Paper beats rock

In fact, it’s estimated that the paper gold market – which should be a derivative of the physical market – is actually some 100 times larger than the physical market – ie, if everyone holding paper gold ‘stood for delivery’ at the same time, it would be impossible for every party to fulfil their obligations.

The central banks don’t like it

Because the derivative market is so large, paper gold makes physical gold’s market price. This is a problem for nervous central banks because when prices are perverted in this way, it causes anomalies in the market.

The big one right now is how the gold price seems to be completely out of kilter with underlying demand.

For example, how on earth can China and others be importing such massive amounts of physical gold – and yet the gold price refuses to budge? All sorts of theories have been posited. One is that major Western central banks have been providing physical supply to balance the books, by leasing gold into the market.

But here’s the rub: this gold may belong to other nations, which is causing anxiety for countries that rely on the Western depositories to store their gold.

World to banks: Where’s my gold?

First, it was the Venezuela’s Hugo Chavez that kicked up a stink. He demanded Venezuela’s gold back from London and the US. That was a few years ago now. Some astute nations took note. After all, Venezuela’s holdings are the 15th largest in the world – this was no piddling amount.

Then about a year and half ago, Germany was rumoured to be asking for an audit of its gold held in foreign depositories. Supposedly the American custodians said take a hike. We don’t know if that’s true or not. But what we do know is that shortly afterwards, the Germans asked for much of their gold back. 674 tons, in fact – 374 from Banque de France and 300 from the US Fed in Manhattan.

Now, this certainly wasn’t a piddling amount either. But if the stuff was in the vaults, then what’s the problem? Well, you can only imagine the Germans response to the announcement that the transfer, of their gold back to them, would take eight years to fulfil.

“What? Eight years? The Venezuelans took delivery within a couple of months. What’s going on here?”

What indeed? Perhaps the Americans placated the German delegation thus:

“Now, now, keep calm. Don’t make a fuss. If you rock the boat and everyone gets nervous, this process could take a lot longer! We don’t want anyone else getting concerned.”

A full year after Germany asked for its gold back, a trifling 37 tons had been delivered. That’s way off the 87 tons envisaged… and even that figure was allowing eight full years for delivery. What’s more, a paltry five tons came from the US. The rest was from Paris.

When asked about progress on getting its gold back, the Bundesbank was rather coy. Don’t worry, they said.

They would, though, wouldn’t they? It would hardly help to have other nations knocking on the Fed’s door asking for theirs back too now, would it?

The rumour mill is back in action

More recently, Austria was said to be giving its London custodians a prod. A report in Austrian magazine Trend suggested they were planning to send auditors to check on the country’s gold holdings in the Bank of England.

Hey up, this is how the German repatriation thing started! And Austria is no gold slouch either. Its IMF-reported reserves top 280 tons. That’s nearly half Austria’s foreign exchange reserves. They like the stuff!

In response to the rumour mill, Ewald Nowotny, governor of Austria’s central bank, recently played down matters:

“I acknowledge the request. Any grocery store is obliged to do inventory once a year.”

So the rumours of the audit appear to be true, then. And once again, the central bank tells everyone there’s nothing to see here. As I said – they would, wouldn’t they? If there’s going to be a run, then get in line early, and don’t go shouting about it.

The perfect crime

Everything I’ve laid out above is conjecture, of course. But don’t be surprised to learn that the central banks have been ‘leasing’ gold into the markets. In fact, we know for sure that they do – they’ve admitted as much.

And unlike dumping the stuff in the market – like Gordon Brown did with half our pot – lending the stuff can be done more surreptitiously. In fact, it’s the perfect crime. This way they can dump it on the markets, and still record it on their own balance sheet.

And why not? The stuff is supposed to come back again after the lease is up. But this isn’t like shorting shares. In the bullion markets, once the bullion has been lent short and dumped on the market, it’s mostly smelted into new bars that are demanded in Asia. It’s then shipped and stored in brand new vaults all over the globe.

Getting this stuff back after the lease is up could prove difficult for all the banks and hedge funds that have been shorting the stuff. ‘Only five tons delivery in one year’ kind of difficult!

Of course, if this story has legs, then it won’t be endorsed by any official any time soon. Mum’s the word. It makes you wonder, doesn’t it? Venezuela, Germany, Austria… where are the whispering rumours gathering next?

And could there be an almighty run on the Western custodian banks to come?

Watch this space.

Al Gore, the man charged with popularising the global warming theory, uses 20 times the energy of the average person in just one of his multi-million dollar homes, yet his ”carbon footprint” is never put under a spot light.

Few remember how as Vice President he used his “Earth in the Balance” environmental cred to stump for passage of NAFTA and Free Trade policies, which started the environmental race to the bottom and the wholesale giving away of local power over land and laws to multinational corporations.

Now Gore is investing with partners like Goldman Sachs in carbon trading schemes, espousing the self-enriching solution to a problem he defines. It would seem subscribers to the theory of global warming never question the designation of CO2, as the root of our environmental problems and its convenient, consequent value as a global taxable trading currency founded on the commodification of nature and a newly invented “right to pollute”.

This unverifiable system run by bankers will accelerate, not slow, the pillaging of the planet.

It is my observation that all aspects of the left alternative media from the progressive weeklies to KPFA radio, are conducting the environmental wing of the global war on terror, never missing an opportunity to frighten and guilt trip us that we will cause “game over for the planet” if we don’t vote for “climate change legislation”, aka, carbon taxes and carbon trading, and support “smart growth” policies.

We are schooled that only crazy right-wingers could possibly question the “settled science” and the “settled” remedies.

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) is always cited as the trusted go-to body of expertise, even though their integrity was discredited with the “Climategate” scandal based on leaked emails, in which head scientists at the IPCC, Michael Mann of Penn State and Phil Jones of East Anglia University discussed doctoring the data on the “hockey stick” graph created by Mann, and punishing scientists and scientific journals that print contradictory evidence to the theory of global warming.

So many are now feeding at the trough of climate change disaster capitalism that a rational open debate is almost impossible. City councils throughout the land are curiously all subscribing to the same developer, banker- enriching, land-grabbing policies of “smart growth”.

Unelected, unaccountable regional boards, made up of selected local officials, along with corporations and non governmental organizations are drawing up dictatorial regional plans for growth that supercede city governments, depriving citizens of the right to affect their own local land use policy.

In the name of climate change remediation, we are told we must pack more people into smaller areas of land, as our towns are being transformed into mega Manhattanized cities with tall multi-unit apartment buildings that take our sunlight, and ultimately our connection to the land and nature.

Old buildings, neighborhoods, and communities are wastefully being torn down and made over to fit the vision of elite ideologue urban planners. In the upheaval, small local independent businesses are lost and replaced with national chains.

This is not protection of nature, but a transfer of wealth, power, property ownership, and autonomy of cities, towns and rural areas, away from ordinary citizens.

Today’s "environmentalists" are working towards increased government and corporate control and surveillance over our lives through bio-hazardous technology, ie. smart grid and smart meters, with no regard for thousands of independent scientific studies proving that digital microwave radiation damages biology.

Instead of a call to decentralise, simplify and conserve, citizens worldwide are being forced to apply “smart” meters to their homes, even as they are complaining of heart palpitations, extreme fatigue, mental confusion, sleeplessness, headaches, ear ringing, dizziness and more.

A technology is neither “green” nor “sustainable” if it’s byproduct harms humans, insects, plants and animals. This unseen pollution from smart meters and smart grid infrastructure is increasing exponentially with no objections from official environmentalists.

Unlike the old meters, smart meters use energy to power themselves 24/7. They are only advantageous to a centralized corporate model of energy control.

Most shockingly, the left, who claim to have the corner on environmental stewardship, are the ones giving credence to geoengineering-solar radiation management, (the spraying of chemical nanoparticle pollution, such as aluminum oxide and sulphur dioxide via jet aircraft into the atmosphere in order to block the sun), as a solution for global warming.

On May 9, 2013, the Earth Island Institute sponsored a debate cavalierly dubbed, “Hack the Sky?” at the Brower Center in Berkeley CA. The purported adversaries were Stanford geoengineer, Ken Caldiera, and so called “ethicist”, Clive Hamilton, who belongs to the same geoengineering promoting, Solar Radiation Management Governance Group with Caldiera and other geoengineers. That very morning the two “debaters” made an appearance on liberal KALW’s “Your Call”.

A few months later the apprentices on Progressive radio KPFA”s “Full Circle” hosted the same performance duo. Why are environmental groups and left media putting on rigged debates legitimising and normalising a preposterous technology, which poisons and desecrates nature, and can only cause irreparable harm, when they should be screaming warnings from the rafters that scientists are recklessly playing God with our world.

These left media outlets are unconscionably frightening their following into accepting what amounts to nothing less than the corporate scientific intervention into our natural weather and climate systems.

The environmental establishment chooses to ignore a whole area of inquiry relevant and crucial to the climate change equation; that of scientific, military, university, and governmental, (NASA and NOAA) experimentation with our atmosphere and weather, which has been going on for many decades.

The book “Angels Don’t Play This HAARP” by Nick Begich and Jeanne Manning, documents the history of military experimentation with the earth’s atmosphere, and chronicles the development (including twelve patents) of the High Frequency Active Auroral Research Project, (HAARP), a field of giant antennas which can boil the upper atmosphere with a focused steerable billion watt electromagnetic beam, sending electromagnetic waves back onto a target on earth, causing changes in the jet stream and weather.





The Department of Defense and their military contractors operate outside of all laws that protect the environment.

Ironically, the climate change activists of today are listening to and trusting the very moneyed, powerful entities who have brought us to the brink of ecological collapse and forced us into fossil fuel dependency, for diagnosis and treatment of our environmental calamities.

The Rockefellers, one of the biggest funders and grant givers to the current environmental “movement”, have throughout the decades, used their wealth and influence derived from BIG OIL to remain in control of energy.

They financed Prohibition in the 1920s and '30s to keep farmers from making their own alcohol fuel, and worked to criminalize hemp, from which fuel was made. They killed the electric car and the municipal electric railways and influenced our government to suppress more than 5000 energy technology patents, which have potential to end our energy crisis.

The rhetoric we hear of creating economic and environmental equity among people and nations, rings hollow when you realize that the environmental establishment is being bought and commandeered by the richest fat cats in the world, who have the inordinate means to create equity overnight, and to stop their destructive environmental practices, if that were their true purpose.

Instead they are financing and manufacturing a phony grassroots campaign to pin the blame for environmental devastation on the “everyman” who is living in a world choreographed by the corporate financial elite.

Their message is that the future of the planet is impossible unless we the little people submit to the measures outlined by them. They have frightened, panicked, and demoralized the very people who would be fighting them with every breath into being the enforcement arm for their vision of our future.

Fear of climate change is being manipulated to get the left to aid in the stealing of citizen rights and the corporatization of our local government, land, business, nature and weather.

While the environmentalists are stuck on climate change, the nuclear accidents, toxic spills, pesticide contamination, deep sea oil drilling, fracking, tree cutting, electromagnetic radiation, introduction into the ecosystem of new dangerous technological compounds and organisms like GMOS, synthetic biology, nanoparticles, the geoengineering of our skies, destructive war and weapons, and much more, continue unabated.

Now left wing pundits like The Nation’s, Mark Hertsgaard, tell us to be impressed, that the big time financial fleecers and scammers, “Hank” Paulsen, hedgefund billionaire, Tom Steyer and Michael Bloomberg have come on board with climate change, as if they haven’t always been. The War On Climate Change has gone publicly mainstream as the likes of BP, Goldman Sachs, J.P. Morgan, Dow Chemical bankrolled the “Peoples” climate march in New York City in Sept. 2014.

No. It is way past time for the left to question where blind belief in billionaire, banker funded environmentalism is taking us.

Which Cities & States Will Be The First To Default When The Economy Rolls Over?

Central Bankers & US Government Now Preparing For Dodd Frank Basel III Bail-Ins.

Iceland Dismantles The Corrupt, Arrests 10 Rothschild Bankers, Then Issues Interpol Arrest Warrant For Rothschild Banker Sigurdur Einarsson.

In essence, the Cyprus template of 2011 will be fully implemented in every major economy, and place bank depositors as the primary instrument of the next bailouts when the next crisis occur

Rothschilds Attacks Russian Cyprus Holdings: Russia Launches Surprise Large-Scale, 36 Warship Military Exercise In The Black Sea

For most Americans with savings or checking accounts in federally insured banks, normal FDIC rules on deposit insurance are still in play, but anyone with over $250,000 in any one account, or held offshore, will have their money automatically subject to bankruptcy dispursements from the courts based on a much lower rank of priority, and a much lower percentage of return.

This also includes business accounts, money market accounts, and any depository investments such as a certificate of deposit (CD).

After Sunday at the G20 meeting, the risks of holding any cash in a bank or financial institution will have to be weighed as heavily and with as much determination of risk as if you were holding a stock or municipal bond, which could decline in an instant should the financial environment bring a crisis even remotely similar to that of 2008.

From a technical perspective, this is moving in line with Murray Rothbard’s perspective on “bank deposit insurance,” which he saw as a scam:

Fractional reserve banking proved shaky, and so the New Deal, in 1933, added the lie of “bank deposit insurance,” using the benign word “insurance” to mask an arrant hoax. When the savings and loan system went down the tubes in the late 1980s, the “deposit insurance” of the federal FSLIC [Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation] was unmasked as sheer fraud. The “insurance” was simply the smoke-and-mirrors term for the unbacked name of the federal government. The poor taxpayers finally bailed out the S&Ls, but now we are left with the formerly sainted FDIC [Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation], for commercial banks, which is now increasingly seen to be shaky, since the FDIC itself has less than one percent of the huge number of deposits it “insures.” The very idea of “deposit insurance” is a swindle; how does one insure an institution (fractional reserve banking) that is inherently insolvent, and which will fall apart whenever the public finally understands the swindle? Suppose that, tomorrow, the American public suddenly became aware of the banking swindle, and went to the banks tomorrow morning and in unison demanded cash. What would happen? The banks would be instantly insolvent, since they could only muster 10 percent of the cash they owe their befuddled customers. Neither would the enormous tax increase needed to bail everyone out be at all palatable. No: the only thing the Fed could do and this would be in their power, would be to print enough money to pay off all the bank depositors. Unfortunately, in the present state of the banking system, the result would be an immediate plunge into the horrors of hyperinflation.

Thus, the removal of protection for large depositors is eliminating the scam at this tier. It is, in other words, cutting down on moral hazard.

I suspect what is going on here is that the government is fully aware that this change will create a separation between bank deposits and government securities.

Government securities, especially short-term paper, will become a safer investment than large banks deposits. This will drive funds away from banks, private sector lending, and push funds into the direction of government sponsored debt (where there will be continued back up for such debt of the money printing presses).

Also See: Warning: Bank Deposits Will Soon No Longer Be Seen As Money But Paper Investments

Rothschild’s Federal Reserve Printed Fiat Dollars 4Xs The Value Of The Global Gold Supply In 2013 Alone

“I’m concerned that you are negotiating the Trans-Pacific Partnership agreement in secret, without public consultation. All I can find out about the TPPA is based on leaked documents and detective work. This is not acceptable. New Zealand is a democracy, which means that Kiwis have the right to know what is done in our name and to have a say. The TPPA will have a huge impact on New Zealanders, and we want to have a say. Make the negotiations public, and don’t trade away our future."

For more information on the TPPA, please visit: www.itsourfuture.org.nz

Also see: TPP Conclusion In 2015 Still 'Challenging', Says Power

"We receive complaints every year from property owners with a mortgage complaining their bank paid off their rates arrears to the local council and then took the amount from their account,” said Banking Ombudsman Deborah Battell.

"“It affects a relatively small number of people but ratepayers sometimes contact us because they are already under considerable financial pressure. Seeing their account debited for rates arrears can be a shock,” said Ms Battell.

They haven’t authorised the debit
Tthe bank failed to notify them
Non-payment of rates is part of wider dispute with their local authority.

“Our investigations into these complaints consider whether bank communication and information is adequate. It is usual bank practice to inform customers about the debit." “We are not generally able to overturn payments but if we find the bank has done something wrong we will consider whether compensation for distress or inconvenience is warranted,” Ms Battell said.

Those relatively riskless returns are gone forever, and what we are witnessing in Japan today is a desperate and perverse attempt to recreate the same secure income streams, which are fundamental to a life spent prudently saving one's hard earned wealth, via a central bank mandated synthetically juiced Nikkei Stock Average.

Regrettably, equities can never replace the security of steady moderate income provided by a normalized Treasury Bond market.

Furthermore, in an environment of flatline economic growth, a reflated equity market will not only be unable to generate those same reliable constant returns over time, but will also put those very savings themselves completely at risk.

They have built a Doomsday machine, and thanks to BlackRock's [for detail on who Blackrock are and how they fit into the global scheme of things click here] Larry Fink we are now seeing it being fired up and launched in Tokyo.

The US Federal Reserve announced it is ceasing Quantitative Easing this week too. Make no mistake, the cataclysmic abomination is fast approaching us as well.

The Fed said it was confident the US economic recovery would continue, despite a global economic slowdown.


Comment: And so the news is now official that the cabal are about to turn off their funny-money printing presses in the US. No matter what the spin they might try to put on this, nobody really knows for sure how this will impact the markets.

However; it is well known that the QE programme was the only thing keeping the US economy afloat; whilst further ushering the value of the 'Fed Dollar' to the inevitable (and engineered) point of value = zero.

There has been no such thing as the "US Dollar" since the Rothschild-instigated private banking-family owned cartel that formed the international Reserve Banking system was designed in 1913. What has been since referred to as the "US Dollar" and subsequently enforced as the global Reserve Currency, (or the 'Petrodollar') has never been anything other than a baseless, ever depreciating debt reference record.

With many other nations (including but not limited to the BRICS Alliance nations) now aborting that criminal and private Reserve Banking cartel standard 'currency' - the playing field is no longer tilted in terms of the favour of the Khazarian Nazionists.

And so there will be more reports of 'flying banksters', deceased heads' of criminal family empires - and scuttling, formerly well paid-off corporate and government underlings, coming to light as events continue to unfold - and more publicly than ever before.


The targets for inflation and reduction in unemployment were on track, the Fed said in a statement.

The central bank, which also said it would not raise interest rates for a "considerable time", has gradually cut back QE since last year.

The statement suggested that although the jobs market is strengthening, it is still not back to normal, which is why interest rates are being held.

"The Committee continues to see sufficient underlying strength in the broader economy to support ongoing progress toward maximum employment in a context of price stability," the Fed said.

Analysts said the news was in line with expectations.

"The Fed's announcement is exactly what everyone expected," said Wayne Kaufman, chief market analyst at Phoenix Financial, in New York. "The Fed sees enough improvement in economic activity to end QE, but at the same time, it will keep low rates because it isn't yet seeing what it wants to see as far as inflation goes," he said.

Several analysts seized on the Fed's comments about slack in the labour market. Previous policy statements have referred to "significant underutilization of labor resources".

Wednesday's statement left out the word "significant".

Paul Ashworth, chief US economist at Capital Economics, said: "In light of the latest drop in the unemployment rate to below 6%, the dropping of "significant" could be, well... significant."

Brian Jacobsen, strategist at Wells Fargo Funds Management, added: "I was pleasantly surprised that they removed the reference to there being significant underutilization of labour resources. I think that is a hat tip to some of the progress being made in the labour market." [Which is a load of BS as the figures are cooked].

US shares were down ahead of the statement and continued to drift lower after the news was announced.

QE started in November 2008 amid the financial crisis and fears that the US, and the rest of the world, might be facing another great depression.

The Fed's traditional ammunition, cutting interest rates, was running low - there was one more cut the following month, taking the main interest rate target down to practically zero.

So the central bank began buying financial assets and creating new money to pay for them.

In total, the Fed has added $3.7tn worth of assets to its holdings, about an eightfold increase.

BBC economics correspondent Andrew Walker said that although the US economy is improving, the moderate unemployment rate does not tell the whole story.

"There are still many people working part-time who would rather have longer hours, and many people not looking for jobs who are not counted as unemployed but would actually like to work. And long term unemployment is still a serious problem." "The end of QE will nonetheless be an important milestone in the repair of the US economy," he said.

Recent data has pointed to increase spending by consumers and businesses. However, the housing market is still struggling and pay is stagnant.

There is concern about the long-term impact of the US's persistent low inflation, which risks undermining consumer spending as people delay purchases in the hope that prices will fall further.

Also see: How Will THe Stock Market React To The End Of Quantitative Easing?

Michael Maloney is the producer and host of Hidden Secrets of Money, an acclaimed investment education series that aims to enlighten the world that maximum prosperity can only be achieved through individual freedom, free markets, and sound money.

Known for the best-selling precious metals investment book of all time, Guide to Investing in Gold and Silver, Mike has become a persistent leader in helping demystify what is behind the currency curtain and the historic economic shifts that lead to wealth transfer.

Hidden Secrets of Money is Mike’s latest video series that explores the history of currency and money, the difference between the two and, how in today’s modern economy the historic rules of economic change persist.

Mike has been a regular speaker alongside financial educator Robert Kiyosaki, author of the "Rich Dad, Poor Dad" series, and has been a featured speaker at investment seminars all over the world. He founded GoldSilver.com in 2005 to establish a trusted online source for ordinary people to buy gold and silver with the knowledge and understanding of how the economics of gold and silver play out over time in a persistent cycle.

"I believe that the best investment that you'll ever make in your lifetime is your own financial education" - Mike Maloney "Mike, you're a great investor, great businessman, great engineer, math genius, great researcher, but your real desire in life isn't about money. You claim your start in the business was as a result for the need to be educated about money and its origins, but I disagree about that being the primary reason for your start. Your joy isn't about making money. I don't see that in your eyes. What I see is... you are happiest when you're teaching others about what you have learned and have mastered." - scidhumouse100

Michael Maloney has been shouting from the rooftops about the world economy and showing people the fire exits since 2002. Watch the video below to see him at the Silver Summit in 2005, making some bold predictions that all came true. Mike was calling a hyper bubble in real estate at the time...while Ben Bernanke was denying any kind of real estate trouble as late as 2007.

Three of the banks are Greek, three are Italian, Two are Austrian, one is in Cyprus, one is Belgian and one is Portuguese, according to the report.

It definitely looks like there was a market reaction: here’s the euro falling against the dollar just as the report broke at 3:46 a.m. ET.

Full results on the stress tests are out this Sunday, deliberately timed out of market hours.

The stakes on the asset quality review, as the tests are formally known, are huge. Capital Economics’ Jessica Hinds explains here (emphasis hers):

Given that previous stress tests failed to expose serious problems in a number of key financial institutions – some were given a clean bill of health only to need rescuing just months later — there is a lot at stake, not least the ECB’s reputation and confidence in the entire euro-zone banking sector.

For a more in-depth look, see the following documentary.


We Got F*cked 2012

A feature length, not for for profit documentary that looks into the world of banking and fiat currency using scenes from various movies and media sources from across the galaxy.

It is made to analyse the actions taken by government and the people in the midst of the financial crises. This feature length documentary is made by Dejavusion Productions and Lucas Media using a variety of sources, using inspiration from a wide spectrum the documentary is built into chapters and can be viewed at your leisure. The thoughts and expressions examined in this video do not necessarily reflect those that feature.

With thanks to the rightholders and their generosity (due to the CREATIVE COMMONS & Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scolarship and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favour of fair use) for this video to be released.

Researchers from the Melbourne Sustainable Society Institute (MSSI) at the University of Melbourne used data from the last 40 years to compare to predictions made by the authors of the 1972 book “Limits to Growth.” They focused on what the original authors termed the “business-as-usual” (BAU) or “standard run” scenario, collating it to what has actually happened since the publication.

Just two years after the globe celebrated its first Earth Day in 1970, Italian think tank Club of Rome commissioned researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), led by husband-and-wife team Donella and Dennis Meadows, to build a computer model to track the world’s economy and environment. They looked at industrialization, population, food, use of resources and pollution through 1970.

Read the full story at: RT

Libya is in civil war, fundamentalist armies are building a self-declared caliphate across Syria and Iraq and Afghanistan’s young democracy is on the verge of paralysis.

To these troubles are added a resurgence of tensions with Russia and a relationship with China divided between pledges of cooperation and public recrimination. The concept of order that has underpinned the modern era is in crisis.

The search for world order has long been defined almost exclusively by the concepts of Western societies. In the decades following World War II, the U.S. - strengthened in its economy and national confidence - began to take up the torch of international leadership and added a new dimension.

A nation founded explicitly on an idea of free and representative governance, the U.S. identified its own rise with the spread of liberty and democracy and credited these forces with an ability to achieve just and lasting peace.

The traditional European approach to order had viewed peoples and states as inherently competitive; to constrain the effects of their clashing ambitions, it relied on a balance of power and a concert of enlightened statesmen. The prevalent American view considered people inherently reasonable and inclined toward peaceful compromise and common sense; the spread of democracy was therefore the overarching goal for international order.

Free markets would uplift individuals, enrich societies and substitute economic interdependence for traditional international rivalries.

This effort to establish world order has in many ways come to fruition. A plethora of independent sovereign states govern most of the world’s territory. The spread of democracy and participatory governance has become a shared aspiration if not a universal reality; global communications and financial networks operate in real time.

Read more at: WallStreetJournal


In the past, Kissinger and other globalists have explained various aspects of the New World Order:






Alex Jones breaks down the existence of the New World Order which Kissinger is now advocating:

In a world where council rates and infrastructure costs are conitinually on the increase, in most places the CAFR (Comprehensive Annual Financial Report) Accounting system is used, which hides wealth and provides the 'powers that be' with more reason to financially rape and pillage the people.

While much of the content below pertains to the US, the principles in play with CAFR Accounting are used in most countries.


Examples include:

New Zealand Treasury Annual Report

Australia Treasury Annual Report

Melbourne City Annual Report

Australia Government - Department of Finance and De-regulation

Australia Future Funds ($100 billion) and “Nation Building Fund”

Government of Canada (Annual Financial Report)

Montreal, Canada (Annual Financial Report)

Ireland National Pension Reserve Fund scheme

Belfast City Council Annual Financial Report

The British Monarchy

City of London Police Department

Welsh Government

Japan Finance Corporation

What Are CAFRs?

First, what is a CAFR? A CAFR (Comprehensive Annual Financial Report) is government's complete accounting of "Net Worth".

It has been reported that trillions of collective dollars not shown in government Budget reports are shown through Government CAFR reports and they are virtually never openly-discussed by the syndicated NEWS media, both the Democratic and Republican Party members, the House, Senate, and organized public education.

With, and being that the CAFR is "the" accounting document for every local government, and with it being effectively "BLACKED OUT" for open mention over the last 60 years, that this fact of intentional omission of coverage is the biggest conspiracy that has ever taken effect in the United States. Read more at: Rense

As more and more cities, counties, districts, and states across America falsely declare their near - insolubility, bankruptcy warnings, fiscal deficits, and budgetary quandaries, I am left with the sinking feeling that “the people” just can’t wrap their heads around how to point out these misleading and downright fallacious claims made by their councils, mayors, and professional con-men in places of public trust.

So today I want to share with you a simple way to factually stand before your local or state political “leaders” and give indisputable proof that, when stating the “facts” about their own budget shortfalls, limited choices, and necessary raising of your hard-earned monies as taxation (revenue) to “balance the budget”, your own little criminal syndicate of elected mayors and council men and women are lying bold-faced to the entire citizenry through the act of subterfuge and omission.

This little factoid is uniform throughout the entirety of the financial structure of government, as reported in the audited Comprehensive Annual Financial Report and required by Federal and State laws. It is always reported in the same fashion and under the same heading as all other governments (municipal corporations).

The figures are not disputable. The truth is unshakable. And yet the doublespeak will never end… For even as you present this one simple line item to the scoundrels themselves behind their raised and protective pedestals, they will still attempt to deny what is undeniable, be it in ignorance or in deceit; usually a mix of both.

Read the full story at: RealityBlogger




Update: How The New Zealand [And Other Western Countries] Government Hides Billions (Trillions) In Slush Funds
October 9 2014 | From Narkive


C.A.F.R. (Comprehensive Annual Financial Report) Hidden / Stolen 'Cream' - Trillions In Surplus


Globally, The Biggest Financial Scandal In History / Annals Of Mankind

Playing in the derivitives market John Key was selected to become NZ PM / US Federal Reserve Bank / Israeli operative

Billions (Trillions) in profitable investments

Convincing you that the government is financially in trouble when the government has trillions of dollars in slush funds

Budget reports: Only need to show what is necessary to meet obligations

Transactions for local governments are missing

Total investment revenue is missing

Total income figures are missing

Total worth is missing

Surplus cream ($) is not mentioned [exposure of manufactured debt = loss of control]

United Nations (1946) created CAFR to take over and steal wealth

Only shows shortfall of budgetary revenue versus annual operating costs for the year, never shows 'cream'

45% of revenues invested internationally best rate of return

Free trade agreements (NAFTA / GATT / TPPA) ultimate purpose: Governments investing in foreign corporations extending their profits with slaves in China

Government agencies are lying to you when they say there is a need for taxation to pay for services already provided for

The New Zealand people NEVER profit from the investments - massive hidden surpluses

United States Statistics

Local and federal US Government owns approximately 70% of stock market listed companies

70% of Dow Jones (30) owned by composite government funds

Prison industry (Correctional Corporation of America) is the #1 industry in America. New Zealand Prime Minister John Key moves towards that end in New Zealand

US Federal $30 Trillion cream at top not reported


Total non-signatory to the 1740 Waitangi Treaty (with amusing numerous versions), this Tainui Kiingitanga warrior demands from the New Zealand government [the following]:

1. What Is The Total Cash Gross Receipts Income ?

2. What Are The Total Investments ?

3. What Is The Net Worth ?

4. What Is The Investment Growth ? 5, 10, 25 Years In The Future ?

5. What Are The Liquid Assets ? (Billions / Trillions)

We Know Know That The Constant Cries For More Taxation Are Entirely Bogus:

New Zealand CAFR (Comprehensive Annual Financial Report) where literally hundreds of Billions of dollars are hidden or not listed / discussed by the same banker controlled media.

Not Readily Listed:

Taxation and selling of government assets is the massive conspiracy, when the hidden surplus of Trillions of dollars
is not discussed by the bankers and government controlled media.

New Zealand Member Of Parliament Is Concerned The Reserve Bank Of New Zealand Is Overseas-Owned
July 22 2014 | From: NZNewswire / Yahoo

NZ First leader Winston Peters is trying to laugh off a 'serious misconception' held by one of his MPs

See also: International Ownership of New Zealand Banks - Who Owns New Zealand's Banks?

Asenati Lole-Taylor said in a Facebook post on Tuesday she was concerned about 90 per cent of New Zealand's banks being foreign-owned.

"Especially the Reserve Bank," she said.

Questioned about this by another Facebook user, who said the Reserve Bank was owned by the government, Ms Lole-Taylor responded:

"No, it's not. Our Reserve Bank is run by overseas bankers."

Mr Peters told reporters he didn't consider her comments were "strictly accurate" and veered off into criticism of the profits New Zealand's banks make.

"And who owns the US Federal Bank, you don't know, do you," he said before walking off.

Comment: Thanks Winston - Have you just confirmed without a doubt that you are bought and paid for?

See also: International Ownership of New Zealand Banks - Who Owns New Zealand's Banks?

TPP Risks A Weaker Global Trading System, Says Ex-World Trade Organisation Head
July 21 2014 | From: NationalBusinessReview

Comment: Why is the head of the WTO now making such comments about the TPP Agreement?

Also, it is interesting to note that Mike Moore (a politician from New Zealand) has also served both as Prime Minister of New Zealand and Director-General of the World Trade Organization. He is the current New Zealand Ambassador to the United States.

The World Trade Organisation, along with the World Bank and the the International Monetary Fund and the Bank for International Settlements, forcibly integrate minor countries of the world into the globalist NWO cabal system.

Also see: The Truth About Free Trade and Free Trade Agreements

The Trans-Pacific Partnership is a step backwards to the days before the World Trade Organisation when the the US and Europe controlled the global trading system to the detriment of developing economies, says a former director-general of the WTO, Supachai Panitchpakdi of Thailand.

In New Zealand for a meeting of the honorary advisers to the Asia-New Zealand Foundation, Supachai told BusinessDesk in an interview that Asian economies had more to gain by pursuing the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP), which includes China and India but not the US, than TPP, which he described as a "US-centric" trade deal.

New Zealand is one of three countries that initiated the TPP concept and has committed substantial resources to its negotiation, but it only gained momentum once the US became a member of the 12-country grouping seeking a new set of trade rules for an Asia-Pacific trade bloc.

The US and Europe are also negotiating a TPP-style deal, known as TTIP (Trans-Atlantic Trade and Investment Partnership).

"TTIP amd TTP together could drive the world back into the old days before the WTO was conceived, a world trading system predominated by major trading nations, which was something I thought we tried to adjust with the more democratic participation of membership of the WTO," - said Supachai, who was director-general of the WTO from 2002 to 2005, immediately after former New Zealand prime minister Mike Moore.

New Zealand belongs to both TPP and RCEP, which was initiated in 2012, and is part of the four year-old Association of South-East Asian Nations Free Trade Area (AFTA), most of whose members are involved in both TTP and RCEP.

"For me, the priority should be for Asia to move in the direction of RCEP," said Supachai. "If there should be a need for the US to join in or others, it should be in the context of RCEP."

As secretary-general of the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) between 2005 and 2013, Supachai also oversaw analysis of the North American Free Trade Agreement, which found that Mexico had done poorly from the deal while the developed economies in NAFTA - the US and Canada - had benefited.

"At UNCTAD, we pointed out that for a developing country that joins a regional agreement with major, much more advanced economies, they are not easily going to gain much."

That risk existed with TPP, which would be "mainly driven by the major players of the world trade system to set up very forward-looking, very avant garde" rules in areas that less developed economies would struggle to accommodate. These included intellectual property restrictions that could thwart the availability of affordable universal healthcare and rules requiring privatisation of state-owned enterprises with certain timeframes.

TPP negotiations have stalled for more than a year on such sticking points.

"TPP is US-centric," said Supachai. "It leaves the question as to what would the rest of the membership of the TPP be able to contribute fairly to the outcome? My general basic principle on the two so-called mega-deals (TPP and TTIP) is that we have to be a bit cautious about the way we are practicing regionalism these days. I'm open-minded, but regionalism should ultimately prove to strengthen the multi-lateral processes."

Regional trade deals have become increasingly commonly pursued as the global process overseen by the WTO has failed over the last 13 years of the so-called "Doha Round" negotiations to produce a new global trade agreement.

The RCEP initiative was better suited to bolstering Asian economies' growing role in the world economy, said Supachai.

"RCEP is more ASEAN-centric and, for better or worse, ASEAN has a good record of expanding trade. Intra-ASEAN trade is now 53 to 54 percent," he said. "This is only lower than Europe, which is 70 to 80 percent." New trade agreements needed to be favourable to Asia if only because of the region's status as a "global public good." We are the ones now generating more than half of world growth and 67 percent of world trade and the area has been excessively accumulating financial reserves," said Supachai. "That's why RCEP is important. TPP comes in between."

Most people have never heard of Jaime Caruana even though he is the head of an immensely powerful organization. He has been serving as the General Manager of the Bank for International Settlements since 2009, and he will continue in that role until 2017





The Bank for International Settlements is a rather boring name, and very few people realize that it is at the very core of our centrally-planned global financial system. So when Jaime Caruana speaks, people should listen.

And the fact that he recently warned that the global financial system is currently “more fragile” in many ways than it was just prior to the collapse of Lehman Brothers should set off all sorts of alarm bells.

Speaking of the financial markets, Caruana ominously declared that “it is hard to avoid the sense of a puzzling disconnect between the markets’ buoyancy and underlying economic developments globally” and he noted that “markets can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent”.

In other words, he is saying what I have been saying for so long. The behavior of the financial markets has become completely divorced from economic reality, and at some point there is going to be a massive correction.

So why would the head of ‘the central bank of the world’ choose this moment to issue such a chilling warning?

Does he know something that the rest of us do not?

[ New Zealand Definitely Has Zombie Economists ]

"It’s horrible to say but yes we have zombie towns and some of them do have to close. And you know it’s going to be devastating for those communities but it will be better for New Zealand if we target our resources in places that have some hope of growing and creating prosperity."





Excerpt: Lisa Owen interviews NZIER principal economist Shamubeel Eaqub about his new book Growing Apart

Lisa Owen: Your book points out there is this huge range of incomes from region to region and you compare some of them to overseas countries, some have the dubious honour of being compared to Greece. Talk me through some of those examples.

Shamubeel Eaqub: Yeah I think in a way we have so much conversation in New Zealand about New Zealand but when you scratch beneath the surface we’re really different. Places like Northland look more like Timor and if we look at places like Orakei in Auckland it’s more like Switzerland, incredibly rich. And those divergences are not new but the gaps are growing.

It’s horrible to say but yes we have zombie towns and some of them do have to close. And you know it’s going to be devastating for those communities but it will be better for New Zealand if we target our resources in places that have some hope of growing and creating prosperity.

Read the full interview at: NationalBusinessReview

This is by the far the most important interview to watch BEFORE the New Zealand election.
The truth about New Zealand's Prime Minister John Key will make your draw drop.





In 1995 John Key became Merrill Lynch's Head of Asian foreign exchange in Singapore, where later in that same year he was promoted to the Head of Foreign Exchange of Merrill Lynch Global in London.

He was also Head of Bonds and Derivatives, Merill Lynch (around 2001 - according to his own website).

Key was a Member of the Foreign Exchange Committee of the New York Federal Reserve Bank from 1999 to 2001.

Membership is by appointment only.

Or: How The Rothschild-Controlled Reserve Bank Of New Zealand Announces Plans To Update Now Worthless Fiat Currency Debt Note Currency Designs

If you haven't done your homework already and do not realise that we are encumbered and enslaved within a criminal banking system run by a private central banking framework then woe be to you.

The rest of this article is directly from the "banks" mouth. Most of the staff at the RBNZ are not even aware enough to register the globalist directives that flow through their superiors.

There are not many wake-up-call opportunities left.

New Banknotes Next Step In NZ Currency Evolution

A speech delivered to the Royal Numismatic Society in Wellington

New Zealand’s currency will take another significant evolutionary step next year when modernised banknotes with more advanced security features are introduced, Reserve Bank Deputy Governor Geoff Bascand said in a speech today.

In a speech titled The evolution of New Zealand’s currency, Mr Bascand said the Reserve Bank is committed to meeting New Zealand’s future currency needs.

“While other means of payment keep growing, cash remains in strong demand, and we need to keep it current and viable for its users.”

“Security features and the technology for designing and printing banknotes have advanced considerably since the current banknote series was first issued in the early 1990s. While counterfeiting rates in New Zealand are low compared to the rest of the world, we need to stay one step ahead of the game.”

Mr Bascand said the Reserve Bank’s project to upgrade and improve the security of New Zealand’s banknotes is progressing well, and Canadian Bank Note Company (CBNC) has been selected to design and print New Zealand’s next series of banknotes.

“CBNC has a strong reputation for technologically advanced printing, and the Bank has confidence that it will deliver high quality banknotes which New Zealanders can continue to identify with and trust. CBNC currently manufactures New Zealand’s passports and prints the Bank of Canada’s banknotes,” Mr Bascand said.

The new banknotes will be the same size and denominations as the current series, and will continue to be made of a flexible polymer plastic. While the designs will be updated, the themes of the notes will remain the same, with the same New Zealanders, flora and fauna remaining central to the designs. The Bank expects to publicly release the ‘near final’ banknote designs in November, after they have been thoroughly tested.

Subject to successful testing, the new notes will be progressively released by denomination, likely starting in the fourth quarter of 2015. The new notes will co-circulate with the current notes for a period of time. Both the current series and new notes will be legal tender.
“The Reserve Bank will continue consultation with banknote equipment manufacturers and industry stakeholders in the lead-up to the release of the new notes, to ensure a smooth transition.”

Mr Bascand says the Bank is also evaluating new minting technologies which could allow coloured circulating coins, and is working with New Zealand Post to develop opportunities to mark next year’s Gallipoli centenary.

“Innovation is central to the New Zealand culture and important to the Reserve Bank. With this in mind, we will find new ways to celebrate New Zealand in our currency while preserving the core integrity, functionality and confidence in the product.”

House Speaker John Boehner will file a lawsuit against the Obama administration for its use of executive actions to change laws, he formally announced Wednesday.





House Speaker John Boehner will file a lawsuit against the Obama administration for its use of executive actions to change laws, he formally announced Wednesday.

"I believe the President is not faithfully executing the laws of our country, and on behalf of the institution and our constitution standing up and fighting for this is in the best long term interest of the Congress," he said.

Boehner would not say which executive action the lawsuit would target specifically.

The specifics and mechanics of the suit have yet to be worked out, but Boehner could enlist an organization called the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group (BLAG) to carry it out.


Because that body is controlled by the Speaker, the Majority Leader, the Majority Whip, the Minority Leader and the Minority Whip, Republicans could order the lawsuit to go ahead even if Democrats objected.

The speaker insisted Wednesday that the lawsuit does not amount to an effort to impeach the president.

"This is not about impeachment, this is about his faithfully executing the laws of our country," Boehner said.

White House press secretary Josh Earnest said he is confident the president has operated well within the confines of the law and that Republicans have brought the suit simply because they disagree with Obama's policies.

The GOP's unwillingness to compromise has forced the president to take more executive actions, Earnest said.

"The fact that they are considering a taxpayer-funded lawsuit against the president of the United States for doing his job, I think, is the kind of step that most Americans wouldn't support," Earnest said. "This lawsuit is not going to consume the attention of the White House," he added. House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., on Wednesday called the lawsuit "subterfuge." "They're doing nothing here and so they have to give some aura of activity," she said. - NBC's Andrew Rafferty and Carrie Dann contributed to this report.

Barclays accused of deceiving investors

Comment: Astute obervers will note that as part of the ongoing struggle-for-dominance infighting within the cabal, the loosely describable 'UK and US' factions are taking pot-shots at one another. Another example has just emerged:

A fraud lawsuit against Barclays in the United States has been filed by the New York attorney general.

The lawsuit alleges that the bank falsified documents and misrepresented systems in place to protect certain investors from aggressive trading.

It relates to the bank's "dark pool" trading operations, which allow clients to trade large blocks of shares while keeping prices more private.

Barclays said it was taking the allegations "very seriously".

Prosecutors said Barclays misrepresented the kinds of investors that were using the dark pool.


'Full of predators'

New York attorney general Eric Schneiderman said: "The facts alleged in our complaint show that Barclays demonstrated a disturbing disregard for its investors in a systematic pattern of fraud and deceit."

"Barclays grew its dark pool by telling investors they were diving into safe waters. According to the lawsuit, Barclays' dark pool was full of predators - there at Barclays' invitation," he said.


Analysis

Samira Hussain, BBC business reporter, New York:

“Dark pools are under the spotlight. There are at least 40 operating in the US where they compete against traditional exchanges. But these private platforms operate outside the public eye. And that's becoming a big issue, especially in this post-recession era, when banks have been blamed for a crippling financial crisis. Regulators are taking a much closer look at everything banks do, especially things that can so easily fall under the radar. The lawsuit said that Barclay's marketing material was misleading over the extent of high-frequency trading in its dark pool. High-frequency traders use fast, sophisticated trading software and can make large profits on very small moves in share prices. The lawsuit accused Barclays of telling investors trading was being closely monitored and "predatory" traders would be held accountable."

'Inside help'

But in fact Barclays did not prohibit a single trader from operating in its dark pool, the lawsuit said.

In addition, the lawsuit alleges that Barclays operated its dark pool to favour high-frequency traders and "actively sought to attract them".

In a statement the bank said: "Barclays has been cooperating with the New York attorney general and the SEC and has been examining this matter internally. The integrity of the markets is a top priority of Barclays."

The attorney general said that the investigation had been significantly helped by a number of former Barclays' employees.


Other investigations

Barclays has been the subject of several investigations, fines and settlements in recent years.

In May it was fined £26m by UK regulators after one of its traders was discovered attempting to fix the price of gold.

In April, Barclays agreed to a $280m (£167m) settlement with the US Federal Housing and Finance Authority (FHFA).

The agreement settles claims by the FHFA that Barclays misled US mortgage lenders Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac during the housing crisis.

In 2012 it was fined £290m by UK regulators for attempting to manipulate an important lending rate, known as Libor.

Comment: The Cabal have made a successful job of manufacturing fake debts that are completely unaddressable - just what they wanted. This typically starts with IMF / World Bank loans which require asset sales as part of the deal. Sound familiar?

This is what happens when a country take out loans that are structured such as they can never be repaid and run a privately owned reserve banking system with no backing - and create fiat money out of thin air. Much has been written on this matter - such as this and this for example. Does anyone stop to think just to whom / what all this debt is owed?





America - its government, businesses, and people - are nearly $60 trillion in debt, according to the latest economic data from thethe St. Louis Federal Reserve. And private debt - not government borrowing - is the biggest reason for the huge deficit.

Total US debt at the end of the first quarter of 2014, on March 31 totaled almost $59.4 trillion - up nearly $500 billion from the end of the fourth quarter of 2013, according to the data. Total debt (the combination of government, business, mortgage, and consumer debt) was $2.2 trillion 40 years ago.

“In 50 short years, debt has gone from being a luxury for a few to a convenience for many to an addiction for most to a disease for all,” James Butler wrote in an Independent Voters Network (IVN) op-ed. “It is a virus that has spread to every aspect of our economy, from a consumer using a credit card to buy a $0.75 candy bar in a vending machine to a government borrowing $17 trillion to keep the lights on.”

Read the full story at: RT

The UK filed its first criminal proceedings against scandal-struck US-based Libor traders on Monday over the alleged rigging of global benchmark interest rates. Three former Barclays traders are to be charged, according to the UK’s Serious Fraud Office.

Jay Vijay Merchant, Alex Julian Pabon and Ryan Michael Reich are the three former New-York based Barclays employees who have been charged by the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) with conspiracy to defraud.

“He is not guilty of this offense and will vigorously contest these allegations at his forthcoming trial,” British law firm Hickman & Rose, which is representing Reich, said in a statement. The lawyers for the remaining two men were not available for comment, reported Reuters.

While the SFO confirmed that the trio are in the US, they are due to appear at Westminster Magistrates Court in London on May 27. The occasion could set the ball rolling for the first extradition to the UK from the US in what has been a lengthy investigation into Libor (London interbank offered rate) manipulation.

The Libor scandal dates back to 2005. Libor is the average interest rate that underpins trillions of dollars worth of loans, contracts and mortgages through the interest rates of major London banks. The scandal drew in some of the world’s biggest financial institutions, including the Royal Bank of Scotland, UBS, and Barclays.

Barclays was the first bank to settle in the wake of the rate manipulation accusations, paying some $450 million in fines in 2012 after admitting misconduct.

The subsequent backlash forced out four top Barclays directors, including chief executive Bob Diamond in 2012, who had previously insisted that he would not resign.

So far, US and European authorities have fined 10 banks and brokerages a total of $6 billion.

Twelve people are now facing criminal charges in the US and UK, among them the three from Barclays for the manipulation of denominated Libor. Twenty-two potential co-conspirators have also been identified, but not publicly named.

The charges fall at a time when a parallel investigation is underway into foreign exchange market rigging. On March 5, the Bank of England was forced to suspend a member of staff.

A Brief 100 Year History Of 9/11 And The Jekyll Island Banks
April 25 2014 | From: PeterDrew

Currently our 9/11 group here in the UK are working on a major project to have true 9/11 evidence presented to university students of political studies at major universities across the UK. While the evidence about 9/11 that will hopefully be presented will be focussed on the controlled demolition of the three towers, a big focus of the presentations will also be to initially give the students a much broader understanding of the historical context of 9/11 so that they can better understand the evidence they are seeing.

Many people really struggle to take on board the evidence of 9/11 because they are looking at 9/11 in isolation rather than as just one part of a very big story. When they can see where 9/11 fits as part of the big picture, and they can see the repeating pattern of false flag attacks throughout history by the same power structures, then they will hopefully be better able to comprehend the evidence about 9/11 that is being presented.

This is the intention of the following 100 year historical timeline for 9/11. For the purposes of our university presentations, this time-line is currently being made into a 12 minute mini documentary, however this written document can hopefully serve as a useful document for all newcomers to the subject of 9/11, the global banking cartel, the Military Industrial Complex, and the New World Order.

By Peter Drew – MSc, Independent Journalist

False Flag Attack – an act of terrorism or military aggression organised and perpetrated against one’s self and then blamed on the enemy in order to justify taking certain desired actions against that enemy




Mayer Amschel Rothschild (1744-1812) – founder of the House of Rothschild banking dynasty - “Let me issue and control a nation’s money and I care not who writes the laws.”

The following is a 100 year time-line of key events in history which paint a much broader history and context of the events of 9/11. As demonstrated in this time-line, 9/11 was just one piece of a very large and lengthy jig-saw puzzle, albeit an extremely important piece. It also demonstrates a much clearer rationale for why experts from all over the world are claiming that the true events of 9/11 are very different from what we have been told by our government officials and by our media.

Enormous amounts of irrefutable scientific evidence and eye-witness accounts have now proved beyond all reasonable doubt that the official story of 9/11 is completely false. The evidence instead strongly suggests that the real perpetrators of 9/11 were in fact rogue elements of the US government and the ‘Military Industrial Complex’, as part of an extremely powerful and controlling global banking cartel, both inside and outside the US, and that 9/11 was in fact the largest False Flag attack in history. This time-line provides the broader context for demonstrating this claim.

Note: The historical points below can all be officially verified, however there are several points where a personal interpretation of a confirmed event has been made based on extensive research.




'The Clubhouse' on Jekyll Island, Georgia, USA. Birthplace of the United States Federal Reserve System

1910 - Top secret meeting of the most powerful global bankers at Jekyll Island, Georgia, led by the Rothschild and Rockefeller banking dynasties. There they hatch a grand, long term plan to take control of the world through totally controlling the world’s finances. Three key strategies for achieving this grand plan include; 1) manipulating the formation of central banks which appear to the public to be federal/national banks, but are actually under their private control, 2) continually creating wars through false flag attacks and then funding and supporting both sides of these wars for direct profit from the war machine via the ‘Military Industrial Complex’ (war is extremely profitable), and also for strategic geopolitical purposes, and 3) controlling what the public thinks by owning and controlling the media

1913 - The Jekyll Island bankers con US President Woodrow Wilson and US Congress into agreeing to the formation of the US Federal Reserve Bank, a privately owned bank, owned and run by the Jekyll Island bankers, including JP Morgan, which can print its own money out of thin air and then lend it to the US government at interest

1914 - The Jekyll Island banks secretly fund both sides of WW1

1917 - President Wilson admits that he has made a huge error by creating the Federal Reserve Bank and that he has destroyed the future of the US; “I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated”




It is not widely known that the famous cartoon banker of the 'Monopoly' board game was based upon John Peirpont "J.P." Morgan himself.


1917 - JP Morgan conducts a research project to look into how much of the media would need to be bought and controlled in order to control what the public thinks. JP Morgan then buys up that amount of the US media (the top 25 newspapers). The Jekyll Island banks continue to buy up more and more of the media over the next 90 years until 95% of today’s mainstream media is owned and controlled by just 6 mega corporations (GE, News-Corp, Viacom, Disney, Warner, CBS), which are ultimately all owned by the Jekyll Island banks

1929 - Bursting of the first big financial bubble created artificially and intentionally by the Federal Reserve Bank

1933 - The Reichstag false flag incident is used to promote the rise of the Nazi Party and to create the political tensions with the Soviet Union which eventually lead to WW2

1939 - The Jekyll Island banks, including Prescott Bush (George Bush Senior’s father), fund both sides of WW2. Bush’s involvement in this is discovered by US authorities and his company’s assets are stripped from him for ‘trading with the enemy’

1941 - The US military, desperate to get into WW2, waves the red flag at Japan and then allows Pearl Harbour to occur in order to justify entry to WW2




Operation Paperclip essentially served as a German / Nazi technology transfer programme


1945 – ‘Operation Paperclip’ secretly moves hundreds of Nazi Secret Service Officers and scientists to the US

1947 - Under the guidance of the Nazi SS Officers, the CIA (Central Intelligence Agency) is formed to gather global intelligence about the Soviet Union and the Cold War. This is the birth of the modern day 'Military Industrial Complex' and the shadow government controlled by the Jekyll Island banks

1949 – NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organisation) is created. On the back of NATO, the new CIA organisation, guided by the Nazi SS Officers, begins the highly covert and highly illegal implementation of ‘Operation Gladio’ whereby the CIA covertly engages with and supports right wing extremist groups to conduct false flag attacks and create internal social-political unrest in targeted nations in order to facilitate government regime change. This regime change is invariably followed by the insertion of a government that is compliant with the establishment of a ‘central/national bank’ owned and controlled by the Jekyll Island banks. Various high level testimonies in the early 1990’s have now confirmed the existence and activities of Operation Gladio. Operation Gladio is still in full swing today by the CIA, with recent high profile examples being Libya (2011), Syria (2011), Venezuela (2013), and Ukraine (2014). Nearly all nations now have a central/national bank that is actually owned by the Jekyll Island banking cartel

1960 - In his farewell speech, President Eisenhower warns the world, and incoming President Kennedy, about the dangerous and uncontrolled rise of power of the 'Military Industrial Complex' (all linked to the covert and illegal CIA operations and the shadow government/Jekyll Island banks)




JFK: Taken out for trying to end the Federal Reserve amongst other matters


1961 - President Kennedy makes a passionate speech to the world warning them of the rise of power and the covert influence of the Military Industrial Complex, the shadow government, and secret societies. In that speech he pleads with the media to do their job of informing the people of the truth (rather than just obeying the shadow government/Jekyll Island banks and being the propaganda arm of this now extremely powerful cartel)

1962 - President Kennedy rejects the 'Operation Northwoods' proposal for the CIA to implement a major false flag terrorist attack against US citizens to justify war with Cuba. The plan recommended hijackings and bombings of US citizens, followed by the introduction of phony evidence that would implicate the Cuban government. The Operation Northwoods proposal was openly confirmed in 1998 with the release of the official documents from the National Security Archive

June 1963 - President Kennedy begins moves to try to shut down the rising power and influence of the Military Industrial Complex and the shadow government/Jekyll Island banks by moving to shut down the Federal Reserve Bank and the CIA

November 1963 - President Kennedy is assassinated. There is overwhelming evidence of a conspiracy, with much evidence pointing towards CIA involvement. This evidence is covered up through the Warren Commission investigation and through classification of a huge number of documents relating to this. These documents were due to be de-classified in 2014, however President Obama deemed that their declassification would jeopardise National Security, so he had the documents classified for a further 70 years

November 1963 - Lyndon Johnson takes over as President and immediately reverses everything that Kennedy was doing to shut down the shadow government/Jekyll Island banks, and instead he hugely increases the push for war with Vietnam which Kennedy was rejecting

1964 – The Gulf of Tonkin false flag incident is used to justify war with Vietnam

1968 - Bobby Kennedy runs for President and says that if he becomes President he is going to find out who killed his brother

1968 - Bobby Kennedy is assassinated

1970s, 80s - The rise of the global resource war for oil

1976 - George Bush Senior becomes the Head of the CIA

1988 – George Bush Senior becomes US President

1989 – Plans are made by the City of New York and the Port Authority to completely dismantle the World Trade Centre towers. These plans were initiated because of the huge problem of asbestos throughout the buildings. Over the next decade these plans were repeatedly thwarted and eventually dropped because the WTC towers were considered prohibitively expensive to dismantle safely (many billions of dollars)

1989 - The Berlin Wall falls and the Cold War ends. The US now needs a new enemy to keep feeding the Military Industrial Complex war machine/profit generator

1990 – George Bush Senior launches the Gulf War as a first attempt to take greater control of the Middle East





1991 - George Bush Senior tells the world that there needs to be a 'New World Order'

1997 – PNAC (Project for a New American Century) is founded. PNAC’s stated goal is to ‘Promote American global leadership’ (clearly linked to George Bush Senior’s call for a ‘New World Order’). Key members of PNAC include Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld





2000 - George Bush Junior steals the US election

2000 – A detailed report by PNAC states that the US needs to take control of 7 specific countries in the Middle East, but that this will be a very long and slow process unless there was a 'catastrophic and catalysing event…….like a new Pearl Harbour' to make the public more accepting of large scale war in the Middle East

January 2001 – Extensive work begins throughout the World Trade Centre towers by ACE Elevators, a newly formed elevator renovation company (experts in controlled demolition have since stated that if the World Trade Centre towers were to be brought down by controlled demolition, it would require access to the elevator shafts in order to plant the explosives in the required positions throughout the internal infrastructure of the towers)

June 2001 - Donald Rumsfeld changes the US air defence procedures so that no airliner can be shot down unless he specifically gives the order (previously this decision could be made by the Air Force if the situation required). Shortly after 9/11, this policy reverts back to how it was originally

July 2001 - Larry Silverstein is given the lease on all seven of the World Trade Centre towers and then takes out a massive insurance policy on them against total destruction from an act of terrorism

June-Sept 2001 - The CIA, Condoleeza Rice, and Donald Rumsfeld receive warnings from all directions from home and around the world that a major terrorist attack is imminent on US soil. This includes knowledge that several of the alleged 9/11 hijackers are currently in the US and planning something big. The FBI attempts to get information from the CIA on the whereabouts of the alleged hijackers to make arrests but are prevented from doing so by the CIA (this is later publicly confirmed by Richard Clarke, the Head of US Counter Terrorism at the time)





Sept 10th, 2001 - Donald Rumsfeld holds a press conference to inform the public that $2.3 trillion has gone missing from the Pentagon budget

Sept 11th, 2001 - PNAC gets their 'new Pearl Harbour'. The 9/11 attacks also totally destroy the area of the Pentagon where the investigation into the missing $2.3 trillion was being conducted. As the 9/11 attacks are underway, Donald Rumsfeld cannot be located or contacted as military personnel track the unidentified aircraft heading towards the Pentagon, and Dick Cheney maintains the ‘stand down order’ for shooting down airliners despite being questioned on it as the unidentified aircraft approaches the Pentagon. US Secretary of Transport, Norman Mineta, later testifies under oath to confirm this fact, but his testimony is completely stricken from the 9/11 investigation (but is still available to see on YouTube)

Sept 12th, 2001 - Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaeda are immediately 'confirmed' as the perpetrators of 9/11

Sept 21, 2001 – While visiting the Pentagon, Four Star General Wesley Clarke discovers, and later tells the world, that in response to 9/11 there are plans to overthrow 7 specific Middle East countries in the next 5 years. These 7 countries are the exact same countries as previously listed in PNAC’s report in 2000

Sept 28, 2001 - Osama bin Laden is interviewed by the Karachi, Pakistan, daily newspaper Ummat and denies any involvement in 9/11. The entire Western media, controlled by the Jekyll Island banks, refuses to show this interview and instead they show an alternative interview of a man alleged to be Osama Bin Laden admitting to the 9/11 attacks, but which is later exposed to be a crude fake

October 2001 - The Patriot Act is passed which effectively destroys the US Constitution and gives the US government, which is now very much controlled by the Military Industrial Complex/Jekyll Island banks, the legal right to do virtually anything they want to do, all in the name of national security. This effectively turns the US into a Police State overnight and strips the US public of their 200 year old constitutional rights created by the Founding Fathers

2002 to 2014 - $4 trillion dollars is spent on the 'war on terror'. Much of this astronomical amount of money goes to the Military Industrial Complex/Jekyll Island Banks, and over 1 million innocent lives are lost. 5 of the 7 countries listed in the 2000 PNAC report have major incidents of 'regime change' (several of them driven by Operation Gladio), and the other 2 countries are currently a work in progress (Syria and Iran)




Larry Silverstein’ bought the World Trade Center just months before 9/11 - the $6 Billion insurance plan happened to cover terrorist attacks “by chance”


2007 – Larry Silverstein wins his legal case with his insurance firm and receives payment of $4.55 billion for the total destruction of the WCT towers by act of terrorism. The very expensive asbestos problem had miraculously become a massive financial windfall for Larry instead

2011 – The Swiss Federal Institute of Technology conducts a substantial research project which demonstrates that there is a massive global network of interconnected corporations controlled by just 147 giant trans-national corporations. The study confirms that these 147 trans-national corporations now control 80% of the world’s finances, and they all converge into a small handful of the most powerful global banks, including………the Jekyll Island banks

And so, the grand, long term plan of the Jekyll Island banks hatched back in 1910 is nearing completion just over 100 years later, and President Woodrow Wilson’s dire prophecy in 1917 has come to total fruition.

The events of 9/11 have been a vital part of consolidating the more recent stages of that grand plan.

The Physical Evidence for 9/11 being a False Flag Attack

The time-line above is a compelling demonstration of the systems and context for 9/11 being a massive False Flag attack. In addition to this, the physical evidence to support this claim and eye-witness accounts from the first responder fire fighters is absolutely overwhelming.

In particular the evidence is overwhelming that the Twin Towers and the third tower to collapse, WTC Building 7, were brought down through controlled demolition rather than from fires from the crashed airliners as the official story of 9/11 has told us. As a starting point for looking into the evidence for this, below are just a few very useful references:

1. The Creature from Jekyll Island – best-selling book by G. Edward Griffin

2. The New Pearl Harbor: Disturbing Questions About the Bush Administration and 9/11 – book by David Ray Griffin

3. 9/11: Explosive Evidence – The Experts Speak Out – documentary

4. Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth – www.ae911truth.org

5. 9/11 Synthetic Terror – book by Webster Tarpley

6. Towers of Deception: The media cover-up of 9/11 – book by Barrie Zwicker

7. Loose Change – documentary

How do the Jekyll Island Banks get together to make their grand plans?

For information on how the Military Industrial Complex/Jekyll Island Banking Cartel conduct planning sessions for their global plans and policies, research can be focussed on some of the following organisations which were previously unknown to almost everyone, but are now increasingly having the light shone onto them by a much more aware public;

1) Bilderberg Group

2) Trilateral Commission

3) Council on Foreign Relations

4) Club of Rome

The Bilderberg Group is a particularly good example. This group, made up of the most influential financiers and political figures in the world, gathers for three days every year at what is supposed to be a top secret location. Only as recently as the late 990’s, the mainstream media was flatly denying the existence of this group and labelling anyone making this claim as crazy. However, with the rise of the internet, over the last decade the public awareness of the Bilderberg Group has grown exponentially every year. At the 2013 Bilderberg meeting in Hertfordshire, UK, the public crowds that gathered outside the Bilderberg meeting venue were so large (many thousands) that a large percentage of the Hertfordshire Police Force had to be called up to try to maintain crowd control. Not only did this force the mainstream media to cover a Bilderberg meeting for the first time ever, it also forced the existence of the Bilderberg Group to be formally raised and discussed in British Parliament for the first time ever.

Concluding Comments

9/11 has directly led to the death of more than one million innocent lives so far, including thousands of US military officers and hundreds of UK military officers. Indirect deaths will become tens of millions, or more, through the widespread use of depleted uranium weapons which have effectively nuked Iraq , Libya, and other nations .

22 US military officers now commit suicide every day due to the horrific war crimes they have been asked to commit on behalf of the Jekyll Island banking cartel/Military Industrial Complex.

The disparity between the richest 1% and the rest of the population is now the greatest it has ever been in history
Nations all over the world are currently in a state of national debt crisis that is mathematically impossible for them to escape from, and as a consequence they are suffering from brutal austerity measures that are being dictated to governments by the same banks who hold their debt. See Greece, Spain, Portugal and numerous others.

The majority of the debt incurred by these nations has been created by central/national banks which are actually privately owned banks (owned by the Jekyll Island banking cartel). Those privately owned banks have the right to print their own money out of thin air and then lend it to the government of that nation and charge them interest. A large portion of your taxes goes to covering the repayment of the interest on those loans to the government. It is that completely fraudulent debt, created by completely fraudulent interest, that is now crippling nations all over the world with brutal austerity measures.

In 2011, the global public began to wake up in mass to the realisation that there is something VERY wrong with the global banking and finance system. The ‘Occupy Wall Street’ protest quickly spread around the world to include 900 different cities as it became the largest and longest running public protest movement in history.

Your taxes are what have funded the contrived ‘global war on terror’, and your taxes are what have funded the murder of the one million+ innocent people who have died on the back of 9/11, as well as the genocidal irradiation of nations. Your taxes are being used for highly illegal and highly immoral purposes. More and more of your money is being continually taken from you through so-called austerity measures in order to fund more and more of this grand theft and genocidal activity. Every banking transaction you make, every pound or dollar that you spend at a large corporate store, and every litre of petrol that you pump into your car helps to fund and maintain this system.

This doesn't have to happen. We don't have to keep supporting this and accepting this.

Our governments, politicians, and controlled media certainly will not be stepping forward to tackle this problem.

ONLY YOU CAN.

Goldman Sachs Plans for the DEPOPULATION of the East Coast of New Zealand for Oil & Gas Drilling by BP, Shell Oil & Todd Energy
Wednesday, 18 April 2012 02:49 | From MediaWhores

Goldman Sachs plans for the depopulation of the East Coast of NZ for oil & gas drilling by BP, Shell Oil & Todd Energy

To check any of these facts- simply Google the names involved- it is all on public record & verifiable.

Goldman Sachs are the bankers for both BP Oil and Royal Dutch Shell- the Global oil company Goliaths owned by our friends - the English & Dutch Royal Families.

Goldman Sachs recently instructed Ironbridge Capital of Australia to purchase Media Works in NZ - the owners of TV3, Radio Live and around 15 other radio stations across NZ - giving Ironbridge, Goldman, BP and Shell Oil a surprisingly tight grip on New Zealand public opinion.

Goldman Sachs are also invested in Kiwirail and various ex Goldman Sachs executives have been placed in management positions throughout their new Kiwirail. Kiwirail have recently announced they don't think it will be 'viable' to rebuild the rail line into the Gisborne area - thus shutting down Gisborne's horticultural industry and further depopulating NZ's East Coast.

Goldman Sachs were mostly responsible for the Finance Collapse of 2008 that wiped out the US middle class, stealing their homes off them and selling enough of that bad debt to the European banks to kick start the continuing Euro Zone collapse.

Goldman Sachs were then bailed out by US Congress and tax payers to the tune of around $10billion dollars, then paying out around $14billion in bonuses to staff the following year. Theft on a grand scale in short - and pushed through by the corrupt US Congress/ House, also in their control.

Goldman Sachs were in control of BP Oil during the Gulf of Mexico oil disaster which decimated that Coast line of the USA. In fact Goldman Sachs sold large chunks of their stock in BP just days before the disaster. Inside information one might say.

Ironbridge Capital, controlled by the criminal Goldman Sachs have just announced they wish to purchase Environwaste in NZ which will then give them control over the movements of any toxic waste from BP, Shell & [the New Zealand Illuminati insider Todd family owned] Todd Energy oil and gas drilling or fracking around the Country.

John Key can also be traced back to Goldman Sachs via Bankers Trust, suggesting he is also heavily invested in Goldman Sachs and their various criminal enterprises and crimes against societies World Wide.

BP, Shell and Todd Energy can be proven to be involved/ behind EVERY oil and gas company with interests in New Zealand - not least of which is TAG Oil who have the rights to drill up the Canterbury basin and whose share price quadrupled on the news of the first ChCh earthquake (Canadian stock exchange). With their extensive criminal history of destroying environments and communities around the Globe (from Angola to Nigeria and even Iraq and now Libya), these three oil and gas Nazi's are very careful to use 'small' third party oil companies that they own anyway, but with different names.

Now please allow Media Whores to join the dots here:

John Key left Merrill Lynch, another well known partner of Goldman Sachs just prior to the US housing market collapse and just in time to come back to New Zealand and suddenly become the leader of the National Party. On being elected, Goldman Sachs (via Ironbridge) raced in to buy up Media Works and take control over 50% of NZ media. They also raced in to buy Kiwirail around the same time - a deal in which John Key is on record lying about his shareholding to the public and then profiting from the deal.

Since these events, we have had 'news' filtered through to us that proven oil,gas and mineral resources around NZ could be worth as much as $4 trillion dollars (Stuff newspaper). Around 30 "fracking licenses" have been issued to oil and gas companies around NZ to allow them to carry out toxic fracking which has been extensively proven World Wide to poison local water supplies and cause earthquakes.

The East Coast of New Zealand has been suffering Earthquakes and 'record' floods ever since (please also refer our article on HAARP - the military 'weather weapon' which targets the jet streams to cause massive floods and is proven to also cause Earthquakes).

After two record floods in the Eastcape / Gisborne areas in the past 6 months, the Goldman Sachs controlled Kiwirail have now announced they will not be able to rebuild the rail line for that area - which will destroy the likes of Watties and other large agricultural businesses in that area, forcing even more people to leave their homes.

Shortly after the Christchurch earthquakes, a massive phosphate find was announced just 450km off the Coast of Christchurch - enough to mine 1 million tonnes of phosphate per annum.

Tag Oil, whose share price rocketed on the news of the Christchurch earthquakes that killed 185 people and destroyed 10,000 homes in the City have since also announced that the entire Eastcoast of NZ could be a find "equal to the size of Texas". In an investor-targeted presentation, TAG Oil has told investors in North America the East Coast is “literally leaking oil and gas”.

The Rena ship was also grounded during these developments, spilling toxic chemicals and trash into the Oceans and right across the Eastcape region, effecting the locals food supply and tourism businesses and further encouraging people to leave the area.

Could it be any clearer Kiwis?

The criminal Goldman Sachs have quite clearly planning and working towards the depopulation of the East Coast of NZ- or anywhere they have found minerals, oil or gas. They have been employing the US military weapon HAARP to cause record flooding in the areas they need to depopulate.

They paid off the captain & or owners of the Rena to go 50 miles off target and wreck the ship where it would cause the most environmental damage possible. They used either HAARP or just underwater explosions to trigger Earthquakes around Canterbury, killing 185 people and depopulating the whole East Coast suburbs of Christchurch.

They purchased our media and all the morons that work for them so as to divert any attention to all these facts and information. They purchased Kiwirail so they could choose which rail lines to keep working and which to close down for the purposes of more depopulation and economic migration away from the areas where the resources lie.

They now want to buy Environwaste so they can smuggle all the toxic waste from fracking & drilling away from public view and try bury it somewhere it can't be monitored/ tracked.

This has all been happening right in front of our faces and could not be any clearer.

John Key was placed here and the media bought to help him get in power. he is heavily invested in Bankers Trust and therfore Goldman Sachs and will be profiting both directly and no doubt indirectly from this massive treasonous attack on NZ and Kiwi's.

The death toll is already rising and will only get worse.

And our prized environment and tourism industries are seriously under threat.

Wake up Kiwis - the Global Banking Cartel and their Oil Companies, on behalf of the English and Dutch Royal Families are actually killing us off and depopulating whole sections of our Country so they can rape our oil and gas.

Rise up Kiwis. Tell your friends. Discuss these facts. Research all the FACTS above using Google and / or Youtube for evidence.

John Key must be put on trial for High Treason and locked up for the rest of his life and the criminals behind this attack on our way of life must be exposed and bannished from ANY further dealings in New Zealand - forever - including Todd Energy and the English Royal Family.

And New Zealanders MUST waking up to the fact that these plans have been in place for many years - 30 years by some estimates, since Muldoon, Think Big and Todd Energy oil / gas discoveries.

Kiwis MUST learn and understand that OUR WHOLE Government is behind this - almost all of our politicians and unless we wipe out our current Government system, Goldman Sachs will simply put Labour or the Greens in charge next and nothing will be done / changed. They will make a lot of noise about John Key and oil drilling so that they are elected, but they will still be in the pockets of the same Nazi / criminal / murderous bankers and politicians and will make sure nothing is really changed and those responsible get away with their crimes- as will they.

This is NOT a democracy and hasn't been for over a generation now.

Rise up and wake up Kiwis!

You are being raped.

US Military Protecting International Banking Cartel
April 9 2014 | From: PressTV

War is extremely profitable for the IBC, since not only do its members profit from financing arms sales to both sides during the conflicts that they themselves often initiate, but also from the post bellum reconstruction. In fact, the most powerful of the central banking institutions in the world, the Bank for International Settlements (BIS), was established in 1930 to oversee reparation payments imposed upon Germany by the Treaty of Versailles that ended the First World War. In addition to providing banking services for central banks worldwide, the BIS supervised the Bretton Woods international currency agreements from the Second World War until the early 1970s, when Nixon reneged on pledges to pay US debt obligations in gold. The BIS also works with the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to expand the IBC-imposed debt-dependency cycle among the nations of the world.

Regarding the insidious US debt-domination process, Wall Street analyst Michael Hudson explains that “by running balance-of-payments deficits that it refuses to settle in gold, it has obliged foreign governments to invest their surplus dollar holdings in Treasury bills, that is, to relend their dollar inflows to the US Treasury.”

The system is somewhat self-perpetuating, for should a non-US central bank decide to divest its dollars, it would effectively sabotage the economy in its own country. Of course, foreign central banks and financial institutions are well aware that by investing in US treasury securities, they will lose money since the Federal Reserve will only turn around and “print” more dollars, thus further diluting the value of their reserves.

However, if these foreign institutions would fail to reinvest their dollars in more T-bills, the rate of depreciation of their dollar holdings would accelerate dramatically. Such awareness holds most governments in check, preventing wholesale dumping of dollars, which of course would bring the entire global system down, along with the IBC.

Hence, demand for US dollars and government and agency bonds continues even as [dollar] value falls. The losses on these holdings represent a tax paid to the ‘Empire',” writes Catherine Austin Fitts, adding, “The fundamental system is as old as the hills. It is based on force.” Conversely, this ability of the IBC to call upon the US military, which incidentally consumes 40 percent of global military spending, whenever and wherever the cartel's interests are threatened, results directly from the global dominance of the dollar. India-based scholar and social activist Rohini Hensm writes, “It is the dominance of the dollar that underpins US financial dominance as a whole as well as the apparently limitless spending power that allows it to keep hundreds of thousands of troops stationed all over the world.”   In short, dollar dominance allows the obscenely profligate spending to maintain the US military's global presence, which in turn insures the continuing hegemony of the dollar.

Nevertheless, an increasing number of challenges to this dollar hegemony regime has arisen, some of which have necessitated suppression by the US military. Iraq is a good case in point. In November of 2000, former Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein announced to the world that Iraq would no longer accept dollars for petroleum transactions.

Despite the declining value of the Euro, Saddam demanded payment for Iraqi oil in the troubled currency while declaring dollars to be “the currency of the enemy.” By 2002, Iraqi oil was being traded in Euros, effectively dumping the dollar. Former US President George W. Bush, who was a deputy of the IBC from the oil industry, used the 9/11 terrorist attacks as a convenient excuse to invade Iraq in March 2003, thus eliminating Saddam’s threat to dollar domination.

When former Libyan leader Muammar al-Qaddafi tried to establish a state-run central bank and trade petroleum in non-dollar currencies, the IBC tapped NATO to intervene. On March 19, 2011, a mere month after initial internal unrest, the Transitional National Council “rebels” announced they were establishing the Libyan Oil Company as the supervisory authority on oil production and policies, and designated the Central Bank of Benghazi as the authority for monetary policies.

That a local group of rebels one month into a rebellion would form a national oil company and designate a private central bank astounded Robert Wenzel of the Economic Policy Journal who remarked, “I have never before heard of a central bank being created in just a matter of weeks out of a popular uprising.” Confirming suspicions of IBC involvement, the US Treasury placed sanctions on Qaddafi’s National Oil Corporation, but assured the rebels, “Should National Oil Corporation subsidiaries or facilities come under different ownership and control, Treasury may consider authorizing dealings with such entities.”

Other countries have had enough of the IBC and its armed wing. Both Russia and China have expressed their distaste for the dollar status quo and US threats of sanctions or military force. On Thursday, Sept. 6, 2012, China announced that any nation in the world that wishes to buy, sell, or trade crude oil can do using the Chinese currency, not the American dollar.

Following suit the next day, Russia announced that it would sell China all the crude oil it wanted but it would not accept US dollars. In addition, Russia has recently unveiled a payment system, called the PRO 100 Universal electronic card, designed to bypass the IBC should it again decide to block credit card services to Russian banks. “There is little doubt in my mind but that Russia and China and no doubt many other countries around the world are getting angry as hell about the US abusing its foreign currency privilege,” wrote investment banker Jay Taylor.

Iran, of course, has long been targeted by the IBC for refusing to surrender to US-imposed sanctions and threats of military force. Iran had completely eliminated the use of US dollars for oil trading by December 2007 and inaugurated its Bourse (stock exchange) for trading petroleum in non-dollar currencies in February 2008, coinciding with the 29th anniversary of the victory of the Islamic Revolution. Additionally, the IBC has tried to cut off Iran from using SWIFT, Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications, for international transactions. However, with the world's second-largest gas reserves and third-largest oil reserves, Iran retains the potential to strike a major blow against US dollar hegemony.

The question is how can we put an end to this stranglehold on the global financial system by the IBC and its armed wing? Hensm gives us a simple, straightforward answer: “Destroy US dollar hegemony, and the ‘Empire’ will collapse.” If more nations join Iran, Russia and China, and opt out of the US dollar protection racket, then this evil “Empire” will surely collapse along with its armed wing.

Prime Minister John Key announced the deal after a meeting with Chinese Premier Li Keqiang at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing last night (NZ time), the first day of his state visit this week.

The deal would “make doing business with China easier by reducing the costs of converting between the two currencies, and will stimulate trade and investment”, Key said.

The announcement was a sign of “how close the relationship is growing”. Since he became prime minister, exports had quadrupled to $10 billion, he said.

SFO Charges Ex-Barclays Bankers Over Libor Rigging
February 17 2014 | From: TheTelegraph

The charges were announced by the SFO and takes the total number of individuals facing criminal proceedings over allegation linked to Libor-rigging to six.

Tom Hayes, a former trader at Citigroup and UBS, was charged last June, while brokers, Terry Farr and James Gilmour were charged a month later.

The SFO is continuing to investigate the manipulation of benchmark interest rates and further charges are expected.

Speaking to The Telegraph in December, David Green, director-general of the SFO, described the investigation into Libor as "enormous" and said he was "sure" more individuals would be charged in connection with the allegations.

Mr Johnson, Mr Mathew, and Mr Contogoulas were among a list of 104 current and former Barclays bankers who last year attempted to keep their identities anonymous as part of a legal case brought against the bank by a care home operator that claims it was defrauded into buying interest rate hedging products.

Barclays declined to comment.

LIBOR’s $300 Trillion In Fraudulent Paper Derivative Contracts Revealed:
Looting Jig Is Up!
December 4 2013 | From: PoliticalVelCraft

International Ownership of New Zealand Banks

An Analysis of the Key Majority Shareholders of the Main New Zealand
and Australian Banks

Including a Global Overview and Implications of the Central Banking /
Federal Reserve Banking System

Please copy, distribute and transmit this PDF and / or the download URL under these conditions: That the PDF may not be edited or amended in any way nor may it be used for commercial purposes.

Who Owns New Zealand's Banks? November 23 2013 This project began as a simple investigation into who owns the main banks in New Zealand. We knew they were Australian owned, but that's not quite all. The research quickly became much more involved as the shareholding structure traced right back up through the main Australian banks and into a deeply entangled web of interlocking international shareholdings by way of multiple entities, comprising many of the largest banking and financial institutions in the world. Data from the findings of other research is included and cross-referenced into the upper echelons of corporate ownership, to the central banking and reserve banking systems and ultimately to the Bank for International Settlements. While this research started out with a New Zealand focus, it is ultimately relevant to anyone in any country around the globe, the principles seem to be very similar the world over - especially given who the mega companies at the top are. This is not a book, it is a 20 page long paper with illustrations, written in (hopefully) an easy to digest magazine-style format. The file size is 49MB in order to provide quality for printing. We hope that it serves as an accessible and easy to understand introduction to the ownership structure of the local and global banking systems, and to the key players that are in control. This is important factual information that affects everyone. Please take the time to download and read it. If you feel that this work could be of benefit to others then we would encourage you to share this URL. Click Here to go to the Download Page

The Truth About Free Trade and Free Trade Agreements
Article Text From: Occupy

The theoretical definition of a “free market” is one in which every individual actor in the realm of exchange exists in a state of equality of opportunity; where all compete with one another to produce the best products at the cheapest prices for consumers, thus the most innovative and efficient producers succeed while others fail, unregulated - and unhelped - by the state.

Within “free markets,” what we call “free trade agreements” are meant to reduce barriers such as tariffs, subsidies and regulations so that market "competitors" can freely move products and goods across borders and compete in an ever-expanding global “free market."

The functional, or technical, definition of a “free market” is one in which the state regulates the market – the realm of economic exchange and activity – for the benefit of large transnational corporations and banks.

Barriers to profits, such as environmental, labor, safety and financial regulations, are dismantled. Meanwhile, subsidies and legal rights and protections are granted to major corporations, undermining competition and supporting monopolization.

So while the rhetoric of “free markets” tends to be all about reducing state interference in the economy, in actuality state interference increases - but only for the benefit of large corporations and banks.

At the same time, state “interference” decreases in sectors that benefit the actual population, such as welfare, social services, pensions, healthcare, education, labor protections and so on. In the actual "free market," these protections are dismantled, subjecting populations to “market discipline” quite unlike the large corporations and banks that receive direct protection against “market discipline.”

The most obvious example of this is the post-2008 bank bailouts.

In a theoretical “free market,” all the banks that gambled badly would have failed and collapsed. But with the functional “free market” we have today, the banks went to the state and got bailed out with trillions of dollars of taxpayer money.

The same dichotomy exists for the term “free trade agreement,” which in theory is the opposite of “protectionism,” where states intervene in the market by establishing tariffs, regulations, subsidies and protections for various imports and exports, thus undermining the “free market.”

The technical definition, however, is one in which protectionism is rampant, with enormous subsidies and protective barriers, and very often includes thousands of pages of regulations and provisions. But because all of this is done to protect corporate and financial interests, it is called “free trade.” It is “protectionism” if the barriers, regulations and protections benefit the nation or population and prevent transnational corporations and banks from having unhindered access to the “market”?

Likewise, is it “free trade” if the barriers, regulations, and protections benefit corporations and banks at the expense of the nation and population? In actuality, so-called “free trade” is a drain on the economy, creates enormous national debts, undermines labor, creates poverty and exploitation, wastes natural resources and devastates the environment. However, it is very profitable for banks and corporations, so is endlessly repeated as something “good” and “necessary.”

The Theory of Free Trade

In theory, “free trade” would enhance competition because it would allow all parties to compete on an even playing field internationally, thus companies would have to find ways to lower their costs of production while increasing their product standards, ultimately decreasing the final price to consumers. In this theoretical form of "free trade," the best and cheapest product, the company that made it, and the consumer and society as a whole would all benefit.

The Reality of Free Trade

The reality is the exact opposite: the production cycle is broken up (this is commonly called “offshoring”), which increases the use of transportation, resources and the overall cost of production, making the final product more expensive to consumers. Case in point is the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), where competition between corporations is undermined while access to resources and markets is enhanced, subsidized and protected.

Corporate cooperation with each other and the state is enhanced while the poor, working and middle classes of Canada, the United States and Mexico are put in direct competition with each other. Corporations in Canada and the U.S. close their factories and move them to Mexico where labor is cheaper, increasing unemployment and poverty, destroying unions and labor protections, and forcing down wages while costs and corporate profits increase.

The role of the state is to regulate these markets and agreements for the benefit of the corporations and banks, and to force the populations to compete with each other in a race to the bottom: market monopolization for the elite, and market discipline for the population.

The break-up of the production cycle, especially from the late 1980s onward, has redefined what “trade” actually is. Typically, we think of trade as a system where countries export and import products or goods. With the era of “free trade,” the production cycle was no longer confined within national borders, and was broken up between several countries.

The result was that a large percentage of what we call “trade” is actually one corporation moving parts or goods to a subsidiary or another corporation in a different country, to continue the production cycle until it returns to the home country as a finished product for consumption.

This is referred to as “intra-industry trade” (transporting parts or goods between corporations) or “intra-firm trade” (transporting parts or goods between a corporation and its subsidiaries). When the parts move across borders, often several times before the final product is created, customs agents at borders register the cumulative value of those products as a “traded” good, and these numbers are then used to determine the “actual contribution” of that good to the economy.

For example, a product which has parts manufactured in Canada, assembled in Mexico, and sold in the United States, would have to cross borders several times before it becomes a final product. Each time the parts cross a border, the total value of those parts at that time of transport gets registered as an import/export, instead of differentiating between the value added at each part of the production cycle. Thus, the statistics of exports and imports become heavily skewed and inflated since they do not account for “value-added.” While the production cycle is broken up over several countries, the determination of “value” is not broken up to fit the actual trading system as it exists.

For a hypothetical comparison to reveal how absurd this process is, imagine a country that attempts to measure the total education of its population by including in its statistics the degrees and credentials of all the tourists who entered the country for short periods of time. The recorded education level of the country’s population would be enormously inflated, since the educated tourists entering the nation would not be staying and contributing their education to the benefit of the society. Something similar happens when parts move across borders several times before they become a finished product, yet have their total value registered each time they cross a border.

According to a report from a Canadian think tank, the Conference Board of Canada, if countries were to apply a “value-added” measurement of trade instead of using inflated numbers applied to the cumulative value of a good, the actual contribution of trade to a country would rapidly diminish.

In conventional measurements, trade accounts for 35% of Canada’s economy, but with the value-added measurement, it drops to 24%. These manipulations are important because they serve as a basis for claiming that countries like Canada are “trade dependent” nations, which justify implementing more “free trade” agreements.

When a country imports more than it exports, it builds up a large amount of debt called a trade deficit. When a country exports more than it imports, it establishes a trade surplus.

However, because the process of determining the value of imports and exports is enormously inflated and misleading, countries are saddled with inflated and inaccurate debts. They are then pressured into reducing those debts through austerity measures, which punish those countries' populations into poverty.

Foxconn, the company that manufactures Apple products in China has been plagued with disaster stories. The relentless working hours and conditions had driven so many 'employees' to suicide by jumping off the roof that the company had to install preventative safety nets and window bars.

Apple is a great example of this process, often hailed as one of the great corporate success stories, being enormously profitable and therefore “good for the economy.” As the Asian Development Bank Institute in Tokyo reported in 2010, while Apple is a U.S.-based company, the iPhone is itself considered to be a Chinese export to the U.S.

The iPhone is produced in many different pieces and parts through several Asian and European countries, which are then transported to China where they are assembled and shipped to the United States and elsewhere.

The estimated value of the Chinese laborers in assembling the iPhone was 3.6% (or $6.50) of the total value of the finished product, estimated at $178.96 in 2009. Yet, the wholesale cost of the shipped iPhone is credited to China as an export. China was merely the last stop in the production cycle, but China records the total value of the finished product as an export, while the United States records it as an import. Thus, the researchers at the Asian Development Bank Institute concluded that “even high-tech products invented by U.S. companies will not increase U.S. exports.”

Pascal Lamy, director-general of the World Trade Organization (WTO), commented, “What we call ‘Made in China’ is indeed assembled in China, but what makes up the commercial value of the product comes from the numerous countries... The concept of country of origin for manufactured goods has gradually become obsolete.”

If trade statistics were adjusted to reflect the actual value contributed to a given product by a country, the U.S. trade deficit with China (which in 2010 stood at $226.88 billion) would likely be cut in half. In 2009, the iPhone left the United States with a $1.9 billion trade deficit with China, but if the value-added approach to determining trade statistics were applied, the United States would have a $48 million trade surplus with China (in relation to the iPhone alone).

With the production cycle broken up and scattered around the globe, this adds enormous costs to transportation of equipment, machinery, goods and products between these nations, which in turn requires enormous quantities of oil and fuel to facilitate this transport system, and thus produces unnecessary amounts of pollution.

Because of the high costs of transportation, fuel, and assembly, the value of the end product goes up, making it far more costly than if it were simply produced in one or two countries.

With countries determining their exports and imports based on inflated and inaccurate statistics, populations are saddled with enormous debts and thus the financial cost of breaking up the production cycle lands on the shoulders of the population, who were already subjected to increased competition between labor forces, reduced environmental and social protections, dismantled subsidies and regulations, increased personal debt and poverty.

So if “free trade agreements” are bad for people, bad for labor – at home and abroad – and bad for the environment and the nation as a whole, why are they pursued?

The answer is simple: they create enormous profits for banks and corporations, whose losses are subsidized by the state. In an actual “free market,” breaking up the production cycle would be far too costly to be a rational choice for a corporation, but because the state takes on the cost of doing so (largely through its trade deficit), the process continues.

When it comes to agreements like the Trans-Pacific Partnership, it is not difficult to see what the results will be: increased subsidies, protections and regulations for the benefit of large corporations and banks (notably the 600 corporations involved in secretly drafting the agreement over recent years) and decreased protections, subsidies and regulations that benefit the population, environment and society as a whole.

The TPP advances corporate monopolistic protections through intellectual property rights; undermines labor protections, putting the working class of 11 different nations in direct competition with one another; dismantles environmental protections and financial regulations; and expands corporate rights and privileges to allow undemocratic corporate institutions to challenge national laws through an unaccountable international tribunal of corporate lawyers who are given powers to overturn national laws or demand immense compensation from any nations that hinder those corporations' “potential profits,” thus further increasing the heavy cost of “free trade.”

The Occupy movement and other activists have a strong mandate to oppose the TPP and all related “free trade agreements.” Popular opinion is swinging against “free trade” as people seem instinctively to recognize – even without all the details – that such agreements undermine labor, increase debt and benefit only the rich.

But while public opinion may oppose the TPP in principle, the bigger problem is that "the public" does not know the TPP even exists. This is a challenge that the Occupy movement can step up to: promoting an educational campaign that crosses borders, organizing international protests and actions against the TPP, and establishing a “free market” of resistance based upon the “free trade” of information.

As corporate rights expand and democratic rights decrease, so must people demand an end to the TPP. Organized resistance, information and action have stopped “free trade agreements” in the past, and they can – and must – do so in the future. The coming corporate tyranny of the Trans-Pacific Partnership can only be defeated through a democratic movement of Transnational People Power.

Our already frail and dying democratic institutions lack the capacity to take up the challenge, so the challenge now rests with the people alone.




Article Text Source: Occupy

Central Banking and The Federal Reserve System

1. Central Banking

The Federal Reserve System of the United States and Central Banking in the rest of the world are parts of the same system.

The two countries remaining without a central bank are Monaco and the Vatican. If you understand anything about who is in control of these places, you will understand why they do not have nor ‘require’ central banks.

It is in fact true that the Rothschild family has been slowly but surely establishing their central banks in every country of the world, giving them an incredible amount of wealth and power.


By 2000 there were seven countries left without an (effectively) Rothschild owned central bank:

Afghanistan, Iraq, Sudan, Libya, Cuba, North Korea, Iran


It is no coincidence that these countries were and are still being attacked by the western media, since one of the main reasons these countries were under attack in the first place was because they did not have a central bank in place.

The first step in establishing a central bank in a country is to get them to accept an outrageous loan, which puts the country in debt of the central bank and under the control of the Rothschilds.




If the country does not accept the loan, the leader of this particular country will be assassinated and a Rothschild aligned leader will be put into position, and if the assassination does not work, the country will be invaded and a central bank will be established with force all under the name of terrorism.

The Attacks of September 11th 2001 were an inside job, one of many reasons of which was to invade Afghanistan and Iraq to then establish central banks in those countries.


After the ensuing engineered wars, by 2003 there were only five countries without a central bank:

Sudan, Libya, Cuba, North Korea, Iran


The only countries left in 2011 without a central bank were:

Cuba, North Korea, Iran


It should also be noted that neither Monaco nor The Vatican have a central bank. These however are very small, cabal controlled entities and so would never be subjected to central banking.

After the instigated protests and riots in the Arab countries the banksters finally paved their way to establishing central banks, getting rid of many leaders in the process - which gave them even more power.

Central banks are not owned by their local corporate governments, they are privately owned and are completely separate from the Treasury departments of their respective governments.


What Do Central Banks Actually Do?

Central banks all make convoluted cover statements in order to justify their existence. That is not to say that all of the staff are in on it, but those who are at the top of each reserve bank know exactly what they are doing. They are either part of the cabal, or minions of it under bribery and or threat.


What Central Banks Say They Do:

“Ensure that, throughout the economy, money works as well as possible as a mechanism for making transactions, storing value, and keeping account. The Bank also promotes a sound and efficient financial system. To fulfil these functions, the Bank carries out a wide range of tasks, from operating monetary policy to monitoring and supervising the health of the financial system, maintaining foreign reserves, operating in the financial markets if necessary, and issuing currency as required.” – Quote excerpt from The Reserve Bank of New Zealand

The last thing that any of them want you to know is that they are not part of the government (governments are all actually corporations anyway and as such cannot govern legally but that is another paper) as central banks are in fact privately owned. The Reserve Bank of New Zealand is ‘officially listed’ as an asset of the crown, which is effectively the banksters which run the City of London – not the Queen of England.

The first and most important question that arises with regards to central banks is:

“Why is a privately owned and run banking institution issuing and controlling the currency of my country?”

It is interesting to note that within the very large Reserve Bank of New Zealand coat of arms, located on the wall to the rear of the reception area of said central bank, you will see a red shield. As we know, in old German, red shield translates to Roth-schild (red-shield).




If you look closely you can see the red shield (Roths - Child in old German)


What Central Banks Actually Do:

Central banks do more harm than good. From obscuring the true cost of credit to causing confusion about good investments, central bankers end up papering over economic problems. And when they send the wrong messages to savers and consumers trying to coordinate their plans, boom and bust cycles lengthen and worsen.

In effect, the central banks have almost complete control of a country’s economy, and can create and control boom and bust cycles.

“There are a number of ways the Reserve Bank helps to maintain financial stability, including through the regulation and supervision of banks, non-bank deposit takers and insurers, promoting the smooth operation of financial markets, and building sound financial market infrastructure. It is also important to understand developments that could make the financial system vulnerable to instability, and respond appropriately. The Reserve Bank conducts regular surveillance of financial risks and reports on its assessments in the six-monthly Financial Stability Report.” – Quote excerpt from The Reserve Bank of New Zealand

This is an important point, because it ties us back into our shareholder investigation:

All of the financial institutions of virtually every country are registered with, regulated by and supervised by their local central bank.

Central banks and central bankers are the reason why the world is in economic and martial turmoil and why many millions of people languish in the pits of poverty and financial ruin.

Central banks are privately owned or controlled cartels which covertly run the world. They operate for the exclusive profit of a small group of powerful families whose death grip on global finance can be traced back generations. They control governments, monarchies, and multinational organisations like the UN, the WHO, the WTO, and a host of other influential bodies.

Using massive wealth accumulated fraudulently over generations they’ve managed to co-opt or illicitly influence political parties, trade unions, the law courts, medical associations, religious hierarchies, universities & academies, mass media, and the like, to promote their policies and to eradicate all opposition. They wield their inordinate global control by indoctrinating chosen “leaders” into powerful secret societies and insider groups like the Freemasons, Bilderberg, Council on Foreign Relations, just to name a few.

Three essential pillars of their domination of the world economy and global finance are the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, and the Bank for International Settlements. The first two were set up at Bretton Woods in 1944 to plunder and loot and enrich a handful of bankster dynasties.

The latter is known as the central bank to the world’s central banks. It was set up by British and American banksters in conjunction with the Nazis in 1930 and was guilty of appalling war crimes for which it was never ever punished.

We were fortuitously alerted to the plot of Rothschild-controlled central banks ruling the world by Professor Caroll Quigley in his 1966 book, Tragedy And Hope, a scholarly tome of almost 1,400 pages. Quigley was an insider in the exclusive world of the corporatists and the international bankers and had access to private research material. For some unknown reason, the original publisher Macmillan only printed 9,000 copies.

Professor Quigley wrote:

“The powers of financial capitalism had another far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert by secret agreements arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences.” Tragedy And Hope, (see Chapter 20).

2. The Federal Reserve System

The Federal Reserve System of the United States probably has the highest profile of all of the central banks. It is highly influential in the central banking hierarchy.

G. Edward Griffin is an American film producer, author, and political lecturer. He is perhaps best known as the author of The Creature from Jekyll Island (1994), a critique of much modern economic theory and practice, specifically the Federal Reserve System.

In beginning to describe this situation, Mr Griffin reckons the best place to begin is with the formation of the "creature from Jekyll Island"; the creation of the Federal Reserve. Jekyll Island is a real island that's off the coast of Georgia. It was on that island back in 1910 that the Federal Reserve System was created at a highly secret meeting that took place there. The year was 1910, that was three years before the Federal Reserve Act was finally passed into law. It was November of that year when Senator Nelson Aldrich sent his private railroad car to the railroad station in New Jersey and there it was in readiness for the arrival of himself and six other men who were told to come under conditions of great secrecy. Senator Nelson Aldrich was the Republican whip in the Senate, he was the chairman of the National Monetary Commission which was the special committee of Congress created for the purpose of making a recommendation to Congress for proposed legislation to reform banking.

Senator Nelson Aldrich was the Republican whip in the Senate, he was the chairman of the National Monetary Commission which was the special committee of Congress.

That was one of the purposes of the National Monetary Commission which was to propose legislation to break the grip of the money trust and Aldrich was chairman of that committee. He was also the very important business associate of J. P. Morgan. He was the father-in-law of John D. Rockefeller, Jr. which means that eventually he became the grandfather of Nelson Rockefeller, our former vice-president. His full name was Nelson Aldrich Rockefeller; his middle name being derived from his famous grandfather.

Abraham Andrew who was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury. He later became a Congressman and he was very important in banking circles.

Frank Vanderlip was there. He was the President of the National City Bank of New York which was the largest of all of the banks in America representing the financial interests of William Rockefeller and the international investment firm of Kuhn, Loeb & Company

Henry Davison was there, the senior partner of the J. P. Morgan Company. Charles Norton was there; he was the President of the First National Bank of New York which was another one of the giants.

Benjamin Strong was at the meeting; he was the head of J. P. Morgan's Banker's Trust Company and three years later he would become the first head of the Federal Reserve System.

Paul Warburg who was probably the most important at the meeting because of his knowledge of banking as it was practiced in Europe. Paul Warburg was born in Germany and eventually became a naturalized American citizen. He was a partner in Kuhn, Loeb & Company and was a representative of the Rothschild banking dynasty in England and France where he maintained very close working relationships throughout his entire career with his brother, Max Warburg, who was the head of the Warburg banking consortium in Germany and the Netherlands.




'The Clubhouse' on Jekyll Island, Georgia USA


These were the seven men aboard that railroad car who were at Jekyll Island. Amazing as it may seem, they represented approximately 1/4 of the wealth of the entire world. These are the men that sat around the table and created the Federal Reserve System.

Consider the composition of this group. Here we had the Morgans, the Rockefellers, Kuhn, Loeb & Company, the Rothschilds and the Warburgs. Anything strange about that mixture? These were competitors. They were the major competitors in the field of investment and banking in those days; these were the giants. Prior to this period they were beating their heads against each other, blood all over the battlefield fighting for dominance in the financial markets of the world. Not only in New York but London, Paris and everywhere. And here they are sitting around a table coming to an agreement of some kind.

A cartel is a group of independently owned businesses which come together for the purpose of reducing or eliminating competition between themselves to enhance their profit margin or to secure their positions in the market. They do this by various means one of which is price fixing – i.e. no competition on price. There are other means.

On New Zealand’s Prime Minister – John Key In 1995 John Key became Merrill Lynch's Head of Asian foreign exchange in Singapore, where later in that same year he was promoted to the Head of Foreign Exchange of Merrill Lynch Global in London. He was also Head of Bonds and Derivatives, Merill Lynch (around 2001 - according to his own website). Key was a Member of the Foreign Exchange Committee of the New York Federal Reserve Bank from 1999 to 2001. Membership is by appointment only. Left: A picture paints a thousand words. The tie is even the right colour

3. The Bank for International Settlements

The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) is the most powerful bank in the world.

“The powers of financial capitalism had another far reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole.” –Prof. Caroll Quigley, Georgetown University, Tragedy and Hope (1966)

The Bank for International Settlements has been called the “Central Banks’ Central Bank” and it is headquartered in Basel, Switzerland.

The BIS is a closed organisation of 60 major central bank members (including the Reserve Bank of New Zealand and the US Federal Reserve of course), and the decisions made in Basel often have more of an impact on the direction of the global economy than anything the president of the United States or the U.S. Congress are doing.

All you have to do is to look back at the last financial crisis to see an example of this. Basel II and Basel 2.5 played a major role in precipitating the subprime mortgage meltdown. Now a new set of regulations known as "Basel III" are being rolled out. The implementation of these new regulations is beginning this year, and they will be completely phased in by 2019. These new regulations dramatically increase capital requirements and significantly restrict the use of leverage.

Those certainly sound like good goals, the problem is that the entire global financial system is based on credit at this point, and these new regulations are going to substantially reduce the flow of credit.
The only way that the giant debt bubble that we are all living in can continue to persist is if it continues to expand. By restricting the flow of credit, these new regulations threaten to burst the debt bubble and bring down the entire global economy.




Translated from the original German article Sept. 19 2013: The Bank for International Settlements warns the situation with financial markets is worse than prior to the Lehman Bros. bankruptcy. This could be why the US Federal Reserve is now printing money indefinitely, as control over debt has long gone.


Note that the current global financial system is sustainable by any means. Anyone with half a brain can see that the global financial system is a pyramid scheme that is destined to collapse. But Basel III may cause it to collapse faster than it might otherwise have.

The heads of these 60 central banks travel to the Basel headquarters once every two months, and the General Meeting, the BIS’s supreme executive body, takes place once a year.

Formally registered as a stock corporation, it is recognised as an international organisation and, therefore, is not subject to any jurisdiction other than international law. Interestingly, the BIS is largely immune from regulation, oversight or taxes and its members and employees enjoy extensive immunity. No other institution regulates the BIS, despite the fact that it manages about 4 percent of the world’s total currency reserves, or €217 trillion ($304 trillion), as well as 120 tons of gold.

Central bankers are not elected by the people but are appointed by their governments. Nevertheless, they wield power that exceeds that of many political leaders. Their decisions affect entire economies, and a single word from their lips is capable of moving financial markets. They set interest rates, thereby determining the cost of borrowing and the speed of global financial currents.

The BIS has been scandal-ridden ever since it was branded with pro-Nazi leanings in the 1930s. Founded in Basel, Switzerland, in 1930, the BIS has been called “the most exclusive, secretive, and powerful supranational club in the world.” Charles Higham wrote in his book Trading with the Enemy that by the late 1930s, the BIS had assumed an openly pro-Nazi bias, a theme that was expanded on in a BBC Timewatch film titled “Banking with Hitler” broadcast in 1998.

In 1944, the American government backed a resolution at the Bretton-Woods Conference calling for the liquidation of the BIS, following Czech accusations that it was laundering gold stolen by the Nazis from occupied Europe; but the central bankers succeeded in quietly snuffing out the American resolution.

“Making the Most of Borrowed Time 23 June 2013 - 83rd BIS Annual Report 2012/2013 “Originally forged to describe central banks' actions to prevent financial collapse, "whatever it takes" has become a rallying cry for them to continue their extraordinary policies. But we are past the height of the crisis, and the goal of policy today is to return to strong and sustainable growth. Authorities need to hasten structural reforms so that economic resources can more easily be used in the most productive manner. Households and firms have to complete the repair of their balance sheets. Governments must redouble their efforts to ensure the sustainability of their finances. And regulators have to adapt the rules to an increasingly interconnected and complex financial system and ensure that banks set aside sufficient capital to match the associated risks. Only forceful efforts at such repair and reform can return economies to strong and sustainable real growth.“

The New Zealand Government: A United States SEC Registered Corporation

Why A Corporation May Not Legally Govern; Corporatised Governments of Other Countries
& An Investigation into the Reserve Bank of New Zealand 'Corporation'

Please copy, distribute and transmit this PDF and / or the download URL under these conditions: That the PDF may not be edited or amended in any way nor may it be used for commercial purposes.

Would you be surprised to discover that a company with the same name as your country is registered with the Security and Exchange Commission (SEC) in Washington DC? The United States Securities and Exchange Commission has the government of New Zealand registered as a corporation under the name of HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN OF ENGLAND IN RIGHT OF NEW ZEALAND. This PDF research paper provides the detail and evidence for this and other associated facts; such as why New Zealand government agencies and departments are registered with the United States Securities and Exchange commission, Dun & Bradstreet and the New York Stock Exchange. This paper also delves into the relevant legalse terminology, implications of the TPP, the quandry of government departments that seem to obfuscate reality - and a conclusion which does it's best to clarify the ridiculous contradictions of the Reserve Bank and the central banking system in general. This is not a book, it is a 10 page long paper with illustrations, written in (hopefully) an easy to digest magazine-style format. The file size is 17MB in order to provide quality for printing. We hope that it serves as an important thought-starter in terms of inspiring 'the people' to take an interest and some action in terms of reclaiming their power back from those who have clearly absconded with it. This is important factual information that affects everyone. Please take the time to download and read it. If you feel that this work could be of benefit to others then we would encourage you to share this URL. Click Here to go to the Download Page

The Truth About Central Banking and Business Cycles
November 23 2013 | From: FEE

World Bank Whistle Blower Exposes All
November 4 2013 | See: KAHudes

10 Corporations Control Almost Everything You Buy — This Chart Shows How
October 21 2013 | From: PolicyMic

According to this chart via Reddit, called "The Illusion of Choice," these corporations create a chain that begins at one of 10 super companies. You've heard of the biggest names, but it's amazing to see what these giants own or influence.

The Biggest Scam In the History Of Mankind (Debt Ceiling Truth)
October 2013 | From: TheHiddenSecretsOfMoney

Learning this will change your life, because it will change the choices that you make. If enough people learn it, it will change the world…because it will change the system .

For this is the biggest Hidden Secret Of Money. Never in human history have so many been plundered by so few, and it’s all accomplished through this…The Biggest Scam In The History Of Mankind.

Confirmed - Loans & Mortgages Are Created Out Of Thin Air By The Banks
February 13 2013 | From: TVNZ / Youtube

Revealed - The Capitalist Network That Runs The World
October 24 2012 | From NewScientist

- David Wilcock

AS PROTESTS against financial power sweep the world this week, science may have confirmed the protesters' worst fears. An analysis of the relationships between 43,000 transnational corporations has identified a relatively small group of companies, mainly banks, with disproportionate power over the global economy.

The idea that a few bankers control a large chunk of the global economy might not seem like news to New York's Occupy Wall Street movement and protesters elsewhere (see photo). But the study, by a trio of complex systems theorists at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich, is the first to go beyond ideology to empirically identify such a network of power. It combines the mathematics long used to model natural systems with comprehensive corporate data to map ownership among the world's transnational corporations (TNCs).

"Reality is so complex, we must move away from dogma, whether it's conspiracy theories or free-market," says James Glattfelder. "Our analysis is reality-based."

Read the full story at: NewScientist


The top 50 of the 147 superconnected companies

1. Barclays plc
2. Capital Group Companies Inc
3. FMR Corporation
4. AXA
5. State Street Corporation
6. JP Morgan Chase & Co
7. Legal & General Group plc
8. Vanguard Group Inc
9. UBS AG
10. Merrill Lynch & Co Inc
11. Wellington Management Co LLP
12. Deutsche Bank AG
13. Franklin Resources Inc
14. Credit Suisse Group
15. Walton Enterprises LLC
16. Bank of New York Mellon Corp
17. Natixis
18. Goldman Sachs Group Inc
19. T Rowe Price Group Inc
20. Legg Mason Inc
21. Morgan Stanley
22. Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc
23. Northern Trust Corporation
24. Société Générale
25. Bank of America Corporation
26. Lloyds TSB Group plc
27. Invesco plc
28. Allianz SE 29. TIAA
30. Old Mutual Public Limited Company
31. Aviva plc
32. Schroders plc
33. Dodge & Cox
34. Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc*
35. Sun Life Financial Inc
36. Standard Life plc
37. CNCE
38. Nomura Holdings Inc
39. The Depository Trust Company
40. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance
41. ING Groep NV
42. Brandes Investment Partners LP
43. Unicredito Italiano SPA
44. Deposit Insurance Corporation of Japan
45. Vereniging Aegon
46. BNP Paribas
47. Affiliated Managers Group Inc
48. Resona Holdings Inc
49. Capital Group International Inc
50. China Petrochemical Group Company

* Lehman still existed in the 2007 dataset used

New Zealand Asset Sales Policy Began On Wall Street
April 8 2012 | From AotearoaAWiderPerspective and Scoop

And another Kiwi gets it. Clutha river is also on the block for more destruction and dam building but what makes it clear in this article is that just like with the planned West coast seabed mining, fracking, Christchurch's rebuilding monopoly of Fletcher all roads lead back to John Key's connection with Wall street and his spectacular and suspect rise in NZ politics.

NZ Asset Sales Policy Began On Wall Street

The Key government's asset sales agenda is derived from the Washington Consensus – a set of Wall Street-driven policies that were pronounced dead after the global financial meltdown in 2008. The New Zealand government, however, remains loyal to this failed ideology.

Why? The obvious link is Prime Minister John Key – a former investment banker for Merrill Lynch, the world's largest brokerage failure.

In most other countries, state asset sales have become a last resort on the road to poverty and ruin, but for the Key government, asset sales are “business as usual.”

So what's really behind asset sales?
All wealth extraction is facilitated by international and national economic policies, coupled with the private banking system, which together deliver benefits to the financial elite by transferring wealth upward within and between nations.

The state asset sales policy is just one of several reforms under the Washington Consensus, a set of monetary and economic policies designed to allow: the privatization of public resources and utilities, the removal of barriers to foreign investment and ownership, the sale of state assets, trade liberalization, deregulation, the lowering of business taxes, and cuts to public services.

These “free market” reforms are collectively termed neoliberalism. Simply, they provide big business with improved legal access to markets and assets worldwide.

As An Encore to Bailing Out the Big Banks, Government to Backstop Derivatives Clearinghouse - In the United States and Abroad
May 26 2012 | From: WashingtonsBlog

That is preventing the economy from recovering … like countries that have grabbed the bull by the horns. The government has allowed the amount of derivatives to reach 1.2 quadrillion dollars.

That is feeding the parasite of casino gambling, which is preventing the real economy from recovering and is killing the host of actual productivity. What is the government doing for an encore? Bailing out the derivatives clearinghouses.

As the Wall Street Journal reported yesterday:

Read the full story and see the video at: WashingtonsBlog

Banking Giant HSBC: 'A Criminal Enterprise'
May 12 2012 | From: WMD

John Cruz, a former vice president and relationship manager, has turned over to WND more than 1,000 pages of documents, including customer account ledgers for dozens of companies through which, he charges, the financial institution was laundering money each month.
Ads by Google

Over-Worked & Under-Paid?Try Trading The Forex Market. Upto $5000 Free On New Accounts! www.UFXMarkets.com/Forex-Trading
Send Money To PhilippinesHave a NZ Bank Account? Send Money Online To Philippines For Free www.orbitremit.com/nz

Cruz told WND that as a relationship manager, it was his responsibility to look up various accounts in the HSBC computer system and visit the account holders in person to offer additional banking products and services.

“I pulled these documents because I thought they were evidence of suspicious activity taking place,” Cruz affirmed when presented by WND with various HSBC computer ledgers of customer accounts. “These same documents I brought to bank security and my managers in the bank.”

To his surprise, HSBC management and security did not welcome his reports of suspicious activity.

“My managers told me I was crazy and I didn’t know what I was talking about,” he said. “They told me it was none of my business what goes on in transactions. But that’s my job.”

WND showed Cruz the HSBC account ledger for a business named United Express, as seen redacted in Exhibit 1 below:

Read the full story and see the video at: WMD

More On 911 Insider Trading Showing Foreknowledge Of The False Flag Event
March 22 2012 | From AotearoaAWiderPerspective

This article appeared originally in the Asian Times . Please visit. The article is copied here for educational purposes only and no profit is made. I acknowledge Lars Shall as the original writer of this publication and I urge everyone to visit the Asian times site. It is an excellent publication with a lot of otherwise accessible information. The reason for the integral publication is my opinion that this kind of information should be available on as many different servers as possible. 

The Deutsche bank mentioned in this article is a financial advisor to the NZ government while Alex Brown & Sons once belonged to Bankers trust at which John key learned the Derivatives ropes .

By Lars Schall

Is there any truth in the allegations that informed circles made substantial profits in the financial markets in connection to the terror attacks of September 11, 2001, on the United States?

Arguably, the best place to start is by examining put options, which occurred around Tuesday, September 11, 2001, to an abnormal extent, and at the beginning via software that played a

key role: the Prosecutor's Management Information System, abbreviated as PROMIS. [i]

PROMIS is a software program that seems to be fitted with almost “magical” abilities. Furthermore, it is the subject of a decades-long dispute between its inventor, Bill Hamilton, and various people/institutions associated with intelligence agencies, military and security consultancy firms. [1]

One of the “magical” capabilities of PROMIS, one has to assume, is that it is equipped with artificial intelligence and was apparently from the outset “able to simultaneously read and integrate any number of different computer programs or databases, regardless of the language in which the original programs had been written or the operating systems and platforms on which that database was then currently installed.” [2]

And then it becomes really interesting:

Read the full story at AotearoaAWiderPerspective

Goldman, Google Executives Resign in Public
March 15 | From TheNationalBusinessReview

Goldman Sachs executive director Greg Smith quit yesterday.

His bosses could read about it in the paper.

Mr Smith wrote a guest editorial for The New York Times lacerating his company. He alleged it now puts its own financial interests ahead of those of clients, who were often described as “muppets”.

The byline tartly notes, Greg Smith is resigning today as a Goldman Sachs executive director.

Mr Smith’s very public attack on his employer came on the heels of a similar diatribe from one James Whittaker, an executive who says he keynoted four Google events during his time with the company as a director of engineering.

Since co-founder Larry Page took over as CEO last year, Google had lost its innovative culture. The company had become obsessed by a series of misguided efforts to peg back Facebook's lead in social networking.

Products like Wave, Buzz and Google+ were "half-assed", and the company had become overly focused on ads.

"Truth is I’ve never been much on advertising," Mr Whittaker wrote.

"I don’t click on ads. When Gmail displays ads based on things I type into my email message it creeps me out."

Read the full story at: TheNationalBusinessReview

Is Germany Actually Preparing To Leave The Euro?
March 12, 2012 | From InfoWars

And at this point there really is not a formal mechanism which would enable other members of the eurozone to kick financially troubled nations such as Greece or Portugal out of the euro. But there is one possibility that is becoming increasingly likely that could actually cause the break up of the euro.

Germany could leave the euro. Yes, it might actually happen. Germany is faced with a very difficult problem right now. It is looking at a future where it will be essentially forced to bail out most of the rest of the nations in the eurozone for many years to come, and those bailouts will be extremely expensive. Meanwhile, the mood in much of the rest of Europe is becoming decidedly anti-German.

In Greece, Angela Merkel and the German government are being openly portrayed as Nazis. Financially troubled nations such as Greece want German bailout money, but they are getting sick and tired of the requirements that Germany is imposing upon them in order to get that money.

Read the full story at: InfoWars

611+ Resignations From World Banks: September 2011 to April 2012
March 7, Latest Update April 24, 2012 | From AmericanKabuki thanks to Benjamin Fulford

"It is not known under what circumstances these [ five hundred and ninety four plus ] individuals have left their positions, I make no judgement on that.

I find the timing of so many resignations extremely curious and a temporal marker in history of high significance.

No one should assume I make any judgement about the character of these people. I frankly don't know their reputations except for a few rather famous ones.

This list includes Banks, Investment Houses, Sovereign Wealth Funds, Equity Funds, Savings Retirement Funds and other shadow banking organizations.

The line is very blurry between these entities, some are owned by banks some are banks, some invest in banks as well as owning entire industries (common in Hong Kong and Japan)."

Below are some interesting pickings, mostly from Australia and New Zealand. Make sure you read the whole list on the link above as it is a fascinating read. For any of you who are familiar with the work of Benjamin Fulford, you will see what is really going on here.

It is interesting to note that the number of resignations has increased exponentially, especially since the beginning of 2012.


9/01/11 (USA NY) Bank of New York Mellon Chief Robert P. Kelly Resigns in a Shake-UP

9/21/11 (AUSTRALIA & NZ) JP Morgan Australia and New Zealand Worldwide Securities Services CEO Jane Perry resigned

9/25/11 (SWITZERLAND) UBS CEO Oswald Gruebel quits over £1.5bn rogue trader crisis

11/02/11 (UK) Lloyds Banking Group chief executive, António Horta-Osório, took leave of absence on health grounds for 6-8 weeks, and has not returned as of March 2012.

1/21/12 (SINGAPORE) ANZ Asia's private banking head Nina Aguas resigns as managing director of Asia-Pacific private banking.

1/29/12 (NEW ZEALAND) New Zealand Reserve Bank Governor Dr Alan Bollard to Step Down

2/15/12 (WORLD) World Bank CEO Zoellick resigns

2/16/12 (AUSTRALIA) ANZ Bank Australia CFO Peter Marriott resigns

2/16/12 (AUSTRALIA) Royal Bank of Scotland Austrailan CEO Stephen Williams resigns

2/17/12 (USA) Goldman Sachs CEO Lloyd Blankfein out by summer

2/20/12 (SWITZERLAND) Credit Suisse Chief Joseph Tan resigns

2/21/12 (ARGENTINA) Central Bank of Argentina (BCRA) Gen Mgr Benigno Velez, resigns

2/24/12 (NEW ZEALAND) FSF Executive Director Kirk Hope resigns

2/25/12 (AUSTRALIA AND NZ) Goldman Sachs Chairman Stephen Fitzgerald quits

2/29/12 (AUSTRALIA) Perpetual portfolio manager Matt Williams steps down

3/5/12 (NEW ZEALAND) Insured Group Bill Jeffries has resigned as chairman and director

3/09/12 (AUSTRALIA) Bank of Queensland CFO Ram Kangatharan plans to leave the bank.

3/10/12 (AUSTRALIA) WESTPAC, Rob Chapman opted to quit running its regional subsidiary St George Bank.


Read the full list at: AmericanKabuki

Alex Jones Names the New Zealand Prime Minister as a Bankster Plant
From AotearoaAWiderPerspective

Here is an interview with Max Keiser in which the New Zealand Prime minister is named as one of the international banker plants. Just in case you still think that we are actually a democracy it is more and more clear that Europe the US and Anglo Saxon countries such as New Zealand are part of an oligarchical global system and it should come as no surprise that like in the US and Europe that Oligarchical elite gets richer and richer while you and I get poorer and poorer.

Harvey Norman, Free Money And Why GE Money Tries To Get You Into Debt
March 1 2012 | TheVinnyEastwoodShow

Who Is Going To Be The Next Unelected Rothschild Representative Running Our Money Supply?
January 31st 2012 | From: AotearoaAWiderPerspective

Bollard who has been the unelected Rothschild representative running this country’s money supply needs to be replaced apparently.

So here are the contenders. Anyone with knowledge about these individuals such as connections with the trilateral commission or Bilderbergers is cordially invited to leave links here.

Reserve Bank chairman Arthur Grimes or former central bank deputy Murray Sherwin could be strong contenders to replace governor Alan Bollard, who will step down later this year, former governor Don Brash says.

But there is likely to be a strong field to take on the $600,000-a-year job that Bollard, 60, is leaving after 10 years.

Read the full story at: AotearoaAWiderPerspective

Former US President Bill Clinton information confirms John Key New Zealand Prime Minister played a large part in the Global Financial Crisis
Novmber 18th 2011

Read the full article at PublicCreditOrBust

Inflation Is A Hidden Tax And Our Governments Are Taxing The Living Daylights Out Of Us
Resource Article | From TheEconomicCollapseBlog

Ronald Reagan once famously declared that inflation is a tax , but sadly most Americans did not really grasp what he was talking about.  If the American people truly understood what inflation was doing to them, they would be screaming bloody murder about monetary policy.  Inflation is an especially insidious tax because it is not just a tax on your income for one year.  It is a continual tax on every single dollar that you own.  As your money sits in the bank, it is constantly losing value.  Over time, the effects of inflation can be absolutely devastating.  For example, if you put 100 dollars in the bank in 1970, those same dollars today would only have about 17 percent of the purchasing power that they did back then.  In essence, you were hit by an 83 percent "inflation tax" and all you did was leave your money in the bank.  So who is responsible for this?  Well, the Federal Reserve controls monetary policy in the United States, and the inflationary monetary policy that the Fed has gotten all of us accustomed to is taxing the living daylights out of us.  This is madness, and it needs to stop.

In previous articles I have discussed how the Federal Reserve creates money.  If you have not read those articles yet, you can find a few of them here , here and here .

The Federal Reserve system is designed to have the U.S. money supply expand indefinitely.

And that is exactly what has happened since 1913.

But when the money supply expands, there are very serious consequences.

Every time more money comes into existence, the dollars that you and I are already holding become less valuable because now there are more dollars chasing the same amount of goods and services.

Right now, the U.S. government says that the annual rate of inflation is somewhere around 2 percent.  Those of you that have to buy food and gas on a regular basis realize how much of a joke that is.

Thankfully, there are others out there that keep track of these statistics as well.  According to John Williams of shadowstats.com , if inflation was measured the same way that it was back in 1980, the annual rate of inflation would be more than 10 percent right now.

But let's use the doctored government numbers for a moment.  Using the doctored numbers, what inflation has done to all of us is still absolutely horrific.  Just check out the chart below.  This is what the Federal Reserve was designed to do.  It was designed to constantly expand the money supply and create inflation that never ends....

Read the full story at: TheEconomicCollapseBlog

Anonymous: Federal Reserve Caught Red Handed
March 3 2012 | TheContrail

Bankers Jumping Ship as Corrupt Banking at the Highest Levels Exposed.

Lord James Blackheath: 15 Trillion Dollar Fraud Exposed in UK Parliament Implicates Federal Reserve
March 2 2012

Banker Left Speechless by Irish Journalist
February 28 2012 | From: TheSolariReport

Two Former New Zealand Justice Ministers Convicted in Lombard Finance Case
February 24 2012 | From NoRightTurn

Also to be celebrated: neither of these two will be leaching free travel off the taxpayer any more. As a five-term MP, he was entitled (as a consequence of MP's self-interested feather-bedding) to a 90% rebate on private domestic and international travel. Jeffries was entitled to 60%. But thanks to amendments passed to the Speaker's Directions [PDF] two years ago, those entitlements are automatically stripped on conviction for serious crime. Its one way of cleaning up the tail of undeserving former Parliamentary parasites, I suppose.

As for the question of Graham's knighthood, of course it should be stripped - not for criminality, but simply as a matter of course. Feudal titles have no place in modern, democratic New Zealand, and they should all be revoked.

The Costs of Inflation | Interview with Dr. Steve Horwitz
February 24 2012

Goldman Sachs Steals Even More of Europe
February 24 2012 | From: AotearoaAWiderPerspective

If you or I would tell the bank which holds our mortgage we would only pay 90 cents on the dollar I think we would be out of our house pretty darn quick and it would most definitely be because we defaulted  on our loan. So what happened in Greece? For a good explanation read this epistle.

But that is only part of the story and here is what happened too and why this means Goldman Sachs stole Europe!

Until Monday investors whether they be countries, banks, hedge funds or private investors who bought bonds issued by countries knew what the rules were and the risks they were taking but the ECB has changed this overnight. They did so by swapping the old Greek debt for new Greek debt in which a clause has changed excluding the European Central bank from the “collective action clause.”

Read the full story at : AotearoaAWiderPerspective

Joan Veon on the Engineered Financial Collapse
February 6 2012 | From AotearoaAWiderPerspective

As I am watching this fascinating presentation I have to urge you to watch this in its entirety. The structural changes chapter is horrifying in the scope in which it transfers the powers of congress to the bankers and the chapter on derivatives (the source of John Key's wealth) is just beyond comprehension in it's epic scale of deceit. Send this link to all your buddies who still think the sun shines out of John Key's arse. And then give them the link to my open letter to Eugene Bingham .

Iain Parker , one of the most knowledgeable researchers on international finance and the banking system currently collapsing our entire global economy by design pointed me to Joan Veon an amazingly knowledgeable woman presenting the history and current financial situation before she passed away because of cancer.

Here is her enlightening presentation. Especially the tax law changes under Reagan are stunning.

Simplified Analyogy the International Banking Crisis:
The Laws of Economics for the Drinker and Banks
January 21st 2012 | From Reszatonline

It’s time again to benefit from my very good friend and occasional co-author Tim Coldwell as a source of ideas and connections. He discovered the following little text for us which allows us to enhance our understanding of economic relations and policy processes, and of the rationale behind current financial regulation.

Here is a dummies guide to what went wrong in Europe:

Helga is the proprietor of a bar.

She realizes that virtually all of her customers are unemployed alcoholics and, as such, can no longer afford to patronise her bar.

To solve this problem, she comes up with a new marketing plan that allows her customers to drink now, but pay later.

Helga keeps track of the drinks consumed on a ledger (thereby granting the customers’ loans).

Word gets around about Helga’s “drink now, pay later” marketing strategy and, as a result, increasing numbers of customers flood into Helga’s bar.

Soon she has the largest sales volume for any bar in town.

By providing her customers freedom from immediate payment demands, Helga gets no resistance when, at regular intervals, she substantially increases her prices for wine and beer, the most consumed beverages. Consequently, Helga’s gross sales volume increases massively.

A young and dynamic vice-president at the local bank recognizes that these customer debts constitute valuable future assets and increases Helga’s borrowing limit.

He sees no reason for any undue concern, since he has the debts of the unemployed alcoholics as collateral!

At the bank’s corporate headquarters, expert traders figure a way to make huge commissions, and transform these customer loans into DRINKBONDS. These “securities” then are bundled and traded on international securities markets.

Naive investors don’t really understand that the securities being sold to them as “AA” “Secured Bonds” really are debts of unemployed alcoholics.

Nevertheless, the bond prices continuously climb and the securities soon become the hottest-selling items for some of the nation’s leading brokerage houses.

One day, even though the bond prices still are climbing, a risk manager at the original local bank decides that the time has come to demand payment on the debts incurred by the drinkers at Helga’s bar.

He so informs Helga.

Helga then demands payment from her alcoholic patrons, but being unemployed alcoholics they cannot pay back their drinking debts.

Since Helga cannot fulfil her loan obligations she is forced into bankruptcy.

The bar closes and Helga’s 11 employees lose their jobs.

Overnight, DRINKBOND prices drop by 90%. The collapsed bond asset value destroys the bank’s liquidity and prevents it from issuing new loans, thus freezing credit and economic activity in the community.

The suppliers of Helga’s bar had granted her generous payment extensions and had invested their firms’ pension funds in the BOND securities. They find they are now faced with having to write off her bad debt and with losing over 90% of the presumed value of the bonds.

Her wine supplier also claims bankruptcy, closing the doors on a family business that had endured for three generations, her beer supplier is taken over by a competitor, who immediately closes the local plant and lays off 150 workers.

Fortunately though, the bank, the brokerage houses and their respective executives are saved and bailed out by a multibillion dollar no-strings attached cash infusion from the government.

The funds required for this bailout are obtained by new taxes levied on employed, middle-class, non-drinkers who have never been in Helga’s bar.

Now do you understand?

The Global Elite Are Hiding 18 Trillion Dollars In Offshore Banks
January 21st 2012 | From PrisonPlanet.com

In recent days, the fact that Mitt Romney has millions of dollars parked down in the Cayman Islands has made headlines all over the world. But when it comes to offshore banking, what Mitt Romney is doing is small potatoes.

The truth is that the global elite are hiding an almost unbelievable amount of money in offshore banks. According to shocking research done by the IMF, the global elite are holding a total of18 trillion dollars in offshore banks. And that figure does not even count any money being held in Switzerland. That is a staggering amount of money.

Keep in mind that U.S. GDP in 2010 was only 14.58 trillion dollars. So why do the global elite go to such trouble to hide their money in offshore banks?

Well, there are two main reasons. One is privacy and the other is low taxation. Privacy is a big issue for those that are involved in illegal enterprises such as drug running, but the biggest reason why people move money into offshore banks is in order to avoid taxes.

Some set up bank accounts in foreign nations because they want to legally minimize their taxes and others set up bank accounts in foreign nations because they want to illegally avoid taxes.

You would be absolutely amazed at what some large corporations and wealthy individuals do to get out of paying taxes. Unfortunately, the vast majority of the rest of us don’t have the resources or the knowledge to play these games, so we get taxed into oblivion.

Read the full story at PrisonPlanet.com

The Large Families that Rule the World
October 18 | 2011 | From: Pravda

Some people have started realizing that there are large financial groups that dominate the world. Forget the political intrigues, conflicts, revolutions and wars. It is not pure chance. Everything has been planned for a long time.

Some call it "conspiracy theories" or New World Order. Anyway, the key to understanding the current political and economic events is a restricted core of families who have accumulated more wealth and power.

We are speaking of 6, 8 or maybe 12 families who truly dominate the world. Know that it is a mystery difficult to unravel.

We will not be far from the truth by citing Goldman Sachs, Rockefellers, Loebs Kuh and Lehmans in New York, the Rothschilds of Paris and London, the Warburgs of Hamburg, Paris and Lazards Israel Moses Seifs Rome.

Many people have heard of the Bilderberg Group, Illuminati or the Trilateral Commission. But what are the names of the families who run the world and have control of states and international organizations like the UN, NATO or the IMF?

To try to answer this question, we can start with the easiest: inventory, the world's largest banks, and see who the shareholders are and who make the decisions.

The world's largest companies are now: Bank of America, JP Morgan, Citigroup, Wells Fargo, Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley.

Let us now review who their shareholders are.

Bank of America:
State Street Corporation, Vanguard Group, BlackRock, FMR (Fidelity), Paulson, JP Morgan, T. Rowe, Capital World Investors, AXA, Bank of NY, Mellon.

JP Morgan:
State Street Corp., Vanguard Group, FMR, BlackRock, T. Rowe, AXA, Capital World Investor, Capital Research Global Investor, Northern Trust Corp. and Bank of Mellon.

Citigroup:
State Street Corporation, Vanguard Group, BlackRock, Paulson, FMR, Capital World Investor, JP Morgan, Northern Trust Corporation, Fairhome Capital Mgmt and Bank of NY Mellon.

Wells Fargo:
Berkshire Hathaway, FMR, State Street, Vanguard Group, Capital World Investors, BlackRock, Wellington Mgmt, AXA, T. Rowe and Davis Selected Advisers.

We can see that now there appears to be a nucleus present in all banks: State Street Corporation, Vanguard Group, BlackRock and FMR (Fidelity). To avoid repeating them, we will now call them the "big four":

Goldman Sachs:
"The big four," Wellington, Capital World Investors, AXA, Massachusetts Financial Service and T. Rowe.

Morgan Stanley:
"The big four," Mitsubishi UFJ, Franklin Resources, AXA, T. Rowe, Bank of NY Mellon e Jennison Associates. Rowe, Bank of NY Mellon and Jennison Associates.


We can just about always verify the names of major shareholders. To go further, we can now try to find out the shareholders of these companies and shareholders of major banks worldwide.

Bank of NY Mellon:
Davis Selected, Massachusetts Financial Services, Capital Research Global Investor, Dodge, Cox, Southeatern Asset Mgmt. and ... "The big four."

State Street Corporation (one of the "big four"):
Massachusetts Financial Services, Capital Research Global Investor, Barrow Hanley, GE, Putnam Investment and ... The "big four" (shareholders themselves!).

BlackRock (another of the "big four"):
PNC, Barclays e CIC.


Who is behind the PNC? FMR (Fidelity), BlackRock, State Street, etc.
And behind Barclays? BlackRock

And we could go on for hours, passing by tax havens in the Cayman Islands, Monaco or the legal domicile of Shell companies in Liechtenstein. A network where companies are always the same, but never a name of a family.

In short: the eight largest U.S. financial companies (JP Morgan, Wells Fargo, Bank of America, Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, U.S. Bancorp, Bank of New York Mellon and Morgan Stanley) are 100% controlled by ten shareholders and we have four companies always present in all decisions: BlackRock, State Street, Vanguard and Fidelity.

In addition, the Federal Reserve is comprised of 12 banks, represented by a board of seven people, which comprises representatives of the "big four," which in turn are present in all other entities.

In short, the Federal Reserve is controlled by four large private companies: BlackRock, State Street, Vanguard and Fidelity. These companies control U.S. monetary policy (and world) without any control or "democratic" choice. These companies launched and participated in the current worldwide economic crisis and managed to become even more enriched.

To finish, a look at some of the companies controlled by this "big four" group:

Alcoa Inc.

Altria Group Inc.

American International Group Inc.

AT&T Inc.

Boeing Co.

Caterpillar Inc.

Coca-Cola Co.

DuPont & Co.

Exxon Mobil Corp.

General Electric Co.

General Motors Corporation

Hewlett-Packard Co.

Home Depot Inc.

Honeywell International Inc.

Intel Corp.

International Business Machines Corp

Johnson & Johnson

JP Morgan Chase & Co.

McDonald's Corp.

Merck & Co. Inc.

Microsoft Corp.

3M Co.

Pfizer Inc.

Procter & Gamble Co.

United Technologies Corp.

Verizon Communications Inc.

Wal-Mart Stores Inc.

Time Warner

Walt Disney

Viacom

Rupert Murdoch's News Corporation.,

CBS Corporation

NBC Universal

The same "big four" control the vast majority of European companies counted on the stock exchange.

In addition, all these people run the large financial institutions, such as the IMF, the European Central Bank or the World Bank, and were "trained" and remain "employees" of the "big four" that formed them.

The names of the families that control the "big four", never appear.

The Take Down of Glass Steagall

G Edward Griffin, the Federal Reserve and John Key or How Time Flies
Yuki Fujita – Japanese MP

In March 2008 I was in Sydney. I had flown there to meet with some of the high profile 9/11 truth activists. I met with Bob Bowman the ex US military who ran the Space war program for Reagan until he woke up to the fact that there was nothing defensive about the program. I met with Yuki Fujita San the Japanese MP who broke into the MSM with his presentation about the inconsistencies of the official 9/11 CT to name a few but the most important meeting in hind side was the meeting I had with  gentleman called G Edward Griffin. I had never met him before and never even heard of him and a participant of the 9/11 truth conference of 2008 in Sydney had flown him in at his own expense to give the presentation he is famous for.

After I heard his presentation I had the chance to speak to G Edward Griffin and I used the time I had to ask him some questions and here are two poignant moments of the conversation I will never ever forget as long as I live.

I told him that we had an Ex Wall street banker running for Prime Minister which worried me greatly and he said “I would be too”. I asked what he thought would happen if he was elected and he answered, “He will sell your country down the drain and throw in his mother with the deal!”

I then told him he had served on the upon invitation only Foreign Exchange Committee (which his boss served on the period before John Key with none other than Robert Rubin the big Goldman Sachs Cahoona and responsible for the repeal of the Glass Steagall act ) and could he have been groomed to do just that and he answered with a smile, “It has happened before.”

So without further ado let me introduce you to G Edward Griffin and may I suggest to you you show this presentation to your loved ones, colleagues and most especially to your John Key voting friends!

Money As Debt-Full Length Documentary

Money As Debt is a fast-paced and highly entertaining animated feature by artist & videographer, Paul Grignon. It explains today's magically perverse DEBT-MONEY SYSTEM in terms that are easy to understand.

Check out his website: http://www.moneyasdebt.net/

Money is a new form of slavery, and distinguishable from the old simply by the fact that it is impersonal, there is no human relation between master and slave.

Debt- government, corporate and household has reached astronomical proportions. Where does all this money come from? How could there BE that much money to lend? The answer is...there isn't. Today, MONEY IS DEBT.

If there were NO DEBT there would be NO MONEY.

If this is puzzling to you, you are not alone. Very few people understand, even though all of us are affected.

G Edward Griffin, the Federal Reserve and John Key or How Time Flies
Yuki Fujita – Japanese MP

In March 2008 I was in Sydney. I had flown there to meet with some of the high profile 9/11 truth activists. I met with Bob Bowman the ex US military who ran the Space war program for Reagan until he woke up to the fact that there was nothing defensive about the program. I met with Yuki Fujita San the Japanese MP who broke into the MSM with his presentation about the inconsistencies of the official 9/11 CT to name a few but the most important meeting in hind side was the meeting I had with  gentleman called G Edward Griffin. I had never met him before and never even heard of him and a participant of the 9/11 truth conference of 2008 in Sydney had flown him in at his own expense to give the presentation he is famous for.

After I heard his presentation I had the chance to speak to G Edward Griffin and I used the time I had to ask him some questions and here are two poignant moments of the conversation I will never ever forget as long as I live.

I told him that we had an Ex Wall street banker running for Prime Minister which worried me greatly and he said “I would be too”. I asked what he thought would happen if he was elected and he answered, “He will sell your country down the drain and throw in his mother with the deal!”

I then told him he had served on the upon invitation only Foreign Exchange Committee (which his boss served on the period before John Key with none other than Robert Rubin the big Goldman Sachs Cahoona and responsible for the repeal of the Glass Steagall act ) and could he have been groomed to do just that and he answered with a smile, “It has happened before.”

So without further ado let me introduce you to G Edward Griffin and may I suggest to you you show this presentation to your loved ones, colleagues and most especially to your John Key voting friends!

This website is optimised for viewing in Mozilla Firefox

Fair Dealing Notice

These pages / videos may contain copyrighted (©) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorised by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democratic, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. With reference to The New Zealand Copyright Act 1994 such material is made available for critical, review, educational purposes and the reporting of current events. In accordance with The New Zealand Copyright Act 1994, this material is distributed without profit to those with a general interest in such information for research and education.

Fair Use Notice

These pages / videos may contain copyrighted (©) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorised by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democratic, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those with a general interest in such information for research and education.