It's Not Going To Stay This Way

April 26 2015 | From: Sott

The world is so messed up that calling it a 'freak show' doesn't quite do it justice...



We need a new word to capture just how backwards, upside down, screwed up, and utterly freakish our world really is. Thankfully, we may have found one, thanks to our friends in Russia and an odious little troll known to inhabit the U.S. State Department until approximately 1 week ago.

The whole world is psaki. We may also have found a word to describe the only proper response to seeing just how psaki the world is, thanks to Jen Psaki's equally cringe-worthy, 'ex-CIA' deputy, Marie.

There's only one thing to do when you're confronted by such a scale of lies: to harf.




Jen Psaki

What makes the world so psaki? Why does it make us want to harf? Well, let's start with the people who inspire the words. What can we say about Jen Psaki and Marie Harf?




Marie Harf

They're both perfect poster children for the banal psychopathology upon which the USA, and by extension the rest of the world, is built. They're oh, so 'normal' with their cute smiles, propensity to humor and the ease with which they handle difficult situations.

They're not just living the American dream, they are the American dream. But closely study these people, what they say and the way they say it, and you realise that those charming traits are used to mask a cold-blooded and ruthless ability to tell bare-faced lies to the world.

And not just any old lies, but lies that obscure the fact that the US government is responsible for the deaths of innocent civilians on a daily basis. When you realise that, the smile and lighthearted manner isn't so 'cute' any more.

Then again, they are the official State Department media liaisons, and therefore are tasked with white-washing the crimes of the massive planetary boil that is the US government and all of its institutions.

Having said that, we took the announcement that Psaki would no longer be gracing the State Dept. stage with her question-dodging and lie-spewing with a bit of disappointment.

Harf was a decent replacement, but Psaki was such an easy target for us to highlight US government duplicity, and her regular 'endearing' blunders and non sequiturs and seeming inability to distinguish truth from falsehood, provided morbid entertainment to those who could see behind the veil of cuteness.

As an example, here's what Psaki had to say on February 23rd about American stooge and president of Yemen, Hadi, who was recently deposed in the coup which sparked the Saudi and US bombardment of Yemen.





Unbelievable. If anyone's 'revising history' it's Psaki. Newsflash, Jen: the Maidan coup in Ukraine was unconstitutional. We would recommend you to actually read the Ukrainian constitution and see for yourself.

Here she is defending Ukrainian PM Arseniy Yatsenyuk calling Russians 'subhumans', and their Foreign Minister calling Putin a "f***er", from June of last year:





As for Mini-Psaki, Marie Harf, here she is giving what she gleefully considers a 'straight answer' to a yes or no question, in which she refuses to answer yes or no. It appears she has graduated from the same school of governmental bullshit as Psaki:





Psaki must have been proud. Nothing is psakier and more harf-worthy than being deliberately obscure, smug, insulting, and presenting black as white. Then again, that's the US government for ya!

Psaki and Harf are just two relatively minor and worthless humans in the grand scheme of things. But their positions make them perfect examples of pretty much everything that is wrong with this uni-polar, US-led global society that is soon to go the way of the dinosaurs:

they lie, they're arrogant, they're smug and self-certain, they're insulting, they're so wrong they're 'not even wrong' about anything of importance, they're apologists for terrorism, torture, murder, and rape.

This is the face of empire: all that is contemptible in human affairs, covered up with expensive clothing, expensive hair-dos, and forced smiles.

In fact, everything is backwards. Chances are, if it's common knowledge - if you hear it coming from the mouthpieces of Western governments, media, and institutions - it's a load of psaki harf.

And it's astounding that lies are so consistently and so strongly peddled and defended, when they're obvious nonsense. Let's look at just a few examples from fields other than politics that are, nonetheless, intrinsically connected to it.


Sinkholes

Twenty years ago, practically no one knew what a sinkhole was. Now there are reports of them swallowing up sections of roads, vehicles, homes, and even people on a daily basis. The official explanations of 'burst pipes' and 'subsidence' are ludicrous.

Obviously something has changed in a pretty fundamental way over the last couple of decades, but no one seems to notice. Even the earth can't seem to 'keep it together' any longer. The planet is 'opening up', and has begun to 'swallow' people, cars and homes.

If that doesn't make people sit up and take notice, we don't know what will...then again, people, in a general sense, are complete idiots. So let's not hold our breaths.

We feel compassion for them, but in the way that you feel compassion for a drowning person who won't allow you to come near them because they won't stop freaking out and threatening to drown both of you. You just have to keep your distance and shake your head in dismay at the tragedy of it all.


Fireballs

Either human life spans have become remarkably short, or something is up in the skies too. Because 'once in a lifetime' fireball/meteor sightings are now extremely frequent. As usual, there is no official explanation, just the repetition of "extremely rare" or "once in a lifetime".

Now and again some NASA fool pops up to explain that there are millions of space rocks circling our planet all the time, so it's not so unusual that we would see them in our atmosphere from time to time...like once in a lifetime, or every day. It's all in the complicated science, so don't think too hard about it, until one lands in your neighborhood.

Even then, don't think too much about it. It was probably a gas explosion or a fertilizer plant exploding for some banal reason. Check out the latest episode of Keeping Up with the Kardashians instead.


Comets

It's not that surprising that no one seems to be noticing the fireballs, seeing how ridiculous comet science has been for the last century. Comets are not dirty snowballs.

That's been obvious for generations, but it doesn't stop so-called scientists from continually being baffled when the obvious smacks them in the face, or when a dirty snowball beats the odds of a snowball's chance in hell and flies through the Sun's atmosphere intact and they still call it a 'dirty snowball'.

NASA scientists are like an educationally challenged infant that just can't seem to figure out that fire burns and keep sticking their hand on the hot plate.


Global Warming

Speaking of shoddy science, you'd think that these idiots would be able to realize that global warming is a fraud for the simple reason that there has been no global warming for the last 18 years.

But facts mean little to government scientists and their lay lackeys, especially when they can be covertly skewed or the declining temperature data 'hidden' in exchange for a fat pay check.


Ukraine

Just take everything Psaki says about Ukraine, turn it into its opposite, and you'll have a pretty good idea of what's really going on. The Maidan coup was illegal, violent, fascist, sponsored by the U.S., and aimed at making Russia angry.

There hasn't been any Russian invasion, the rebels in the east are not terrorists, and the current regime in Kiev is founded on rape, murder, and torture.


Crimea

Crimea democratically chose to return to Russia. Russia didn't 'invade and occupy'. Crimeans are now happy to be part of Russia, much happier than they would have been suffering the "glory of Ukraine" in the form of psychopathic low-life Right Sector terrorists 'cleansing' the region of all things Russian.

Remember that the next time you hear some brain-dead moron bemoaning the 'loss' of Crimea from Ukraine, and Ukraine's 'glorious' ambition to take it back.


Russia

Russia is not an aggressive state. NATO has been the aggressor, and Russia has been responding as reasonably as possible given the psakiness of the morons with which it has to deal (e.g., Dr. Breedlove, or how he learned to stop thinking and love the bomb).

Putin is not the next Hitler; in fact, he's probably the sanest, smartest, most insightful and capable leader on the world stage today, leagues ahead of ineffectual puppets and intellectual minnows like Obama, Hollande, Merkel, Poroshenko, Harper and other harf-inducing excuses for human beings.


Yemen

Hadi was and is a U.S./Saudi puppet. The people didn't want him in power any longer. Rather than take the example of so-called Russian aggression in Crimea as their model - peacefully protecting the civilian population and allowing them to express their will - Saudi Arabia and the rest of the corrupt pseudo-Muslim royal family freaks in the Gulf went with the so-called democratic option: bombing the hell out of the place.


ISIS

ISIS is not the greatest threat to countries like the United States. It is a collection of psychopathic mercenaries created, trained, funded, and armed by Western and Gulf states for the purpose of 'asymmetric' warfare against nations it wishes to destabilize and to prevent from becoming self-sustaining, stable powers in their own right.

The so-called coalition fighting against ISIS is a joke. The airstrikes are ineffective. The U.S. and UK regularly air-drop supplies to ISIS and provide military advisers. It's theater, and very poor theater at that.


Syria

Assad runs a secular, moderate government. He didn't gas his own people. He is doing a better job fighting ISIS than the almost unimaginable might of the 60 nations allegedly 'fighting ISIS'.

That's because ISIS's purpose just happens to be exactly the same as the U.S., Israel's and Saudi Arabia's purpose: to destabilize the region and effect regime change to ensure the status quo is upheld.


Iran

Iran doesn't have a nuclear weapons program. The 'negotiations' are a joke: they are negotiating about a non-existent issue. Iran is shackled with sanctions because Israel and the U.S. want to punish the country, keep it isolated, and make the Middle East 'safe' for Israeli dominance. Israel, in the form of Netanyahu, has been claiming Iran is "about to get the bomb" for 20 years!

Why does anyone take this person seriously? He's obviously not a serious person.


Democracy

Democracy is a hollow word. No, scratch that, it's actually a complete bullshit word devoid of any meaning. Calling the system of government in the 'freedom-loving' West 'democracy' is like saying that inmates of a mental asylum enjoy all the benefits of democracy.

They are free to run around and bang their heads off walls and smear food on their faces all they want. On the other hand, any semblance of real democracy in the world is labelled 'authoritarianism' (as in Russia), or 'illegal' (as in Crimea), by the West, while gross violations of democratic principles and practices are lauded as perfectly all right: illegal invasions, murderous predator drone strikes, systematic torture, stifling of dissent, mass surveillance, rigged elections, false-flag terrorism.

But we suppose that 'rule by the people' still makes sense, if the only 'people' are the 1% and the others are only 'subhumans', as Yats sees Russians.


Police

The police force in the U.S. is no different than an organized crime mob. Actually, scratch that, they're worse. They lie, cheat, steal, rape, and murder without consequence.

They kill more civilians in a month than the UK police force does in a century. They are not here to 'serve and protect'.

Most of the people who want to become cops are people who enjoy power for its own sake, who enjoy violence, and who don't have much going on in the region of the head that usually contains the brain. But they do have a serious inferiority complex. These people should be knocking each other senseless in a boxing ring, not charged with a position of any social responsibility.


Materialism

Modern western culture is shallow, crude, hedonistic. It disparages real thought, values, and spirit. Western philosophy is even worse. Truth is confined to an abstract realm that ignores the facts of human experience, or confined to a narrow category of things that can make money.

When matter is the be-all-end-all, there is no room for values, and anything is permitted: for example, making up test results, silencing authors of unpopular or inconvenient truths, and letting science essentially become a 'propaganda catapult' in service of business interests and profits, not truth and actual social usefulness.


Diet

Have you noticed that almost all the food that 'they' said would kill you in no time at all 20 years ago is now sort of essential for optimal health? And conversely, all that you were meant to stuff down your gullet with wild abandon is now being described as possibly deadly?

Who are these jackasses that pass themselves off as doctors and scientists? The fact of the matter is that pretty much everything you think is true in the realm of medicine and health is probably completely wrong.

We wonder how that happened? Saturated fat bad for you? Nope. Cigarettes the biggest killer? Not even close. Carbs are good for you? Fat chance. We eat the wrong foods, swallow pills we don't need, suffer and die, all to feed an industry more interested in making a buck than making us better.

So there you have it. Anyone who has any issue with any of the above, please feel free to write to your local, state or federal politician so he or she can have a good laugh at your letter and carry on wasting/stealing your tax dollars; covering up the evidence that they and their ilk enjoy sexually abusing your children and teaching you to do the same, until your children are old enough to be conned (and encouraged by you) into joining the military (or a bank) and thereby contributing to the murder of innocents in "far off lands" for the profit of the same kind of psychopaths to whom you sent your complaint letter.

Enjoy it while it lasts. Because it ain't gonna.


Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi

Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi

WIRED Magazine Now Totally Admits What The Entire Media Called 'Loony Conspiracy Theories' Just Five Years Ago To Be Real
April 25 2015 | From: NaturalNews

Remember when it was considered the subject matter of tin foil hat-wearers to surmise that everything we do, say, or search for online is being tracked by covert government agencies acting in blatant violation of the U.S. Constitution?



Well, now it's become common knowledge that we live in this exact, illicit surveillance society, as is now openly admitted by popular media sites such as WIRED.

A recent piece by the site's Bruce Schneier lifts a veil on the mass surveillance activities taking place by the likes of the National Security Agency (NSA), whose cover was blown by whistleblower Edward Snowden in 2013, and subsequently by several others.

Initially, it was thought that such technological capacity only existed in sci-fi films, and that surely government agencies don't have the time or resources to collect information on, well, everyone.

But now it turns out that this premise is actually a reality -- the military-industrial complex, in the name of "national security" and
the faux "war on terror" is actively collecting what Schneier explains is a treasure trove of metadata on practically every [western person] American.

And it is doing so without consent or constitutional approval, with seemingly no recourse for those who would choose, if they could, to opt-out.

"We may not like to admit it, but we are under mass surveillance," writes Schneier for WIRED, dispelling all accusations that government spying is some kind of loony conspiracy theory.


NSA and other treasonous organizations surveil Americans to maintain military dictatorship, not to protect "national security"

In his eye-opening report, Schneier highlights the difference between data, or more precisely the content of a person's conversations and emails, and metadata, which he dubs the context of a person's entire life. By simply analyzing who you call regularly rather than what you're actually saying during a call, for example, agencies like the NSA are able to compile what they believe to be an accurate profile of what you're doing and thinking.

Based on this information, the powers that be believe they're entitled to make decisions about your "threat" level - not in terms of a real threat to freedom or liberty, of course,
but a threat to the establishment that's fighting wars, destroying economies, and controlling the world, in essence, in the construction of a centralized world order.

It's all about power and control, in other words, and the cohort of metadata that can be gathered through internet search histories, mobile phone calls, and other sinister tracking protocols is the direct means to this end.

Your privacy isn't a concern in any of this, and the corporations involved in making these data mining activities a reality are oftentimes just accessories to treason.

Because in truth, the activities of agencies like the NSA are what really constitute terrorism, not the everyday movements, thoughts, and communications of a supposedly "free" people.

Data mining and spying by the government are both patently criminal activities, and no amount of "national security" propaganda will ever change that fact. And yet these practices continue because most people aren't willing to stop them.


"Metadata absolutely tells you everything about somebody's life," admitted NSA General Counsel and traitor Stewart Baker about what our infiltrated government apparatus is up to when it comes to tracking the population.

"If you have enough metadata you don't really need content. We kill people based on metadata."

In the words of the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF):


"The U.S. government ... has engaged in massive, illegal dragnet surveillance of the domestic communications and communications records of millions of ordinary Americans at least 2001."


Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi

Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi

China’s AIIB Could Help Global Infrastructure Projects
April 24 2015 | From: WorldReview

The International Monetary Fund and the World Bank, two Bretton Woods’ institutions established in 1944, remain, although the landmark system for monetary and exchange rate management devised then was abandoned in the 1970s



Washington is losing its clout. Its allies in Europe - the UK, Germany, France and Italy - have applied to become members of the China-led Asia Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB), defying US calls for them to exercise caution

The IMF was created to provide short-term liquidity to troubled countries with balance-of-payments problems, while the World Bank’s job consisted in financing investment projects, such as infrastructure, particularly in undeveloped countries.

Both institutions have been under the control of the advanced Western economies and have become obsolete, writes World Review expert Professor Enrico Colombatto.

The IMF’s original mission no longer makes sense in a world with flexible exchange rates, where a balance of payments problem leads to currency depreciation rather than draining reserves.

The international community has reinterpreted the role of the IMF by transforming it into the central bankers’ bank, but its success has been limited.

IMF resources are inadequate to affect international capital markets let alone remedy a global financial crisis. The World Bank has failed to promote development and has wasted considerable resources in questionable projects.

Yet the international community has kept these agencies alive.

Now the Chinese government has taken action. Rather than taking over the existing agencies - a task which would have involved endless negotiations and led to meagre outcomes - Beijing has created a new organisation aimed at bringing together financial rigour and political neutrality, and eventually out-competing the IMF and the World Bank.

The new agency, promoted by China, is the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) and has already proved to be highly successful in attracting members from across the globe.

The description ‘Asian’ justifies China’s leadership and, by hinting at its regional scope, allows the IMF or the World Bank to save face.

The size of the AIIB seems relatively modest. Its capital should amount to between US$50-100 billion - less than a fifth of the World Bank’s US$500 billion capital, and a fraction of the World Bank’s Asian branch, the Asian Development Bank.


But, make no mistake, the AIIB will be a powerful player on the world scene, if successful because:

Asia will be the world’s fastest growing area for some time to come

This newly-born agency will have a strong and virtually undisputed leadership

It is unlikely the AIIB will stop at Asia

The Chinese will not stop providing adequate funding in excess of the initial amount.

The Chinese government is clearly interested in packaging its new creature as a technocratic multilateral agency, but the authorities in Beijing will ensure they play a hegemonic role.

The Chinese initiative has raised alarm in many quarters. Yet, it seems very few countries can afford to be left out of the huge economic area which the Chinese are aspiring to help and possibly control.

Forty-seven countries - including Russia, India, the UK, Germany and France - had already applied to join the AIIB by the end of March 2015. One applicant - North Korea - has been turned down.

Both the IMF and the World Bank have shown their limits, and a reluctance to bring about reforms and/or put forward new ideas means these two institutions will play an increasingly marginal role in future, from an economic and a geopolitical perspective.

More generally, the birth of the AIIB will be a welcome opportunity to think again about the very notion of a multilateral development agency.

There is a need for clearer rules of the game or transparency within the donors’ cartel, and this is something Beijing has promised to meet. We believe that unless the Chinese blunder, the AIIB will be successful.

Multilateral financing for development projects boils down to a donors’ cartel.

Western political elites have been unable to manage such a cartel effectively enough for a variety of reasons - lack of adequate leadership and/or satisfactory control over the cartel’s bureaucracy.

The donors’ community has de facto agreed that a different leadership might produce better results with less wastage and more interesting business opportunities in the future.

Understandably, some Western partners of AIIB are wary.

The AIIB, rather than being a source of complaint or mistrust, could be an opportunity to recognise past mistakes, make up for lost time, and start thinking about better and more appealing solutions for the future, especially if the Chinese experiment fails in terms of vision, accountability and transparency.


Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi

Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi

Uprooted & Evicted: World Bank-Funded Projects Force Millions Off Their Land
April 24 2015 | From: RT

World Bank ventures in less developed countries are hurting the people the organization has sworn to protect, with almost four million people across the globe left homeless, forcefully evicted and relocated as a result of World Bank-funded projects



A probe by the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ), which examined World Bank's records in 14 countries, discovered that some 3.4 million of the “most vulnerable people” were forced off their land in the last decade.

The World Bank “has regularly failed to live up to its own policies for protecting people harmed by projects it finances,” ICIJ states as one of its key findings.


The World Bank as well as the International Finance Corporation (IFC), which distributes the funds, have invested $455 billion in nearly 7,200 projects between 2004 and 2013 in the developing world, ICIJ says. More than 400 were confirmed to have caused the permanent displacement of local communities, while another 550 may have made locals homeless.


“An ICIJ analysis found that between 20 and 30 percent of all projects the bank funded from 2004 to 2013 were deemed likely to cause resettlement,” report’s summary reads.

The World Bank finances thousands of projects ranging from major oil pipelines and dams to small schools and clinics. In some countries the organization reportedly closed its eyes to numerous human rights violations. The ICIJ investigation was surprised to discover that in some instances, the World Bank continued to fund projects in “undemocratic” states even after evidence of abuses such as rape and torture emerged.

For instance in Ethiopia, former officials told journalists that the state used millions of dollars from health and education projects to fund a violent campaign of mass evictions of local populations. Yet despite numerous complaints from human rights groups and the indigenous Anuak population, the World Bank disputed claims that their money has been misused or misappropriated.

Kenyan forest conservation project using World Bank cash is claimed to be another example where funds were used to chase locals out of their ancestral homes.

The 11-month-long ICIJ investigation revealed that most of forced resettlement cases appear to take place in Asia and Africa. In Asia almost 3 million people were either left homeless or resettled, while in Africa that number stands at over 400,000.

The organization’s investment in China resulted in the resettlement of at least 1 million people, the investigation said.

In Vietnam alone some 1.2 million people were displaced during the construction of dams and power plants by the organization.


“Research has shown that millions of people have lost their livelihood and have been pushed into conditions of poverty because of large hydro-electric dams,” environmental and human rights activist and director of Right and Ecology, Annie Bird, told RT.

“It is an investment which has not resulted in furthering the mandate of the World Bank, which is eliminating poverty.”

The full list of affected countries also include Albania, Brazil, China, Ethiopia, Honduras, Ghana, Guatemala, India, Kenya, Kosovo, Nigeria, Peru, Serbia, South Sudan and Uganda.

From 2009 to 2013, the study found, World Bank Group lenders “pumped $50 billion into projects graded highest risk for their “irreversible or unprecedented'” social or environmental impact. That numbers, the authors estimate, is twice as much as the previous five-year span.

ICIJ informed World Bank of their discoveries in March, warning of “systemic gaps”.


“We took a hard look at ourselves on resettlement and what we found caused me deep concern,” Jim Yong Kim, the World Bank’s president, said in a statement at the time.

“One is that we haven’t done a good enough job in overseeing projects involving resettlement.”

The organization also compiled a five page “action plan” that it said would improve its programs.

“We must and will do better,” said David Theis, a World Bank spokesman, in response to the reporting team’s questions.

As the largest contributor to the Wold Bank, the US government is largely to blame for the organization’s shortcomings, Bird believes.


“The Bank could take measures to find alternatives for people who are losing their livelihoods to large infrastructure projects, it has just never been prioritized,” she says.

“I think a lot of responsibility for that lies with the member nations, particularly with the United States government which has the largest share and voting power in the World Bank and therefore sets an important part of the Bank’s lending agenda.”

Learn more about what the real agenda of the World Bank here.


Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi

Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi
News Archives



 

Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi


Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi

This website is optimised for viewing in Mozilla Firefox

Fair Dealing Notice

These pages / videos may contain copyrighted (©) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorised by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democratic, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. With reference to The New Zealand Copyright Act 1994 such material is made available for critical, review, educational purposes and the reporting of current events. In accordance with The New Zealand Copyright Act 1994, this material is distributed without profit to those with a general interest in such information for research and education.

Fair Use Notice

These pages / videos may contain copyrighted (©) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorised by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democratic, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those with a general interest in such information for research and education.

Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi

Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi
 
 
Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi
Wake Up Kiwi
Wake Up Kiwi
Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi Wake Up Kiwi